Random Why Felix keeps winking at me

pHoeniX_WRIght said:
Eh it's okay ::dkapproves
My man, you're asking me to sue Instructor Trepe, the queen of ff8. I'll have to consider my position here carefully
Click to expand...
Bro is careful with it
Lin Manuel Miranda Love GIF by Tony Awards
 
Okay, so upon further consideration of the facts regarding my client's request I've come to the conclusion that...
Instructor Trepe, you have accused my client of something without sufficient evidence to support your claims, and as we all know, this is not something the law can just turn a blind eye to.
However! Since it's well, YOU, I'll consider NOT sueing you if you reconsider your claims against my client, and uh... Ha! That's an interesting triple triad collection you got there isn't it?
Post automatically merged:

I'll now be taking a rather long recess, so I suggest you think long and hard about this ::agree
 
pHoeniX_WRIght said:
Okay, so upon further consideration of the facts regarding my client's request I've come to the conclusion that...
Instructor Trepe, you have accused my client of something without sufficient evidence to support your claims, and as we all know, this is not something the law can just turn a blind eye to.
However! Since it's well, YOU, I'll consider NOT sueing you if you reconsider your claims against my client, and uh... Ha! That's an interesting triple triad collection you got there isn't it?
Post automatically merged:

I'll now be taking a rather long recess, so I suggest you think long and hard about this ::agree
Click to expand...
The "Actual Malice Standard" does not apply in this case:

. The Sullivan court stated that "actual malice" means that the defendant said the defamatory statement "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." The Sullivan court also held that when the standard is actual malice, the plaintiff must prove actual malice by " clear and convincing " evidence, rather than the usual burden of proof in a civil case, which is the preponderance of the evidence standard. On this point, the precise language the Sullivan court uses is that the plaintiff must show "the convincing clarity which the constitutional standard demands."

I made no claims, as I have previously stated,
Post automatically merged:

pHoeniX_WRIght said:
Okay, so upon further consideration of the facts regarding my client's request I've come to the conclusion that...
Instructor Trepe, you have accused my client of something without sufficient evidence to support your claims, and as we all know, this is not something the law can just turn a blind eye to.
However! Since it's well, YOU, I'll consider NOT sueing you if you reconsider your claims against my client, and uh... Ha! That's an interesting triple triad collection you got there isn't it?
Post automatically merged:

I'll now be taking a rather long recess, so I suggest you think long and hard about this ::agree
Click to expand...
Hmm...it seems I've been very bad!
Post automatically merged:

Capricorn_is_Goat said:
The "Actual Malice Standard" does not apply in this case:

. The Sullivan court stated that "actual malice" means that the defendant said the defamatory statement "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." The Sullivan court also held that when the standard is actual malice, the plaintiff must prove actual malice by " clear and convincing " evidence, rather than the usual burden of proof in a civil case, which is the preponderance of the evidence standard. On this point, the precise language the Sullivan court uses is that the plaintiff must show "the convincing clarity which the constitutional standard demands."

I made no claims, as I have previously stated,
Post automatically merged:


Hmm...it seems I've been very bad!
Click to expand...

Here is argumentative evidence:
claim​

/klām/​

noun​

  1. A demand for something as rightful or due.
  2. A basis for demanding something; a title or right.
  3. Something claimed in a formal or legal manner, especially a tract of public land staked out by a miner or homesteader.
  4. A demand for payment in accordance with an insurance policy or other formal arrangement.
  5. The sum of money demanded.
  6. A statement of something as a fact; an assertion of truth.
    makes no claim to be a cure.

transitive verb​

  1. To demand, ask for, or take as one's own or one's due.
    claim a reward; claim one's luggage at the airport carousel.
  2. To take in a violent manner as if by right.
    a hurricane that claimed two lives.
  3. To state to be true, especially when open to question; assert or maintain.
    claimed he had won the race; a candidate claiming many supporters.
  4. To deserve or call for; require.
    problems that claim her attention.

idiom​

  1. (lay claim to) To assert one's right to or ownership of.
Post automatically merged:

Capricorn_is_Goat said:
The "Actual Malice Standard" does not apply in this case:

. The Sullivan court stated that "actual malice" means that the defendant said the defamatory statement "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." The Sullivan court also held that when the standard is actual malice, the plaintiff must prove actual malice by " clear and convincing " evidence, rather than the usual burden of proof in a civil case, which is the preponderance of the evidence standard. On this point, the precise language the Sullivan court uses is that the plaintiff must show "the convincing clarity which the constitutional standard demands."

