Because they fucking suck lmao
Yea, I really hate that essayists keeping spewing the same old argument and act 2deep4u as if they're original.This also regularly happen in written forms(like essays, thesis, literary analysis, etc) in the "intellectual spheres" is a rather common practice to frequently falling in "circumlocution" discourse(saying the same thing over and over with different wording).
More like repeating a mantra with no though processing or spewing a bunch of canned speeches.Yea, I really hate that essayists keeping spewing the same old argument and act 2deep4u as if they're original.
Oh, that's on point. I also sense a lot of paraphrasing (beating around the bush instead of getting to the point).This also regularly happen in written forms(like essays, thesis, literary analysis, etc) in the "intellectual spheres" is a rather common practice to frequently falling in "circumlocution" discourse(saying the same thing over and over with different wording).
Other way to put it is: "too much theoretical discourse, very little on the practical side"... You need to "land back to earth" your concepts, for example by giving examples or making your listeners apply the concepts you are "teaching".Oh, that's on point. I also sense a lot of paraphrasing (beating around the bush instead of getting to the point).
I really feel that some are confusing intelligence with the ability to employ complex words in long sentences.
We are in a wisdom vs knowledge situation: someone smart would know complex subjects in their entirety, someone wise would manage to explain it as simply as it could get.