hahaha, that's so bad. great cover art. reminds me of aero the acrobat a little
hahaha, that's so bad. great cover art. reminds me of aero the acrobat a little
Really? And i thought its alright but not as bad as the gba port (i didnt even think of it being a bad port cuz i just didnt wanna play the sega genesis or mobile version)Throwing in another shout out for the DS version of Sonic 1.
Just an aweful fucking port.
Close enough for me.Since when does Ubisoft make Japanese RPGs? They just published Lunar DS in America, the game was made by a developer named Japan Art Media with a track record of making bad RPGs (the Aretha series).
I've declined to play tons of titles in the first 5 minutes of test, sometimes for its graphics, or its music, or due to a horrible control or bad gameplay mechanics, so the worst one I continued playing (even I thought it was pure shit) was Rival Turf from SNES.
I have read that those are made for cheap Achievement Farming.I swear 99% of them are just asset flips or cheap meaningless gags to get idiots to drop 50p a pop on the most low-effort drivel you can find.
Yeah you can sort of tell by the reviews going on about easy cards and achievements.I have read that those are made for cheap Achievement Farming.
Apparently there is a whole sector of Steam that competes to see who has the bigger... achievement size. So they farm games that give you trophies for pressing right left right left, etc.
Exactly. Go grind an actual RPG instead of meaningless Pay-To-Win stats.Yeah you can sort of tell by the reviews going on about easy cards and achievements.
Seems dumb to me. I love achievements in games cus they're like an optional extra to collect in games you love. Farming pointless ones seems like a great way to waste time you could be spending playing games that are actually fun.
My cousin actually had this back in the day. Like most of the games he owned, the box and manual had been quickly discarded. I came to learn later if you read the book that you could actually figure out how to play this. However, at the time, we had no clue. Playing it went like this:ET on Atari 2600, i play the game and it was horrible, from graphics to the controller..even if the game is listed on retroachievement.org i wouldn't recommend playing it, there a lot more better game to play then that.
52 games on an NES cartridge?

Yeah, and they all suck. Not to mention the $200 USD price tag, and that was $200 USD in 1991. Adjusted for inflation that would be $475 USD today.52 games on an NES cartridge?![]()