fuq shitendo. ill play their mid gaemz 4 free or not at all.
the fans do it bettr anyway. romhacks > official releases
the fans do it bettr anyway. romhacks > official releases
So bit of a late update that honestly looks like even if nintendo wins on the last one, it's a net loss for nintendo.
22 of the 23 patents nintendo made on pokemon against palworld were rejected by USPTO:
![]()
Nintendo's Anti-Palworld Patent Assault Hits A Snag As USPTO Rejects 22 Of 23 Filings
Nintendo and the Pokémon Company's lawsuit, which was filed last year, is now on shakier ground after recent USPTO patent decision.hothardware.com
Funny thing is, the one that wasn't was specifically involving getting on and off a mount in a specific way, which there are workarounds for.
Let me be clear, nintendo lost on pokeballs, catch mechanic etc, everything but a specific mechanic of getting on and off a mount, even if nintendo wins on that it's unlikely to be enough to shut down palworld.
*Notices the thread has revived*
What i missed, the Rock is president?
Nice. I'm glad. I think palworld deserves to stay around and this shows that people can take inspiration from the big companies and that sometimes the big companies can't just try to attack them if they do something they find too similar to them.So bit of a late update that honestly looks like even if nintendo wins on the last one, it's a net loss for nintendo.
22 of the 23 patents nintendo made on pokemon against palworld were rejected by USPTO:
![]()
Nintendo's Anti-Palworld Patent Assault Hits A Snag As USPTO Rejects 22 Of 23 Filings
Nintendo and the Pokémon Company's lawsuit, which was filed last year, is now on shakier ground after recent USPTO patent decision.hothardware.com
Funny thing is, the one that wasn't was specifically involving getting on and off a mount in a specific way, which there are workarounds for.
Let me be clear, nintendo lost on pokeballs, catch mechanic etc, everything but a specific mechanic of getting on and off a mount, even if nintendo wins on that it's unlikely to be enough to shut down palworld.
just covered this in my business law class - this is a form of patent trolling where they attempt to patent things for the purpose of stopping a competitor from gaining too much groundYeah the USPTO doesn't joke around with frivolous patent claims. They have to prove it is a technical invention with schematics and code. They can't simply patent vague ideas.
22 OUT OF 23? Against Suentendo? they will never live that one down XDNice. I'm glad. I think palworld deserves to stay around and this shows that people can take inspiration from the big companies and that sometimes the big companies can't just try to attack them if they do something they find too similar to them.
Not to be the devil's advocate but weren't there dramas with the Smash community around that time?they even shut down Smash tournaments
Weren't they better than what they've made on the Wii U?as well and then Nintendo making subpar games on the Switch.
So bit of a late update that honestly looks like even if nintendo wins on the last one, it's a net loss for nintendo.
22 of the 23 patents nintendo made on pokemon against palworld were rejected by USPTO:
![]()
Nintendo's Anti-Palworld Patent Assault Hits A Snag As USPTO Rejects 22 Of 23 Filings
Nintendo and the Pokémon Company's lawsuit, which was filed last year, is now on shakier ground after recent USPTO patent decision.hothardware.com
Funny thing is, the one that wasn't was specifically involving getting on and off a mount in a specific way, which there are workarounds for.
Let me be clear, nintendo lost on pokeballs, catch mechanic etc, everything but a specific mechanic of getting on and off a mount, even if nintendo wins on that it's unlikely to be enough to shut down palworld.
Lmao, i agree but it probably would prevent nintendo from trying again, since now palworld can fight fire with fire.Another New Update I think, Basically what the commentary is saying is that there might be grounds for pocketpair to actually countersue nintendo. I personally dont think that is very likely though
That's not really the point here, the point was nintendo shouldn't have been able to file the lawsuit in the first place because in general, pocketpair did nothing wrong in this entire ordeal legally.While I can see some qualities in Palworld I think that there are already too many indie games trying to mimic popular Nintendo IP without actually understanding what made them good to begin with.