PC The Steam Machine lives!!

Yeah, that seems to be most peoples' concerns right now.
I've been out of the PC spec landscape for years now so it's all Greek to me, but even I reacted to that lol
8gb of vram is like the bare minimum for modern pc gaming these days. At least it's a dedicated GPU with the CPU having 16gb of ram to play with.

I myself probably won't pick up one since I already built a steam machine to play my steam games on my tv, but I can't wait for them to release SteamOS for desktop so I can finally replace Bazzite on it. Don't get me wrong that Bazzite/Chimaera get the job done, but it's definitely lacking features that a Steam Machine should have. There's some games I can't play on it due to controller mapping defaulting to the handheld controller which I can't use since I'm not on a handheld and they lack a controller ordering feature.
 
I gotta say I do not understand any of the hype surrounding this, it feels like it'll fail the same way the last Steam Machine did but I hope I'm just missing something.

It's interesting because from a casual gamer perspective, consoles at this point will still likely have the raw value proposition for purely playing games, but for someone who just wants their PC library in multiple rooms or is looking to jump into the PC space with ease, this should be huge if its priced right. My only worry is stuff like the 8gb of vram already feeling rough in some AAA games released in recent, let alone in 2026 and beyond. Not being upgradable and having less of a raw monetary value prop compared to just buying a used PS5 for like $250 makes it feel like a bit of a hard sell for anyone console only or anyone who cares about their setup being more future proof.

When I first heard about it, I was hella excited but the more I think about it, the less I really understand who exactly it's supposed to be for broadly. It has to be cheap enough that it feels like a decent alternative building an equivalently powered traditional PC but idrk if that's possible. $500-600 feels like about as high as it can go while still making a lot of sense, but even then, I'm just not sure who's gonna be excited for something that by some accounts could struggle with AAA in as early as 2-3 years and is already gonna have issues on some games. Are people really gonna get stoked to buy a box that has them running lower settings in a couple years that doesn't have the upgrade path of a traditional PC?

Idk why the original Steam Machine from the 2010s alongside other attempts at making a PC that mirrors a more console-esque experience failed, but surely all of this pondering has something to do with it. A big appeal of PC is the fact that you have more control and customization with both software and hardware, after all.

Like obviously anyone with a Steam library that this appeals to for any reason should likely get it unless the MSRP is ludicrous, but how many people out there already have a PC and are looking to get a second budget PC? How many people with outdated rigs are gonna wanna bottleneck their upgrade path by getting a Machine over just buying straight upgrades or even building an equivalent rig that they can further power up?

When it comes to existing console users maybe making the jump, you have 1-2 generations worth of games build up that you can't instantly take to PC. For someone entrenched in that space you have to offer more than just a box that can only somewhat outdo a 5 year old console at roughly the same price point, especially when again stuff like 8gb of vram is gonna mean that a lot of games won't really see drastic improvements over what you already get on PS5. The PS5 is still a great 1080p 60fps machine and this seems to be about the same on average with more demanding titles. I want to be more optimistic, but I don't really see existing PC players rushing out to get something like this as it lacks the handheld novelty of a Steam Deck and obviously won't compete with most people's existing rigs in a meaningful way. Again, potentially a cheap second setup to access your Steam library in multiple rooms of the house? Niche but sure ig. It won't entice most entrenched console players especially this late into a console generation. I do not know what person has built a library of PlayStation software since potentially 2013 that is gonna want a Steam Machine in 2026 when the PS6 is expected to launch in 2027. Maybe they're someone on the fence and this gives them a safe, accessible way to jump on board, but that has to be a pretty niche scenario, right?

Who is this really for?
 
I gotta say I do not understand any of the hype surrounding this, it feels like it'll fail the same way the last Steam Machine did but I hope I'm just missing something.

It's interesting because from a casual gamer perspective, consoles at this point will still likely have the raw value proposition for purely playing games, but for someone who just wants their PC library in multiple rooms or is looking to jump into the PC space with ease, this should be huge if its priced right. My only worry is stuff like the 8gb of vram already feeling rough in some AAA games released in recent, let alone in 2026 and beyond. Not being upgradable and having less of a raw monetary value prop compared to just buying a used PS5 for like $250 makes it feel like a bit of a hard sell for anyone console only or anyone who cares about their setup being more future proof.

When I first heard about it, I was hella excited but the more I think about it, the less I really understand who exactly it's supposed to be for broadly. It has to be cheap enough that it feels like a decent alternative building an equivalently powered traditional PC but idrk if that's possible. $500-600 feels like about as high as it can go while still making a lot of sense, but even then, I'm just not sure who's gonna be excited for something that by some accounts could struggle with AAA in as early as 2-3 years and is already gonna have issues on some games. Are people really gonna get stoked to buy a box that has them running lower settings in a couple years that doesn't have the upgrade path of a traditional PC?

