Mario 64 is good but most of the games have aged poorlyThe n64 didn't even have good games wdym![]()
I will warn you, I have a unique set of skills, and I will find you, and I will burn your house (for legal reasons this is a joke)The n64 didn't even have good games wdym![]()
Ohhh, and you create an account to do that? how lovely :3Lets make some people angry today
?Ohhh, and you create an account to do that? how lovely :3
View attachment 73862
Ok I’ll have to agree on super smash bros, the newer ones are betterN64 is easily the most overrated system so I could cheat and say all of them.
I'll pick this one instead.
View attachment 73863
I always found the first one felt very clunky to control
Sorry if I had to point my comment was black humour :(
Yeah that's correct, smash bros on 64 was not that goodOk I’ll have to agree on super smash bros, the newer ones are better
It's fineSorry if I had to point my comment was black humour :(
It was important but nowadays the game has aged poorly against the test of time compared to melee or ultimateSuper Smash Bros. was a pioneer of it's time, the first of it's kind
I enjoy mischief makers but banjo is not better than Mario 64Mario 64 is nowhere near the legendary status bestowed upon it.
Banjo-Kazooie is better, so is Mischief Makers.
you don't have to be first, just bigger and louder than the guy that came before.Super Smash Bros. was a pioneer of it's time, the first of it's kind
I love mischief makers but it and banjo aren’t better then Mario 64 dudeMario 64 is nowhere near the legendary status bestowed upon it.
Banjo-Kazooie is better, so is Mischief Makers.
ya I wasn't gonna bother saying anything because it's so common, but saying a game aged poorly is dumb.I don't think aging is a reason to hate on a game; I personaly never liked triple A games for example and prefer low poly/stylized stuff. Maybe I misunderstood the comments, this is a retro forum after all yk