I made no claims, as I have previously stated,
Post automatically merged:


Hmm...it seems I've been very bad!
Post automatically merged:


Here is argumentative evidence:​

claim​

/klām/​

noun​

  1. A demand for something as rightful or due.
  2. A basis for demanding something; a title or right.
  3. Something claimed in a formal or legal manner, especially a tract of public land staked out by a miner or homesteader.
  4. A demand for payment in accordance with an insurance policy or other formal arrangement.
  5. The sum of money demanded.
  6. A statement of something as a fact; an assertion of truth.
    makes no claim to be a cure.

transitive verb​

  1. To demand, ask for, or take as one's own or one's due.
    claim a reward; claim one's luggage at the airport carousel.
  2. To take in a violent manner as if by right.
    a hurricane that claimed two lives.
  3. To state to be true, especially when open to question; assert or maintain.
    claimed he had won the race; a candidate claiming many supporters.
  4. To deserve or call for; require.
    problems that claim her attention.

idiom​

  1. (lay claim to) To assert one's right to or ownership of.
Click to expand...
Here was my original post I was accused of:
jfc said:
So why the hell was this thread locked in the first place anyway?
Click to expand...
I think it was just an excuse for circo64 to reach 500 post count

Fantasy Sigh GIF by Pixel Bandits

Post automatically merged:

Capricorn_is_Goat said:
The "Actual Malice Standard" does not apply in this case:

. The Sullivan court stated that "actual malice" means that the defendant said the defamatory statement "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." The Sullivan court also held that when the standard is actual malice, the plaintiff must prove actual malice by " clear and convincing " evidence, rather than the usual burden of proof in a civil case, which is the preponderance of the evidence standard. On this point, the precise language the Sullivan court uses is that the plaintiff must show "the convincing clarity which the constitutional standard demands."

I made no claims, as I have previously stated,
Post automatically merged:


Hmm...it seems I've been very bad!
Post automatically merged:


Here is argumentative evidence:​

claim​

/klām/​

noun​

  1. A demand for something as rightful or due.
  2. A basis for demanding something; a title or right.
  3. Something claimed in a formal or legal manner, especially a tract of public land staked out by a miner or homesteader.
  4. A demand for payment in accordance with an insurance policy or other formal arrangement.
  5. The sum of money demanded.
  6. A statement of something as a fact; an assertion of truth.
    makes no claim to be a cure.

transitive verb​

  1. To demand, ask for, or take as one's own or one's due.
    claim a reward; claim one's luggage at the airport carousel.
  2. To take in a violent manner as if by right.
    a hurricane that claimed two lives.
  3. To state to be true, especially when open to question; assert or maintain.
    claimed he had won the race; a candidate claiming many supporters.
  4. To deserve or call for; require.
    problems that claim her attention.

idiom​

  1. (lay claim to) To assert one's right to or ownership of.
Post automatically merged:


Here was my original post I was accused of:

I think it was just an excuse for circo64 to reach 500 post count

Fantasy Sigh GIF by Pixel Bandits
Click to expand...
*Quistis defense rests*
 
Last edited:
Capricorn_is_Goat said:
The "Actual Malice Standard" does not apply in this case:

. The Sullivan court stated that "actual malice" means that the defendant said the defamatory statement "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not." The Sullivan court also held that when the standard is actual malice, the plaintiff must prove actual malice by " clear and convincing " evidence, rather than the usual burden of proof in a civil case, which is the preponderance of the evidence standard. On this point, the precise language the Sullivan court uses is that the plaintiff must show "the convincing clarity which the constitutional standard demands."

I made no claims, as I have previously stated,
Post automatically merged:


Hmm...it seems I've been very bad!
Post automatically merged:


Here is argumentative evidence:​

claim​

/klām/​

noun​

  1. A demand for something as rightful or due.
  2. A basis for demanding something; a title or right.
  3. Something claimed in a formal or legal manner, especially a tract of public land staked out by a miner or homesteader.
  4. A demand for payment in accordance with an insurance policy or other formal arrangement.
  5. The sum of money demanded.
  6. A statement of something as a fact; an assertion of truth.
    makes no claim to be a cure.

