I can’t think of a single time this “fallacy” has been wrong.I suppose in part @Gorse's concern stems from the slippery slope phenomenon
I can’t think of a single time this “fallacy” has been wrong.I suppose in part @Gorse's concern stems from the slippery slope phenomenon
I suppose in part @Gorse's concern stems from the slippery slope phenomenon, but again, I don't think you'll find the kind of leniency and freedom we enjoy here elsewhere on the internet.
It's always funny how slang works to me. With the green stuff, it is that baked, with cake and muffins, it's another baked ?Sounds like me, but I think we're thinking of different things.
What do you mean by allowing too much leniency, exactly? I think so far things seem on an even keel. Noone is shouting racial slurs.The slippery slope slips both ways. Allow too much leniency and we have the next 4chan on our hands. It's on all of us to build the community we want to see.
I agree, which is why, as users, we should all commit to making high-quality, good-faith posts. WHO’S WITH ME????? (IMMEDIATELY BANNED)It's on all of us to build the community we want to see.
Exactly, no one here is that mean spirited, and said person would stick out like a sore thumb.What do you mean by allowing too much leniency, exactly? I think so far things seem on an even keel. Noone is shouting racial slurs.
Exactly, no one here is that mean spirited, and said person would stick out like a sore thumb.
Right, I don't think this point is being argued.And the easiest way to keep it that way is to have clear rules that empower the mods to do their jobs.
The mods have all the power they need to do their jobs. The point here is that noone wants the mods to be able to wield a little bit of power and start making decisions based on personal impulses and not the welfare of the board.And the easiest way to keep it that way is to have clear rules that empower the mods to do their jobs.
The mods have all the power they need to do their jobs. The point here is that noone wants the mods to be able to wield a little bit of power and start making decisions based on personal impulses and not the welfare of the board.
I don't think your definition of "good faith" is in good faith though. What with the sneak dissin' and all.I agree, which is why, as users, we should all commit to making high-quality, good-faith posts. WHO’S WITH ME????? (IMMEDIATELY BANNED)
I think we should hold public trials and, if necessary, executions. But three strikes could also work.Maybe a three strikes, you are out policy? Maybe temporary bans for first time offenders? I don't think what Gorse is suggesting is a good idea, though.
But that's what keeps things interesting!I don't think your definition of "good faith" is in good faith though. What with the sneak dissin' and all.
Why do you think so? Maybe explain the reasons?Maybe a three strikes, you are out policy? Maybe temporary bans for first time offenders? I don't think what Gorse is suggesting is a good idea, though.
That's so tedious though ?I think we should hold public trials and, if necessary, executions. But three strikes could also work.
Why do you think so? Maybe explain the reasons?
Being able to shit talk in a reasonable and adult manner is what Gorse is advocating for, and it seems reasonable.Gorse seems to love tip-toeing the line for what is an acceptable or at the very least, a tolerable amount of shit-talking, and I think people would be more against it if he wasn't so good about staying fair about the whole thing.
I see. I can see why you would think that way. Like previously said, it's hard to expect everyone to not ignite in the face of such topicsBecause what he's suggesting is so nebulous and undefinable, it makes for poor policy.
Well, it's like. When you have to say something to someone about a thing like a flawed way of thinking or the way they go about handling situations, but you don't want to hurt the other person's feelings, nor allow them to fully grasp the depths of your critique.Being able to shit talk in a reasonable and adult manner is what Gorse is advocating for, and it seems reasonable.