Any other Linux users here? And has anyone fully migrated?

[_oBSOLEte_]

I was honestly wondering the same thing.
Nice skin of winamp at least.

Really dig the two little volume knobs.

 

[diapered]

especially with my Nvidia card

huh, so mint does extra configuration during setup for nvidia hardware to make that easier? That's cool.

After delving into Garuda Arch I came back to mint

I have nothing but love for garuda, but yea I currently only have machines with integrated graphics and on the garuda forums I do see posts about nvidia troubles, but I think any distro would come with nvidia headaches? Is there something mint is doing to make that configuration easier?

 

[SkaaTerminator]

huh, so mint does extra configuration during setup for nvidia hardware to make that easier? That's cool.

I dont think that is I just downloaded the propeitary drivers for it and I had no issues with it

 

[popckorn]

huh, so mint does extra configuration during setup for nvidia hardware to make that easier? That's cool.

Mint offers a final NVIDIA drivers download independent of the setup, but 100% integrated into the setup process, it is impossible to miss, so it is easier indeed.

I run on all AMD Ryzen 7 735HS + RX7700S, and since November 2024 with the new Linux Mint Release I had nothing but a simple install without any Kernel update to have support for the GPU.
Linux Mint used to have a curated Kernel that would stay behind for stability's sake.
From November 2024 onward all Linux Mint ships with a rolling kernel, so it has way better support for newer GPUs out of the box.

It was harder having this GPU in late 2023 when you would have to update the kernel to bleeding edge (also pretty simple through the Update Manager).

 

[ATenderLad]

Tidied the thread a bit, not entirely sure how it became about nudity. Carry on!

 

[popckorn]

Losers who hate beauty man.
For real.

 

[diapered]

Got a wine question for my linux frens here ^_^

I am burning dreamcast games and don't have windows (obviously) and was wondering would the version of windows affect the success of the burn? I have only gotten 4 discs to work (out of ~18?) I read on dreamcast forums this is supposed to be frustrating, so I just want to rule this out. I would think as long as the emulated windows version recognizes my optical drive, the version of windows won't matter, but I am not someone that really knows hardware I saw many say wine should work, but many said to use XP, but in my experience, only Windows 2000 and NT 4.0 (lol, no idea why I tried different versions but they worked O_o) have worked...

The above is my main question for ya'll, but if you happen to have burned games yourselves (after I rule wine out, I'll ask on the sega forum) I have only been using discjuggler, since cdi images are made with discjuggler. Should I try imgBurn? I also saw that program mentioned...

 

[Leon]

Got a wine question for my linux frens here ^_^

I am burning dreamcast games and don't have windows (obviously) and was wondering would the version of windows affect the success of the burn? I have only gotten 4 discs to work (out of ~18?) I read on dreamcast forums this is supposed to be frustrating, so I just want to rule this out. I would think as long as the emulated windows version recognizes my optical drive, the version of windows won't matter, but I am not someone that really knows hardware I saw many say wine should work, but many said to use XP, but in my experience, only Windows 2000 and NT 4.0 (lol, no idea why I tried different versions but they worked O_o) have worked...

The above is my main question for ya'll, but if you happen to have burned games yourselves (after I rule wine out, I'll ask on the sega forum) I have only been using discjuggler, since cdi images are made with discjuggler. Should I try imgBurn? I also saw that program mentioned...

Well the first question i'd have is if your burning cdi's or gdi's, gdi's cannot be made as it's a proprietary disk format, cdi's is a converted format that makes it work on a normal dreamcast.

 

[popckorn]

Burn at the fastest speed your software allows.
If in doubt verify the CD-R is rated for said speed, but usually the software detects the rating of the CD-R.

Forcing slower speeds is a CURRENT MYTH from OUTDATED INSTRUCTIONS from when CD-R were calibrated for slower speeds, and so did our hardware, two decades ago.

 

[_oBSOLEte_]

Got a wine question for my linux frens here ^_^

I am burning dreamcast games and don't have windows (obviously) and was wondering would the version of windows affect the success of the burn? I have only gotten 4 discs to work (out of ~18?) I read on dreamcast forums this is supposed to be frustrating, so I just want to rule this out. I would think as long as the emulated windows version recognizes my optical drive, the version of windows won't matter, but I am not someone that really knows hardware I saw many say wine should work, but many said to use XP, but in my experience, only Windows 2000 and NT 4.0 (lol, no idea why I tried different versions but they worked O_o) have worked...

The above is my main question for ya'll, but if you happen to have burned games yourselves (after I rule wine out, I'll ask on the sega forum) I have only been using discjuggler, since cdi images are made with discjuggler. Should I try imgBurn? I also saw that program mentioned...

