Your takes on AI art

cubonion

Young Hero
Level 1
Joined
Mar 21, 2025
Messages
31
Reaction score
29
Points
127
Location
Mementos
What do you think about it?

I'll start:

In my honest opinion, I think its kind of like a "plague", can't look anywhere without seeing it...
Recently, shops in my area started using it. Why can't they get a picture off the internet, or, hire an artist? Its totally BS in my opinion.
 
What do you think about it?

I'll start:

In my honest opinion, I think its kind of like a "plague", can't look anywhere without seeing it...
Recently, shops in my area started using it. Why can't they get a picture off the internet, or, hire an artist? Its totally BS in my opinion.

Do you want to start a war?
 
its easier than dealing with an artist, waiting for it, paying for it. Pretty simple explanation given how human beings have always operated.
 
Sigh... Here I go again... The artist yaps about generative AI art...
It's a plague, it's not only putting people out of work in an already shitty field where people didn't get paid as it was, it's also making all these randoms on the Internet think they're artists.
Writing a prompt for 10 minute or hey, maybe even an hour or two if you're THAT slow, is nothing in comparison to the years artists take to master their craft. No, your AI doesn't make art "better" than other real artists, wanna know why? Because no hand drawn human made art is "bad". Art is subjective and art is a mountain that people climb, "But destinyduelist, if art is subjective how come AI art isn't?" because AI art isn't art. Something that isn't art to begin with can't be "bad". Generative AI art is theft, you're stealing artwork because how do you think those AI models were trained? AI art isn't art simply because there was no effort or emotion put into the piece. And no, you the person that wrote the prompt doesn't count. Your emotion written onto some generative AI isn't real, it belongs to the 1's and 0's of the machine you just fed. Your thoughts and feelings are no longer your own, you've given full custody of them to the machine, and the machine can't feel them when creating "your" art, because it's exactly that. A machine. A feelingless, soulless slop machine generating thousands upon thousands of images that look identical to yours. You're not special, you didn't create anything unique, you just feed the slop machine to generate another image of an anime character that looks almost near identical to the one thousands of other people did. You're not only tracing, but you're doing an advanced version of it.
Generative AI isn't just plauging art, so much of it is being used for music too now, for lyrics, even for voice acting if you've been keeping up with what Ubislop is doing.
Now, look, I know some people here are going to get really really offended, so let me just say this all applies to people who use it for COMMERICAL PURPOSES. I don't give a damn if you're sitting at home generating Bart Simpson doing backflips on your computer and laughing at how shit it all looks. Unfortunately we can't stop the process and development of generative AI so I can't blame people who just want to try and see what it's all about. But when people start claiming themselves as "AI artists" or even worse trying to advertise themselves using it or selling it in any way shape or form, that's when it becomes a problem. That's when you've become part of the machine.
As for generative AI being used as a tool, I mean yeah, that was it's intended purpose. I don't use it at all, but I can see it being applied as a tool to speed up mundane tasks. I don't really know personally what you'd use it for specifically since if I can't draw a hand or something I'll take a picture of my own, but I'm sure there's more niche places where people could apply it.
 
Complicated issue. From the consumer end, it annoys me when they (meaning the party using AI art) don't bother with quality control and I can spot mangled fingers and visual glitches. I have a 2025 calendar that seems very much full of AI generated art with no QA. And as someone who saw on NightCafe what good AI art could look like, it hurt my eyes.

From the artist end, I would be pissed for sure. Now I would have to compete with an easily accessible amalgamation of every artist on the planet. I can empathize to a degree. I get my feathers ruffled over AI generated stories.
 
I get my feathers ruffled over AI generated stories.
You can immediately tell when an AI wrote something. Its never anything good. I genuinely believe an 8 year old could write better stuff than an AI, in fact I truly believe the average person who has no experience in writing absolute zero experience can write a better story or article or song than generative AI. Its just so easy to tell and it really is just so bad every time.
 
At first I thought it could be something to boost the imagination of already highly imaginative and creative people, not as a substitute for manual analog art and labor, but as something to grant nigh divine inspiration, but as a sickeningly vast majority feels different, the whole of the internet is now utterly saturated with AI shit, reddit has literally become a depository for AI images of absolutely everything you can imagine, regardless of category and whim.

So while I think that generally AI can have positive applications in our society, in ways we cannot foresee as of now, but the image/art/video generation front is a an afront to artists, the creative process in general and humanity as a whole.

I stil feel that if used correctly, it can be a good thing, but almost nobody wants to use it "correctly" or in moderation, rather the absolute opposite, so we are swimming in a veritable sea of 8 fingered hell-slop.
 
I think AI art (and most generative AI in general - at least in the ways it is predominantly employed currently) is a plague.
I think it's genuinely damaging in the long term both socially and culturally and while I understand why the average person may find its use appealing or convenient, that appeal and convenience in no way justifies the apparent absence of any kind of (effective!) regulation on it in the commercial sector.
 
