- Joined
- Oct 4, 2024
- Messages
- 222
- Level up in
- 28 posts
- Reaction score
- 1,231
- Points
- 1,727
- Location
- Amnéville, France
it is my conclusion after years of distro hopping and linux usage that we shouldn't limit ourself with the distro package manager...why? Using the package manager is one of the great benefits of Linux to me, unless you're struggling with really old packages in your manager I'm not sure why you'd go through the trouble of installing and upgrading it all manually. Even then, I would switch to a rolling release or write some install scripts to they're at least tracked by my manager.
It is great when my network libraries get automatically patched by Aptitude on my Debian servers, when qemu gets updated on Arch breaking all my VMs because their bios is not supported anymore it is not so great
when I'm unable to download a video because the yt-dlp in pacman is over a month old that's when I learn that I should have installed it through pip instead, when I am on obscure distros that are great but have few packages (or no package manager at all) that's when I learn the immense value of appimages, generic tarballs and flatpak
a rolling release distro is one that will constantly make you work because they will keep dropping support for how you configured it before, it is also one where random softwares will stop working one day because one lib is suddenly too old or too new
a stable distro will just work, software in the package manager will be outdated but you can cut the middleman and get your stuff straight from the source
waterfox got its own built-in updater, if my software doesn't hit the network I don't want it to be constantly updated anyway, unless I am really hyped about a new feature in that case I will think of downloading the newer version (I'm not hyped often)
ever heard of that one time when duckstation's dev crashed out because of the broken unofficial AUR packages ? that was pretty funny