I've been on forums since before Web2.0, so I have some frame of reference to compare things. I can start off with a review of the ones I remember.
Web 1.0:
- UseNet: Chaotic, difficult to access, not user friendly. The internet with the gloves off. More useful for large file trading than discussion (and that use eventually became outdated).
- GameFAQs forums: Really interesting for its time (though extremely simplistic by today's standards), but heavily censored and controlled because of the kiddies in the pool. Moved on when others created more unique forums.
- IGN Forums: Surprisingly very well done. Really deep and informative discussions on a variety of topics. Unfortunately, the profit motive borked it all and sent people elsewhere.
- Random independent forums: Less censored in terms of content, but very cliquey and prone to ban people for not fitting the mold.
- Fark: A waste of time full of idiots outside of a certain tag that generated the only quality content. Said tag was deleted along with its contents to avoid being labeled a
site, which turned the site into 100% useless garbage.
Web 2.0 (that I used):
- MySpace: An interesting novelty that ultimately was useless for anything other than posting music. Lack of things to do for non-musicians made it a waste of time.
- Wikipedia: Useful for readers, but a PITA for anyone who not only wants to edit, but has actual deep, academically solid knowledge of the subjects. A site that makes academics compete with ideologues to get research taken seriously and published is not going to build a real community no matter how useful the content ultimately is.
- Facebook: Useful at first, but enshittified pretty fast. Outside of college, it didn't do anything useful but allow you to tell which of your friends are actually ***h*les.
- YouTube: Started good with people using it for fun. Went downhill when monetization and the psychotic algorithm made it so you would get recommended extremist political content because you watched gaming and anime stuff (or anything for that matter).
- Digg: Was like Fark if the articles were actually worth reading. Ruined by a certain overzealous, doomed-to-fail political campaign being allowed to spam it and enshittification for profit.
- Reddit: Was reddit ever good good? It went from a weak Digg clone, to a good Digg clone with a subreddit for trading grossly illegal content, to better Digg, to the site that allows racist subreddits ("racism is okay" as Spez famously said), to hosting terrorist subreddits, to enshittifying so they can go public, to slowly edging towards the Great Value™ Meta that Spez always wanted.
- LinkedIn: Wanna give your resume to random people who should never get it? How about some scam job offers that will never pay you fairly for what you do? F*** the people who insisted I "needed" to have an account there to "move up".
Web 2.0 (that I refused to sign up for):
- Twitter: Not that useful on launch, filled mostly with abandoned accounts and bots. New management came in and changed that to Nazis and bots.
- TikTok, Instagram, etc: Briefly looked at the Zoomer fentanyl sites and decided that I never want anything to do with those opium dens.
- WhatsApp: I hate this one with a passion. It's hard to get a woman's number when she insists she won't communicate with anything but WhatsApp, even when you explain that Signal is more secure and won't get in the way of using WhatsApp.
- Anything owned by an authoritarian government: Not going to give my personal info to any organization that is already known to be malicious in nature.
So that brings use to this site. Is it better than the others? When compared to the Web 2.0 era, yes. There's no enshittification, no allowance for Nazis, no attempt to get people addicted, and no algorithm. There's definitely some comfort there in that there's no worry of my choices being artificially decided for me by malicious actors and/or machines.
At the same time, we do sometimes have some issues from the Web 1.0 era. We get some people here who simply do not read the rules, not even the first one. Granted, we have the ignore feature, but that only hides the behavior without stopping it. (When I click "show ignored content" out of curiosity for the context of another's response to something, I find that I still sometimes have someone screaming into the æther at me for some weird reason.) And new ones continue to arrive. (I'm up to 7 people on my ignore list now, which I guess is statistically not too bad, but a bit discomforting.)
So I can say it's chill here with a caveat. I'm mostly fine with it for now; we'll see where it all goes.