Last edited:
I'm okay if people use it for shitposts, temporary placeholders or something that's only meant for themselves. I'm sure it won't completely replace artists, the same way cameras didn't replace artists when they were invented. What we can do if we want to see less of it is rage against big companies and refuse to buy their products, if we do this often we might actually change something for the better.
 
To me, AI art is the worst thing to have come out of our society, and I'll never support it no matter what.
If it's used just for shits and giggles, that's fine.
But for commercial use?
HELL NO!
Real art takes effort and care to make, no matter how good or bad the result was.
It's the effort you put into it that matters the most.
Not to mention the SOUL put into each piece an artist makes.
Whereas AI art ain't got no SOUL.
NEVER DID, NEVER WILL.
 
This is how I view people who defend AI art with their lives

1000005214.jpg
 
It doesn't directly impact my life, at least so far. So i honestly don't have any strong opinion about it.


But i have a good amount of AI generated images on my R34 collections. I think they're decent for characters that's not very popular in the scene. Even if they got 6 fingers, an extra limbs or repetitive poses. Well it's better than nothing lol
 
I dislike it. I'm no artist, but I really dislike it. It looks fake, soulless and is an insult to anyone that actually puts an effort to make something nice. This applies regardless of the art discipline you might wanna talk about, be it images, music, software, or any other form of art you can think of.
 
Its a genie who has been let out of the bottle. It WILL become indistinguishable from actual art one day (sooner than we'd like) and we all WILL be worse off because of it.

However, I do find it funny that people would say "its theft" on a forum that is based around sharing roms. A lot of people think that is theft too (I don't).
Is the AI just emulating art?
 
I don't think AI will ever "replace" art. That's like when people were afraid that photography would make art irrelevant. Photography encouraged painters to abandon realism and embrace personal expression. AI can't generate something spontaneously without a prompt, so it will mostly be used to imitate the styles of well-established artists. It cannot "be" the next Cézanne or Picasso.

The real problem is economic, especially for people who make concept art, fanart, commissions, etc. Those people are seriously threatened by AI because their work is basically done by request. So of course their customers are going to prefer the cheap or free option of AI generation. There will be some commission artists who survive probably on the sheer strength of their talent, and there will always be people who would rather commission a "genuine" piece, but the market will become smaller.

I think this is basically a problem with how artists haven't been fairly compensated for their work for ages, how the commercial illustration market collapsed in the 2000s, and how most genre artists work as freelancers by commission. Those people never had job security and now AI is coming to wipe out their market. It must be extremely frustrating.

Some people believe that the general public will tire of the AI art "style," which is still easily identifiable in most cases, but I don't think that's true. LLMs will continue to evolve and produce more varied, more sophisticated, and more faithful images. Besides, in 99% of cases, people just want to generate a sexy lady or a photorealistic Pokémon or a meme or whatever. They don't need a genius to do it. And as long as it continues to be cheaper than paying an artist, they will certainly prefer it.
 
Sigh... Here I go again... The artist yaps about generative AI art...
It's a plague, it's not only putting people out of work in an already shitty field where people didn't get paid as it was, it's also making all these randoms on the Internet think they're artists.
Writing a prompt for 10 minute or hey, maybe even an hour or two if you're THAT slow, is nothing in comparison to the years artists take to master their craft. No, your AI doesn't make art "better" than other real artists, wanna know why? Because no hand drawn human made art is "bad". Art is subjective and art is a mountain that people climb, "But destinyduelist, if art is subjective how come AI art isn't?" because AI art isn't art. Something that isn't art to begin with can't be "bad". Generative AI art is theft, you're stealing artwork because how do you think those AI models were trained? AI art isn't art simply because there was no effort or emotion put into the piece. And no, you the person that wrote the prompt doesn't count. Your emotion written onto some generative AI isn't real, it belongs to the 1's and 0's of the machine you just fed. Your thoughts and feelings are no longer your own, you've given full custody of them to the machine, and the machine can't feel them when creating "your" art, because it's exactly that. A machine. A feelingless, soulless slop machine generating thousands upon thousands of images that look identical to yours. You're not special, you didn't create anything unique, you just feed the slop machine to generate another image of an anime character that looks almost near identical to the one thousands of other people did. You're not only tracing, but you're doing an advanced version of it.
Generative AI isn't just plauging art, so much of it is being used for music too now, for lyrics, even for voice acting if you've been keeping up with what Ubislop is doing.
Now, look, I know some people here are going to get really really offended, so let me just say this all applies to people who use it for COMMERICAL PURPOSES. I don't give a damn if you're sitting at home generating Bart Simpson doing backflips on your computer and laughing at how shit it all looks. Unfortunately we can't stop the process and development of generative AI so I can't blame people who just want to try and see what it's all about. But when people start claiming themselves as "AI artists" or even worse trying to advertise themselves using it or selling it in any way shape or form, that's when it becomes a problem. That's when you've become part of the machine.
As for generative AI being used as a tool, I mean yeah, that was it's intended purpose. I don't use it at all, but I can see it being applied as a tool to speed up mundane tasks. I don't really know personally what you'd use it for specifically since if I can't draw a hand or something I'll take a picture of my own, but I'm sure there's more niche places where people could apply it.
These are exactly my thoughts on this topic. I wanted to see if most of the people agree, since I was curious, but really AI creations which would usually require some creative thinking are all slop, AI steals from the artist without remorse, ignoring if its free to use or not.

