- Joined
- Feb 3, 2025
- Messages
- 2,079
- Level up in
- 421 posts
- Reaction score
- 5,978
- Points
- 4,477
- Location
- Syria
Yeah seen that one heard you play as the man himself garland and you get to visit cornelia or whatever the heck first town was called.
If you like Team Ninja action games like Nioh it's probably worth a shot, especially if you'd like some more meat to your FF1.Yeah seen that one heard you play as the man himself garland and you get to visit cornelia or whatever the heck first town was called.
No I never played team ninja but im always down to trying new games and new game genresIf you like Team Ninja action games like Nioh it's probably worth a shot, especially if you'd like some more meat to your FF1.
I'm not into those kinds of action games myself very much, but the job system is pretty cool.
Red Mage is Really Good, please jsut trust me, it gets a lot of good equipment options plus most of the black and white magic, including Thundaga, Blizzaga, Firaga, Curaga, and Life(Raise/Revive). Its physical attack while not as good as knight or monk is still serviceable unlike thief. its just a really good jack of all trades overall.In terms of repeatability I guess yeah? In my playthrough I didn't use a monk or a red mage although I doubt red mage is worth giving a try in terms of looks he is the coolest (sorry black mage) but since he is a mix of both and white and black I guess his usefulness goes down further as the game progresses im basing this off my experience with the red mage in ff5 who seems like a very decent pick in the mid game but completely falls of late game.
having played the 3d remake of ff3 only, I can say ff3 is the worst final fantasy ive played, the job system sucks, half the jobs are worthless and the other half get outclassed by the last 2 jobs you get except for maybe black belt if you have the right equipment. also yeah the mini dungeon is genuine pain to go thru, there is annoying stuff like that all throughout the gameFf3 is the only 2d game I didn't play yet I kinda want to try its 2d version before trying the 3d remake square just doesn't seem very fond of this game they re-release all 2d games on the ps1 save for ff3 idk why it just feels like they don't like it as much as other 2d games , since the red mage is quite versatile I think its alright if he got nerfed if I remember right from ff5 he had decent strength so he was able to deal physical damage as well although not capable of taking damage at all he still looks cool as heck tho.
black mage vs red mage is really only up for debate in ff1. that's when they are the closest in viability, the red mage gets all spells up to level 7 once promoted. only level 8 magic is restricted. they get a wide variety of armors and shields, lots of good swords. very balanced, more strength and defense than a mage, more magic than the warrior/knight, thief/ninja and monk/master; and the inverse hold true as well.I agree that Red Mage is decently OP, so is the redhead Fighter. I still think Black Mage vs Red Mage is an interesting debate. The only class I think is unusable is the Thief. Too bad in the early game and the Ninja isn't that much better than the Red Wizard.
So would it be possible to reduce the cut scenes down to say a text scroll so that the information is still there but unneeded in regards to the actual gameplay?yeah, some parts are in 3d, but it's usually in small areas like you said. buildings and hallways. it's probably like the same situation with the psx games. the backgrounds were actual 3d models and just had pictures taken of them and used as a backdrop; while the gameplay area is a small 3d space overlaid on top of a picture.
a lot of a game's size is located in the graphics. and ffx has full motion videos too, so the actual game might be a lot smaller.
Sad to here but still glad it was said...?I Don't think you could. if i remember right, Rockstar was going to put GTA3 on the Dreamcast anyhow, and had part of the code done. and since it got Leaked, Fan coders and such have worked on it. but Already had part of the Code to work From.
Most likely it Would not be possible.
if it Could be done. it would have to be Reverse engineered from the ground up.
which without a Large team activity working on it full time, might take Years, or Decades.
View attachment 21235
yeah. you could just cut out the voice acting. skies of arcadia only uses small, quick snippets of voice acting, mainly for battle techniques. the script could still belong though. i have a copy of the game script i found on gamefaqs. it's about 750 kb in total. not all of it is necessary. if you know what you need and don't need, you could trim it down. most of the scenes could be replicated with in game graphics and careful direction on how to execute them.So would it be possible to reduce the cut scenes down to say a text scroll so that the information is still there but unneeded in regards to the actual gameplay?
I actually really liked it. Especially the dlc with the fight with dissidia Warrior of light and the ff2 emperor.This game is literally exactly what you're requesting.
I think it's awful, but if you want to play a weird take on FF1 with actual "characters" and lots of focus on Garland (I really can't say more without spoiling the whole thing), this is the one:
View attachment 21652
Enjoy! I think the Pixel Remaster is the best version of FF1 (would've been PSP if it had the old-school magic system!)