transitive verb​

  1. To demand, ask for, or take as one's own or one's due.
    claim a reward; claim one's luggage at the airport carousel.
  2. To take in a violent manner as if by right.
    a hurricane that claimed two lives.
  3. To state to be true, especially when open to question; assert or maintain.
    claimed he had won the race; a candidate claiming many supporters.
  4. To deserve or call for; require.
    problems that claim her attention.

idiom​

  1. (lay claim to) To assert one's right to or ownership of.
Post automatically merged:


Here was my original post I was accused of:

I think it was just an excuse for circo64 to reach 500 post count

Fantasy Sigh GIF by Pixel Bandits

Post automatically merged:


*Quistis defense rests*
Click to expand...
"Hold it!"
Video Game Reaction GIF by CAPCOM

Ohhh, so you’re a legal expert now? You’re out here making borderline slanderous statements like you’ve passed the bar exam. Hope you’ve got a lawyer on speed dial, buddy.
You do realize that what you just said falls under the legal definition of implied defamatory insinuation, right? Courts have ruled on cases exactly like this, where vague statements like yours have been considered defamatory because they imply a false and damaging fact. Just saying ‘I think’ doesn’t always protect you—it’s about how a ‘reasonable person’ would interpret it. I mean, I don't want to sue you, but someone else might. Care to reconsider, Instructor?
Post automatically merged:

ciro64 said:
I yield

View attachment 33642
Click to expand...
Hold up let me cook bro
 
pHoeniX_WRIght said:
"Hold it!"
Video Game Reaction GIF by CAPCOM

Ohhh, so you’re a legal expert now? You’re out here making borderline slanderous statements like you’ve passed the bar exam. Hope you’ve got a lawyer on speed dial, buddy.
You do realize that what you just said falls under the legal definition of implied defamatory insinuation, right? Courts have ruled on cases exactly like this, where vague statements like yours have been considered defamatory because they imply a false and damaging fact. Just saying ‘I think’ doesn’t always protect you—it’s about how a ‘reasonable person’ would interpret it. I mean, I don't want to sue you, but someone else might. Care to reconsider, Instructor?
Post automatically merged:


Hold up let me cook bro
Click to expand...
I was never looking for a sue to begin. It was you and Ciro64 that brought up it up in the first place. I never said anything about passing bar either, didn't even imply that. Yes, sometimes cases do just judged guilty based on what you said. I used local evidence, where cases like this been found a non-guilty verdict. I still stand by what I said, be because there was no "implication" on my part that the post was just for 500. I didn't SERIOULY think it was.

Remember, YOU brought up charges. If you continue, you'll have to show proof beyond standard "burden of proof" that I actually thought Ciro64 only did make it for 500 post count. That's going to be very hard, on your side, since this is a public forum and I'm allotted limited First Amendment freedoms therein. So, since my first argument was not good enough (and I'm not sure why you think it's me suing when YOU brought up charges):


My post is protected under First Amendment speech. It didn't violate forum rules in any matter. And on top of that Circo64's reputation was damaged in no way. To the contrary- they were rewarded with 500 post reward. My above defense still applies too. It wasn't defamation, my intention was not in a disparaging manner, which you would have to prove with "Implication Defamation".
 
Capricorn_is_Goat said:
I was never looking for a sue to begin. It was you and Ciro64 that brought up it up in the first place. I never said anything about passing bar either, didn't even imply that. Yes, sometimes cases do just judged guilty based on what you said. I used local evidence, where cases like this been found a non-guilty verdict. I still stand by what I said, be because there was no "implication" on my part that the post was just for 500. I didn't SERIOULY think it was.

Remember, YOU brought up charges. If you continue, you'll have to show prove beyond standard "burden of proof" that I actually thought Ciro64 only did make it for 500 post count. That's going to be very hard, on your side, since this is a public forum and I'm allotted limited First Amendment freedoms therein. So, since my first argument was not good enough (and I'm not sure why you think it's me suing when YOU brought up charges):


My post is protected under First Amendment speech. It didn't violate forum rules in any matter. And on top of that Circo64's reputation was damaged in no way. To the contrary- they were rewarded with 500 post reward. My above defense still applies too. It wasn't defamation, my intention was not in a disparaging manner, which you would have to prove with "Implication Defamation".
Click to expand...
Ayo, serious talk, this is just a joke on my part, I'm doing this in a light hearted way and I find it fun so I would like to continue this back and forth with you, IF you're not bothered by this IRL, so we cool? I'm just saying this because I can't figure out if you're taking this seriously or not lmao
 
it's funny, and I know you meant it as much, but it is a little stressful, yeah.

