- Joined
- Feb 3, 2025
- Messages
- 1,411
- Level up in
- 1088 posts
- Reaction score
- 3,132
- Points
- 3,477
- Location
- Jordan
Yeah just a reminder snakes and alligators are more cute than cats and dogs
I think the opposite of this. If a show isn't hinting me it's going to be consistently good from the get go, I'm not gonna put the effort.I don't think people should judge a show just by watching the very first few episodes of it
Technically speaking, a well-written script should snatch you in the first 15 minutes, so you are right. That's how movie critics go to those festivals and see 10-ish movies in the same day: they watch the first 15 minutes, and if they vibe with it and see good consistency in the first 15 minutes, they stay for the rest of the movie. Otherwise, it is a pass.I think the opposite of this. If a show isn't hinting me it's going to be consistently good from the get go, I'm not gonna put the effort.
I heard something like this yesterday: A proper story unfolds, instead of arbitrarily withholding information from you.Technically speaking, a well-written script should snatch you in the first 15 minutes, so you are right. That's how movie critics go to those festivals and see 10-ish movies in the same day: they watch the first 15 minutes, and if they vibe with it and see good consistency in the first 15 minutes, they stay for the rest of the movie. Otherwise, it is a pass.
Sure, some series are slow-burning, but they shouldn't be meandering. There are signs that they should be good, like making the characters and their motivations clear. Sometimes, the show spends time doing the worldbuilding or has you connect with the characters, and so on. Even slow-paced shows can respect the viewer's time.
don't mind me, I took a bunch of scripting and creative writing classes
I heard something like this yesterday: A proper story unfolds, instead of arbitrarily withholding information from you.
Coming up with twists out of nowhere or making characters appear in places for no reason is already bad enough, but in case of bad series it's very common for them to deliver information as slowly as possible for no good reason. Then put a twist on the ending of the episode just to make it look like that wasn't the case.
A good plot twist is one that when you rewatch you get that "why didn't I notice this hint here" whenever you notice a clue. Withholding information without a good reason is just bad writing even when it doesn't lead to a plot twist.The reader must have equal opportunity with the detective for solving the mystery. All clues must be plainly stated and described.
A movie doesn't last nearly as long as a TV series and it's normal for a TV series to take more time to set up its story considering the scale of it. The "15 minutes rule" does not apply to a longer form of storytelling. While I agree it shouldn't take too, too long, it could very well take a few episodes.Technically speaking, a well-written script should snatch you in the first 15 minutes, so you are right. That's how movie critics go to those festivals and see 10-ish movies in the same day: they watch the first 15 minutes, and if they vibe with it and see good consistency in the first 15 minutes, they stay for the rest of the movie. Otherwise, it is a pass.
Sure, some series are slow-burning, but they shouldn't be meandering. There are signs that they should be good, like making the characters and their motivations clear. Sometimes, the show spends time doing the worldbuilding or has you connect with the characters, and so on. Even slow-paced shows can respect the viewer's time.
don't mind me, I took a bunch of scripting and creative writing classes
i've never watched this movie, but i will agree with you. the only good part is that meme: "run forest run!"Forrest Gump is a terrible movie.
...how would you knowi've never watched this movie, but i will agree with you. the only good part is that meme: "run forest run!"
I agree.Forrest Gump is a terrible movie.
just a guess. that line and the one about the box of chocolate is the only stuff that i've heard about from this movie. i don't know anything else about it. could be a good movie for all i know....how would you know
It’s a somewhat discomforting movie to watch these days.
Yeah, kinda like my favorite anti-Hollywood term; oscarbation.I.E. it's a shitty inspiration porn.
And jenny is the villain of the movie.Forrest Gump is a terrible movie.
And jenny is the villain of the movie.
Depends of which kind.
Jumping spiders are the cutest things ever man. I was deathly afraid of spiders until like 2 months ago, now I absolutely adore tarantulas and other spiders. I have two jumping spiders and I'm gonna get a tarantula soon
this isn't a documentary but this video is over an hour long and is quite interesting.I find to YouTube videos that usually go over 30 minutes to be tedious and always offer not much substance.
Unless it's a documentary.
Ahh hell no bro that's some ungodly unholy torture , you would just grind stuff from monsters still annoying as hell.this isn't a documentary but this video is over an hour long and is quite interesting.
it seems like this guy has only done a couple of videos about this kind of stuff. he made a new one about ff2:Ahh hell no bro that's some ungodly unholy torture , you would just grind stuff from monsters still annoying as hell.
Seems like this "can you beat X game using Y only" took off after giant grant games made his videos like c+"can you beat SC2 using marines only" or "can you beat WarCraft 3 without losing a unit" pioneered this sort of challenges.