This generation without a doubt is unoptimized though. Sometimes you have to be user without years of Unreal engine and nothing else under their belt to notice that visually similar games run with worse FPS with worse native resolutions. Latest example for me is Marvel Rivals that does not significantly look better than say, Overwatch that released years ago. The portal effect halves the performance of the game while Valve developers optimized their's on source engine a decade ago better, as did splitgate where having numerous portals are not hinderance to the gameplay performance, that works at 60fps on last gen hardware.oh don't worry about it, you don't have to apologize everyone is free to express themselves. Just as someone who works with code/engines/tools/SDKs on a daily basis, reading gamers take on why "games are unoptimized" or "why cant they do this" is just.. *sigh*
You can defend the attempt at a plot and maybe the "level up each stat" idea.Am I the only Final Fantasy II apologist?
Hate for the original trilogy is so forced. ff1 is fine and ff3 is pretty dope especially after getting the black belt job.Heard a statement once that said final fantasy only got good at its 4th installment having played the first 2 games I can see a bit of a point into this statement but to really see if its true I have to get ff3 the original version or any non 3d version that isn't well pixel remaster anyone know where to get it? Since its the first iteration ever of job system which was pretty decent in ff5 when I first saw the job system I thought you will pick a job and work and such the word "job" must have been replaced with class its way more fitting.
This is a really bad take honestly.Heard a statement once that said final fantasy only got good at its 4th installment having played the first 2 games I can see a bit of a point into this statement but to really see if its true I have to get ff3 the original version or any non 3d version that isn't well pixel remaster anyone know where to get it? Since its the first iteration ever of job system which was pretty decent in ff5 when I first saw the job system I thought you will pick a job and work and such the word "job" must have been replaced with class its way more fitting.
I respectfully disagree ff4 is pretty fast paced compared to 1 & 5 the levelling is much smoother and each character has unique skills not an exact substitute for job system but its good.This is a really bad take honestly.
FF 1-3 are all fine games hell l like 3 more then 4 because of how boring 4 is to play.
I love Stranger of Paradise, probably the best Final Fantasy game since 12; it's also a much better action game than XVIThis game is literally exactly what you're requesting.
I think it's awful, but if you want to play a weird take on FF1 with actual "characters" and lots of focus on Garland (I really can't say more without spoiling the whole thing), this is the one:
View attachment 21652
Enjoy! I think the Pixel Remaster is the best version of FF1 (would've been PSP if it had the old-school magic system!)
early nes/famicom games have an average size of 30-60 kb. that includes game engine, sprites, music data and text. later games could get bigger, but only unofficial games ever got to or past 1mb in size.
that is not a lot of space to work with, and games in those days had short development cycles. six months was about the average. 3-4 months was more common.
You can party up with your friends and do some quests. Like Leveletes (which are just basic fetch or kill quests) and FATEs. You can't however, play the main story with your friends. So, if you want to do dungeons or raids, you have to unparty, and your friend has to go through the story alone; and unlock the dungeons, which you can do together.
So the game basically works like a single player game, but the dungeons and raids are co-op.
I understand the limits of that era its acceptable at that time.early nes/famicom games have an average size of 30-60 kb. that includes game engine, sprites, music data and text. later games could get bigger, but only unofficial games ever got to or past 1mb in size.
that is not a lot of space to work with, and games in those days had short development cycles. six months was about the average. 3-4 months was more common.
the people who originally worked on those games are most likely not there anymore. and i doubt the company keeps any documents, notes or sketches from back then. i'm fairly certain that is the main reason capcom can't make a legends 3 game.I understand the limits of that era its acceptable at that time.
But we are no longer in that era they have more space to work with and better technology and everything yet square decides to keep the early games as close as they were in 87/88 not making use of increased size limit and such features that are possible now they could make it better but again decides to not improve story for some unexplainable reason.
But then it would be a different game altogether.I understand the limits of that era its acceptable at that time.
But we are no longer in that era they have more space to work with and better technology and everything yet square decides to keep the early games as close as they were in 87/88 not making use of increased size limit and such features that are possible now they could make it better but again decides to not improve story for some unexplainable reason.
indeed. a little bit of stuff wouldn't hurt, a few scenes while the characters are traveling and talk about stuff wouldn't hurt; ff4 has thought bubbles for the overworld character to have that shows off some thoughts that the character is having about current events.But then it would be a different game altogether.