And yeah, companies which make AI versions of their voice actors while having more than enough money to pay them are just as much of the problem. These kinds of AI inputs are just shit

AI as a tool to search information, okay, that was its initial purpose. In my view, thats no diferent than what a browser does; You input the information you want to search, you get a result.

On the other hand, for art... just no.

As an artist, I understand if youre using it to, as you said, generate images which are not for commercial use and just for fun. Although this does contribute to the problem, there is no stopping people from just generating things they wont profit off. But for comanies and people using it to generate revenue, those are the true cause of the problem

Maybe my explaination didnt make much sense, but its basically what you said for anyone not wanting to read lol, you worded it perfectly ::thumbsupwario
Post automatically merged:

I like AI art when it used to make racist pictures.
here goes the edgelord...
Post automatically merged:

Its a genie who has been let out of the bottle. It WILL become indistinguishable from actual art one day (sooner than we'd like) and we all WILL be worse off because of it.

However, I do find it funny that people would say "its theft" on a forum that is based around sharing roms. A lot of people think that is theft too (I don't).
Is the AI just emulating art?
I mean, both are theft. But i'd say.. if we're talking about morals, it'd be better to steal from a multi-million dollar company than an artist. Especially if the company doesnt produce the games anymore

But yeah, both are theft, and for AI art, we will all be affected negatively because of it
 
Last edited:
For your consideration...

Some years ago I started a small business with the goal of creating tabletop games of all kinds. I hired an artist to do the art as I am no artist. I payed for their work out of my "real job" wages while I went un-payed for doing all of the other work: Game design, Writing, all the other business stuff like webpage etc. I was having constant issues with them making deadlines, and I was not unreasonable with work loads. After about 8 months they flaked out completely and quit. Mind you I payed for every piece they did for me, on time, I gave them creative license, even bought them equipment and supplies.

It sank my company before it even got started.

Even if I could find another artist that does the style I was looking for, I could never have been able to pay them to not only do the pieces i need at the time but to go back and re-do all of the work that was already done so that things would match stylistically.

In more recent times I have started working on one of my games again. I am only able to do this because I can use AI art instead of fighting with an artist. To be clear the game I am working on is totally free to play and not dependent on art to be played.

I am just one person doing this all on my own, its a passion project, and if you ask me a pretty fun game to play.

What am I to do? Stop working on one of the few things that bring me joy?
 
For your consideration...

Some years ago I started a small business with the goal of creating tabletop games of all kinds. I hired an artist to do the art as I am no artist. I payed for their work out of my "real job" wages while I went un-payed for doing all of the other work: Game design, Writing, all the other business stuff like webpage etc. I was having constant issues with them making deadlines, and I was not unreasonable with work loads. After about 8 months they flaked out completely and quit. Mind you I payed for every piece they did for me, on time, I gave them creative license, even bought them equipment and supplies.

It sank my company before it even got started.

Even if I could find another artist that does the style I was looking for, I could never have been able to pay them to not only do the pieces i need at the time but to go back and re-do all of the work that was already done so that things would match stylistically.

In more recent times I have started working on one of my games again. I am only able to do this because I can use AI art instead of fighting with an artist. To be clear the game I am working on is totally free to play and not dependent on art to be played.

I am just one person doing this all on my own, its a passion project, and if you ask me a pretty fun game to play.

What am I to do? Stop working on one of the few things that bring me joy?
I mean, if youre not getting money for it, I guess its alright. Still, when you use AI art for things like these, youre just training AI to steal more art, so I wouldnt do it + youre compromising the quality of the game and luring out players with that

But if it brings you joy, then, do what makes you happy. Questions like the one you asked on the end of your post are unnecessary if this is how you feel
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Latest Threads

Could somebody explains the "art style shift" we got between the late 60's to the mid 2000's?

I have noticed how you could quickly guess the era of a manga or anime just by looking at the...
Read more

You have 3 wishes, what will you wish for?

My wishes are:

1. Alot Of Money
2. Be smart in making Money
3. Solve world hunger
Read more

Creepy kids show characters and weird dialoge.

Hello did you ever see a carton or kid's show which have a weird character? Well for example I...
Read more

Whats the most embarrassing thing you've done?

Hi.

The most embarrassing thing that happened In my life was not being able to hold back my...
Read more

Creative Writing Central

This has nothing to do with the writers guild, its about the hobby itself.

Since creative...​
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
109
Guests online
369
Total visitors
478

Forum statistics

Threads
5,741
Messages
140,865
Members
352,152
Latest member
ERROR404GAMING

Support us

Back
Top