- Joined
- Jan 22, 2025
- Messages
- 1,748
- Level up in
- 752 posts
- Reaction score
- 5,966
- Points
- 4,477
- Location
- Spain

In a better timeline we would've gotten a second Mania game and a Classic Sonic movie animated in this style.
Mario is a fat smelly Italian plumber who does the same thing over and over again. Mario is a cult brainwashed the massesBecause Sonic is an animal and kinda boring as rpg character, no princess to save etc, otherwise tgere would be a flood spinoffs, it just doesnt sale.
The issue is that historically, for each idea Sonic tried, the Mario equivalent was much, much better.I wish the sonic franchise had as much spin offs as the Mario franchise.
I'd beg to differ though.Sega not just doing the same damn franchises over and over is one of the things I prefer them over Nintendo for.
Persona is Atlus. Sega owns Atlus but it's still its own company that does its own thing under Sega, and it was mostly MegaTen since before Sega bought them.Sega is often doing Sonic, Yakuza and Persona games around while barely remembering their older IPs.
(...)
A second party company I understand. But then you could argue that Fire Emblem is Intelligent Systems, Kirby Hal Laboratory and Pokémon GameFreaks. Should second party games be counted or not?Persona is Atlus. Sega owns Atlus but it's still its own company that does its own thing under Sega, and it was mostly MegaTen since before Sega bought them.
Why should it matter by the way? At the end of the day it's the quality of the games as well as the ideas themselves that count.Yakuza and Sonic are their two cash cows now so they have to keep them going. It doesn't change the fact that through their history they were always much more into doing the new thing than keeping every series going together.
Yes, I don't want more Sonic spin-off, that's what I said. A RPG in the mid 90s could have been cool though.A second party company I understand. But then you could argue that Fire Emblem is Intelligent Systems, Kirby Hal Laboratory and Pokémon GameFreaks. Should second party games be counted or not?
Still: Persona is, above Megami Tensei, the IP that gave them quite a lot of funds to Sega.
Why should it matter by the way? At the end of the day it's the quality of the games as well as the ideas themselves that count.
Sega replaced Sakura Wars by Valkyria Chronicles but fundamentally both are strategy games with a focus on story. Shining as a franchise (including Force) got slowly eclipsed by Sakura Wars as well.
I'd also argue that despite using the same IPs you can see a difference between old Zelda games and new ones or even how much variety Mario as an IP has brought (the only series that kept it too safe and bland could be the later two NSMB games).
In fact people would rather see a comeback of older Nintendo IPs they haven't used in a while (like Kid Icarus). Same with Sega until recently with their announcement.
But we're digressing a bit there. Sonic having more spin-offs goes against what you said about wanting more novelty as well.
Okay, we can agree that these strategy game series are different but so are Nintendo platformer series or how several of their have evolved and changed through time.Valkyria Chronicles isn't really like Sakura Wars, and neither is like Shining Force. You're playing it very loose there to make that point.
My point was that the "Sega does new stuff unlike Nintendo" argument cannot be really applied when even Sega loves reusing the same IPs as well.And Persona is a Megami Tensei spin-off, so it's still MegaTen.
I want actually good ones.I feel like the Sonic franchise has already dipped it's toes in a bunch of spin off games.
I wouldn't mind more though.
I talked with my uncle who works at Sega and he said no.I want actually good ones.
They are already doing btw.I would like them to make actually good games first lol.
It's not Sonic but Project X Zone is a great Sega + Namco + Capcom crossover RPG.I wish there was a good Sonic RPG.