- Joined
- Dec 3, 2024
- Messages
- 2,876
- Reaction score
- 3,085
- Points
- 5,977
Fine, if you're happy to pay 60 bucks on the same game we got a decade ago but personally I want a sequel to actually feel like an entirely different game and not a glorified DLC, I could excuse Mario Bros 2 The Lost Level back in the 80's but not a modern game for doing it.Speak for yourself, I'm more than fine with eating the same foods I happened to like.
Or maybe they're not your thing? I mean your opinion doesn't define objectivity and even Adventure was rated fine by critics.But seriously, I think there's a bit of a misunderstanding going on here. I don't dislike post-Star Fox 64 because they're different, I dislike them because they're bad. Hell, one of my favorite Mega Man games is Mega Man & Bass, and it's generally considered to be somewhat of an "odd duck" in the series.
You saying "xxxx is bad" is merely an opinion not an invariable, universal fact.
PS: I'm maybe one of those weird ones that prefers the SNES game over 64 simply because it was really innovative in 3D and was impressive for the SNES hardware, 64 was an expansion on the concept but was basically a remake of what was already done.
This is the same reason why I cannot rate Zelda Twilight Princess above Ocarina of Time because the later set the basis of the former.
Wind Waker tried something different at least, same with Majora's Mask despite their flaws.
I want a real Starfox 3 that introduces more characters (like in Starfox 2) and a new villain instead of bringing back that monkey.
The Retro Studio DKC games managed well without the Kremlings because K.Rool got defeated 4 times already.
PS: Kid Icarus Uprising had an entirely new antagonist compared to Medusa and a new gameplay perspective. Of Myths and Monsters on the GB was just a port which was disappointing to me because it didn't add anything new aside from the new antagonist.