Idk why the original Steam Machine from the 2010s alongside other attempts at making a PC that mirrors a more console-esque experience failed, but surely all of this pondering has something to do with it. A big appeal of PC is the fact that you have more control and customization with both software and hardware, after all.

Like obviously anyone with a Steam library that this appeals to for any reason should likely get it unless the MSRP is ludicrous, but how many people out there already have a PC and are looking to get a second budget PC? How many people with outdated rigs are gonna wanna bottleneck their upgrade path by getting a Machine over just buying straight upgrades or even building an equivalent rig that they can further power up?

When it comes to existing console users maybe making the jump, you have 1-2 generations worth of games build up that you can't instantly take to PC. For someone entrenched in that space you have to offer more than just a box that can only somewhat outdo a 5 year old console at roughly the same price point, especially when again stuff like 8gb of vram is gonna mean that a lot of games won't really see drastic improvements over what you already get on PS5. The PS5 is still a great 1080p 60fps machine and this seems to be about the same on average with more demanding titles. I want to be more optimistic, but I don't really see existing PC players rushing out to get something like this as it lacks the handheld novelty of a Steam Deck and obviously won't compete with most people's existing rigs in a meaningful way. Again, potentially a cheap second setup to access your Steam library in multiple rooms of the house? Niche but sure ig. It won't entice most entrenched console players especially this late into a console generation. I do not know what person has built a library of PlayStation software since potentially 2013 that is gonna want a Steam Machine in 2026 when the PS6 is expected to launch in 2027. Maybe they're someone on the fence and this gives them a safe, accessible way to jump on board, but that has to be a pretty niche scenario, right?

Who is this really for?

It's for PC gamers with Steam libraries, and the diaspora of gamers who don't, that may be fed up with Xbox, Nintendo, or Playstation.

It's for console gamers unwilling to take the risk or effort to deal with the learning curve of building or buying a traditional gaming PC, who are looking for a simpler choice, a big brand with a fixed console-like performance tier and interface, to take a lot of the headache out of knowing whether games will run on their hardware.

It makes the PC gaming library much more idiot proof, and with Proton being so good, and the Steam Controller 2 offering all the controller features of Steam Deck, improved without any stick drift, it is very likely to be the affordable "future proof" fork in the road, for console gamers to jump off of Xbox, Playstation, or Nintendo.
 
It's for PC gamers with Steam libraries, and the diaspora of gamers who don't, that may be fed up with Xbox, Nintendo, or Playstation.

It's for console gamers unwilling to take the risk or effort to deal with the learning curve of building or buying a traditional gaming PC, who are looking for a simpler choice, a big brand with a fixed console-like performance tier and interface, to take a lot of the headache out of knowing whether games will run on their hardware.

It makes the PC gaming library much more idiot proof, and with Proton being so good, and the Steam Controller 2 offering all the controller features of Steam Deck, improved without any stick drift, it is very likely to be the affordable "future proof" fork in the road, for console gamers to jump off of Xbox, Playstation, or Nintendo.
But for hardware like this in 2026? That does not scream future proof at all. "A PC experience that is about on par with what your consoles already delivers and has delivered for years that will likely get shown up by the next-gen version of your console in 1-2 years that at worst will cost like $100-200 more than the Steam Machine," is not a compelling sales pitch for anyone who isn't impulsive imo. Like if this came out in 2023 sure, but not in 2026.

And for people who already own extensive Steam Libraries with a PC, who is gonna double dip? I'm sure some folks just want a cheap PC to play some games in the living room instead of just their bedroom/study but that's gotta be rare right? No one with a decent or even entry level rig is gonna get anything out of this since it is ostensibly an upper-end entry rig in power and in some key ways is potentially lacking compared to even 5-year-old consoles. Whether Valve wants them to or not those are the main power/value alternatives people will compare it to.

I really want to see it but nothing about this thing's specs or design screams future proof in 2026. When this comes out and almost inevitably is running most games about as well as if slightly better than a PS5/XSX, who is gonna be rushing out to get one to replace their current box? I'm sure there are a handful of users who are fed up with Sony or Microsoft and want to make the leap, but nothing about the Steam Machine's specs imply it is going to give an experience beyond anything like even a PS5 Pro and that certainly isn't gonna entice someone to abandon their existing game library and upgrade. Especially since - I can't repeat this enough - the next-gen consoles are gonna be out and demolish this thing in just 1-2 years while likely costing just a tiny bit more.

As for convenience, it will still never be as convenient as a console by virtue of you still having to check compatibility to some degree, still having to fiddle with settings at least a bit (and even more in the coming years as the hardware ages). Sure, Steam OS is still a far more straightforward platform than Windows or whatever when it comes to going from powering the device on to playing games. Unreal Engine 5 is unfortunately still not going anywhere. If convenience really is a dealbreaker for someone, console still wins in key ways imo.
 