Interesting... I've only used cdrtools and mkisofs on linux and didnt burn anything since years, but maybe check this one it seems to be a viable linux alternative :

Dreamcast CDI Burner : Burn ALL CDI File Types On Linux With Open Source Software - Dreamcast-Talk.com

GitHub - alex-free/dreamcast-cdi-burner: Burns ALL Sega Dreamcast .CDI file types with open source portable software on Linux.

Burns ALL Sega Dreamcast .CDI file types with open source portable software on Linux. - alex-free/dreamcast-cdi-burner

github.com

With DiscJuggler, I guess you should set Wine's configuration to the latest version of windows the DiscJuggler app was made for, and maybe try to burn slow for the first few times before testing faster.

 

[diapered]

Well the first question i'd have is if your burning cdi's or gdi's

cdi's

Forcing slower speeds is a CURRENT MYTH from OUTDATED INSTRUCTIONS from when CD-R were calibrated for slower speeds, and so did our hardware, two decades ago.

Thanks @popckorn I also saw others mentioning that, and yea I think forcing 1X or 4X is a little excessive, but I have been using 10X because I didn't want to go too fast... Hm, I'll try that.

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 7:23 PM

With DiscJuggler, I guess you should set Wine's configuration to the latest version of windows the DiscJuggler app was made for, and maybe try to burn slow for the first few times before testing.

That's what I thought too! This is why I thought it is also an interesting wine question: a version of windows that existed LONG before this version of discJuggler worked O_o and was my first success. I don't know why but only early windows architecture seems to work here? For what reason?

This is also why I wanted to ask because this is my first time I have had a distro where wine installs and configures easily ( garuda) and made me want to try this, so I don't know how much the version of windows would matter for this task. This is my first time actually playing around with wine...

 

[_oBSOLEte_]

cdi's

Thanks @popckorn I also saw others mentioning that, and yea I think forcing 1X or 4X is a little excessive, but I have been using 10X because I didn't want to go too fast... Hm, I'll try that.

Post automatically merged: Yesterday at 7:23 PM

That's what I thought too! This is why I thought it is also an interesting wine question: a version of windows that existed LONG before this version of discJuggler worked O_o and was my first success. I don't know why but only early windows architecture seems to work here? For what reason?

This is also why I wanted to ask because this is my first time I have had a distro where wine installs and configures easily ( garuda) and made me want to try this, so I don't know how much the version of windows would matter for this task. This is my first time actually playing around with wine...

I read on wikipedia that DiscJuggler was released in 2006...

 

[popckorn]

Also, I burned 100+ CD-R for PSOne, with my mothers Windows PC because it is the only PC in my reach that still has a CD-R Drive, lol it runs on Celeron n3050, it is A SLUUUUUUUG, but it burns FINE using ImgBurn

Have you tried using ImgBurn under your WINE or with Bottles?

 

[diapered]

I read on wikipedia that DiscJuggler was released in 2006...

Yup, that's the version I'm using. So why would windows NT4.0 (1998 and support ended in 2004) work at all? Now that I think about it, windows 2000 had an unusually long term of support I guess (I'm not sure date of which service pack wine is using, but I assume the last?), so maybe that isn't so surprising it worked, but that came out 2000...

 

[_oBSOLEte_]

Yup, that's the version I'm using. So why would windows NT4.0 (1998 and support ended in 2004) work at all? Now that I think about it, windows 2000 had an unusually long term of support I guess (I'm not sure date of which service pack wine is using, but I assume the last?), so maybe that isn't so surprising it worked, but that came out 2000...

I dont know. Which version of Wine do you use?
There's only three tests on WineDB for the app and the last one was in 2010 with Wine 1.2.1. https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=12106

I dont remember if there was a setting for presets of wine for so many versions of windows back then. Usually setting for x32 or x64 should be enough.

 

[diapered]

Have you tried using ImgBurn under your WINE

Trying that now that you mentioned it, and I'm a little skeptical because I had to change a setting to make it recognize my drive (SPTI interface instead of ASPI, lol no idea what this windows shit is), while discjuggler pretty much worked otb... But it is burning, so good sign right?

I dont know. Which version of Wine do you use?
There's only three tests on WineDB for the app and the last one was in 2010 with Wine 1.2.1. https://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=version&iId=12106

I dont remember if there was a setting for presets of wine for so many versions of windows back then. Usually setting for x32 or x64 should be enough.

Wine 10.6 lol last was 2010? Well, I can say discjuggler does work in 2025, as I was able to make a few burns work, so it is possible. I'm just not sure what to blame on the reliability: wine, my drive laser, particular cd medium, write speed (like @popckorn mentioned) or just bad luck >_<

My feeling is if the write device is receiving the instructions, it doesn't matter if it is through a wine layer, regardless of the version, so it has to be something else. I just wanted some opinions on that. So you all would also think as long as it is writing, the version of windows of the wine layer doesn't matter? That's kind of what I think. Because there are some versions of windows that won't work at all for discjuggler. And imgBurn seems to only work with an XP layer...