I've actually been arrested before, for simply entering a stranger's house uninvited while I was going through a "Schizophrenic Episode" as they are called. I wasn't violent in anyway. I just went in their house and sat down on a couch. said nothing. It freaked them out bad though. It was considered Class A Misdemeanor. The charges got expunged from my record with no sentencing during my trial (which was just standing in front of a judge- non jury forum style.) Lots of ppl were there for sentencing.

American Justice System works against people like me fundamentally. That's a whole political thread on it own, and I'm not going there.

Had fun though! Good debate!
Post automatically merged:

I didn't mean it to be stressful. It was just an honest answer. It happened years ago. Everything is OK with it now.
Post automatically merged:

Capricorn_is_Goat said:
it's funny, and I know you meant it as much, but it is a little stressful, yeah.

I've actually been arrested before, for simply entering a stranger's house uninvited while I was going through a "Schizophrenic Episode" as they are called. I wasn't violent in anyway. I just went in their house and sat down on a couch. said nothing. It freaked them out bad though. It was considered Class A Misdemeanor. The charges got expunged from my record with no sentencing during my trial (which was just standing in front of a judge- non jury forum style.) Lots of ppl were there for sentencing.

American Justice System works against people like me fundamentally. That's a whole political thread on it own, and I'm not going there.

Had fun though! Good debate!
Post automatically merged:

I didn't mean it to be stressful. It was just an honest answer. It happened years ago. Everything is OK with it now.
Click to expand...
"Are we cool?!"
"Yeah, we're cool." *sings* runnin around robbin banks all wacked on the scoobie snacks
 
Last edited:
Capricorn_is_Goat said:
it's funny, and I know you meant it as much, but it is a little stressful, yeah.

I've actually been arrested before, for simply entering a stranger's house uninvited while I was going through a "Schizophrenic Episode" as they are called. I wasn't violent in anyway. I just went in their house and sat down on a couch. said nothing. It freaked them out bad though. It was considered Class A Misdemeanor. The charges got expunged from my record with no sentencing during my trial (which was just standing in front of a judge- non jury forum style.) Lots of ppl were there for sentencing.

American Justice System works against people like me fundamentally. That's a whole political thread on it own, and I'm not going there.

Had fun though! Good debate!
Click to expand...
Oh I had no idea! GGs my man, I cooked up a really good Ace Attorney-style reponse to you but it's okay I don't wanna bother you! My sister-in-law also had some "episodes" similar to yours (I think), so I kinda have some idea what it looks like. And well, I just want to say you got this, always trust youself!
So I hope you have a great time around here bud, If you ever wanna chat about FF8 or anything else feel free to do so! ::drink ::bigboss
 
pHoeniX_WRIght said:
Oh I had no idea! GGs my man, I cooked up a really good Ace Attorney-style reponse to you but it's okay I don't wanna bother you! My sister-in-law also had some "episodes" similar to yours (I think), so I kinda have some idea what it looks like. And well, I just want to say you got this, always trust youself!
So I hope you have a great time around here bud, If you ever wanna chat about FF8 or anything else feel free to do so! ::drink ::bigboss
Click to expand...
this place is great, yeah :) ppl are great here <3
 
@Capricorn_is_Goat I'm glad everything is ok now! Sounds like a rough thing for you and @pHoeniX_WRIght 's sister to go through.

And yeah, RGT is full of nice and chill people!

1740703401689.png


Stupid cat... I thought he wanted to stir up chaos, turns out all he wanted was for us to show love and support for each other.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Connect with us

Latest Threads

Character Interpretation: Optimus Prime

TL;DR I ramble about fictional robots to share a snapshot of my history with the genre and...​
Read more

FE Fates: Revelation, starring you! Episode 8: Surf N' Turf

in 2015 (tecnically 2016 in the US but who's counting) they made a game called fire emblem fates...
Read more

Legend of Ethereal (The RGT story series) - Chapter One: Snow Fairy

MEMORABLE GAME QUOTES!

“The Legend Will Never Die…” - SoulCalibur

“Long hairpin right!” - Sega Rally Championship

“Aw...
Read more

Are there good Vita3K drivers for phones with Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chips?

I have a Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro and wanted to play Ninja Gaiden Sigma but it always crashes...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
207
Guests online
332
Total visitors
539
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
4,993
Messages
120,188
Members
313,488
Latest member
yaypanda

Support us

Back
Top