Last edited:
But for hardware like this in 2026? That does not scream future proof at all. "A PC experience that is about on par with what your consoles already delivers and has delivered for years that will likely get shown up by the next-gen version of your console in 1-2 years that at worst will cost like $100-200 more than the Steam Machine," is not a compelling sales pitch for anyone who isn't impulsive imo. Like if this came out in 2023 sure, but not in 2026.

And for people who already own extensive Steam Libraries with a PC, who is gonna double dip? I'm sure some folks just want a cheap PC to play some games in the living room instead of just their bedroom/study but that's gotta be rare right? No one with a decent or even entry level rig is gonna get anything out of this since it is ostensibly an upper-end entry rig in power and in some key ways is potentially lacking compared to even 5-year-old consoles. Whether Valve wants them to or not those are the main power/value alternatives people will compare it to.

I really want to see it but nothing about this thing's specs or design screams future proof in 2026. When this comes out and almost inevitably is running most games about as well as if slightly better than a PS5/XSX, who is gonna be rushing out to get one to replace their current box? I'm sure there are a handful of users who are fed up with Sony or Microsoft and want to make the leap, but nothing about the Steam Machine's specs imply it is going to give an experience beyond anything like even a PS5 Pro and that certainly isn't gonna entice someone to abandon their existing game library and upgrade. Especially since - I can't repeat this enough - the next-gen consoles are gonna be out and demolish this thing in just 1-2 years while likely costing just a tiny bit more.

As for convenience, it will still never be as convenient as a console by virtue of you still having to check compatibility to some degree, still having to fiddle with settings at least a bit (and even more in the coming years as the hardware ages). Sure, Steam OS is still a far more straightforward platform than Windows or whatever when it comes to going from powering the device on to playing games. Unreal Engine 5 is unfortunately still not going anywhere. If convenience really is a dealbreaker for someone, console still wins in key ways imo.

The Steam Deck is 3 and a half years old and still kicks ass in the handheld PC market. Valve can do a lot to keep a small custom desktop PC viable over the same time span, and help new gamers get into the Steam platform which is now in the same announcement rolling out ARM64 compatibility layers.

Future proofing is hitching your wagon to Steam and open PC gaming in general.

Deck is pretty much idiot proof already, and the Steam Machine will take the hassle out of entry level pc gaming. It's not going to be some huge new thing that sells 30 million units and get called a failure. It'll probably sell 5-10 million over the years and still complement the PC market, and still be useful as a PC.
 
The Steam Deck is 3 and a half years old and still kicks ass in the handheld PC market. Valve can do a lot to keep a small custom desktop PC viable over the same time span, and help new gamers get into the Steam platform which is now in the same announcement rolling out ARM64 compatibility layers.

Future proofing is hitching your wagon to Steam and open PC gaming in general.

Deck is pretty much idiot proof already, and the Steam Machine will take the hassle out of entry level pc gaming. It's not going to be some huge new thing that sells 30 million units and get called a failure. It'll probably sell 5-10 million over the years and still complement the PC market, and still be useful as a PC.
Fair enough, I just seriously struggle with understanding why anyone would want these specs in 2026 unless the price is super duper enticing. I'm someone who plays console and PC and the idea of buying a middling PC that is supposed to essentially mimic a console experience when consoles will launch 1-2 years later that will trounce it just does not compute.

It also doesn't really matter if something is idiot proof, anyone who dabbled in emulation should know this. The amount of people who are just terrified to mod their systems no matter how idiot proof the process is, or just insist that emulating is too cumbersome despite most systems and emulators being as easy as playing a digital download of whatever their latest game purchase is, is astounding. Just the thought of potential hang-ups is enough to discourage people, I've begged way too many people to emulate or get into PC gaming to not have the typical responses memorized at this point.

I hope I'm severely underestimating it on some level and/or maybe just being overly cynical about Valve's potential expectations.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Support this Site

RGT relies on you to stay afloat. Help covering the site costs and get some pretty Level 7 perks too.

Featured Video

Latest Threads

Steam's Hardware Announcement Thoughts

So I know I'm gonna get a lot of flack I think because I do think a lot of people will flame me...
Read more

Satoshi Kon's Cinematic Filmography and Susumu Hirasawa's Touching Songs of the Soul

I feel like 《Satoshi Kon》's Works in film should be recognized more in the west than they do in...
Read more

i went down a manga rabbit hole and ordered a mysterious art book. here's what happened.

hiii how is everyone!!!

about two months ago at this point, i made a thread asking about...
Read more

About PS2 and GC emulation on T820 Anbernic devices (RG406H, RG476H, RG Cube...)

I've been told these devices are not the best for PS2 and GC emulation, but they're certainly...
Read more

Are ice levels always the worst?

I tend to really like them (along with ice puzzles and ice physics) because they add variety to...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
50
Guests online
600
Total visitors
650

Forum statistics

Threads
14,813
Messages
355,195
Members
895,303
Latest member
Dysentary

Today's birthdays

Advertisers

Back
Top