- Joined
- Dec 4, 2024
- Messages
- 310
- Level up in
- 190 posts
- Reaction score
- 817
- Points
- 1,477
- Location
- I dunno
I was a 100% referring to gaming, trust methis sounds like relationship advice

But hey, if it works, it works.
I was a 100% referring to gaming, trust methis sounds like relationship advice

He was amazing!Frank Sinatra is the best 21° century singer.
Absolutly true .It's perfectly fine to let go of a series of games or whatever if you feel disappointed or don't feel like giving it any more chances. There's no reason to stick around to a series that keeps making mistakes in hopes of someday expecting it to get better or whatever.
Sometimes it's better to just move on.
Yeah, or at least peaks and valleys when it comes to quality, although where the peaks and valleys actually are can be subjective to an extent.Absolutly true .
No game-series can hold on for what they are and what kind of quality they brought to the table forever.
The best games / movies / comics / etc. have an end .
i like sloppy joes, but i'd rather just eat the stuff by itself, not on a hamburger bun. that ruins it in my opinion.Sloppy Joes suck. I don't know why people like Sloppy Joes.
pokemon runs on the "you only die in cutscenes" logic. if it doesn't happen in a cutscene, it don't count.I thought they died well I'm not into pokemon.
True and i agree . But what happens when the peaks and valleys getting flatter and flatter ?Yeah, or at least peaks and valleys when it comes to quality, although where the peaks and valleys actually are can be subjective to an extent.
Very well said. I guess the question becomes then "How flat are we ready to accept our peaks become?"True and i agree . But what happens when the peaks and valleys getting flatter and flatter ?
Those game-series becoming mediocre experiences . And this happens to many game-series lately and even back then .
At the end our subjectivity is the main-point what we prefer from those games and what are our highs and lows in the series determined for what we stand as fans of the franchise .
I meant 20, me dumb.He was amazing!
But...I...I'm sorry, there's a pedantic thing inside me compelling me to type. He died in 98, he never saw the 21st century!

Touche , my friend . Touche .Very well said. I guess the question becomes then "How flat are we ready to accept our peaks become?"
Nah it's just a typo! I just couldn't resist, jerk that I am. Sorry about that.I meant 20, me dumb.![]()
If you'll humor me with a practical example of my own experience for a minute:Touche , my friend . Touche .
I completly agree . Nothing to add from my side .If you'll humor me with a practical example of my own experience for a minute:
Monster Hunter is my favorite franchise, and it's interesting how those "in", that is, those that play regularly and know the series and those "out", those that look at the series from the outside both tend to complain that the series is becoming stale and far too accommodating to newcomers with each new iteration, haha.
I prefer the classic style, but heck, let people try it, see if they enjoy it. Those that enjoy the core loop will stay, maybe become true fans, those that don't will move on, milk what they can of the newness of the latest entry and then move on to the next big release. Isn't that the same with every game? no harm, no foul.
Sloppy Joes are to Mexican food what Little Caesars is to real pizza.❉ It's a bastard imitation of something that was designed properly for the same purpose. Burger buns were never made to hold those contents, while tortillas can do it perfectly fine.i like sloppy joes, but i'd rather just eat the stuff by itself, not on a hamburger bun. that ruins it in my opinion.
i've never had little ceasars, so i'll take your word on that.Sloppy Joes are to Mexican food what Little Caesars is to real pizza.❉ It's a bastard imitation of something that was designed properly for the same purpose. Burger buns were never made to hold those contents, while tortillas can do it perfectly fine.
❉ I never had a LC pizza that didn't fall apart upon opening the box. And I never had a pizza from an actual good pizza place that did that.
I'll be honest, I never took classic MK seriously enough to even think about it as anything more than a spammy laughfest, but it's cool to see a different perspective. I won't deny my brain is wired much more closely to Capcom and SNK fighting games, and that hasn't changed.May or may not be a hot take, depending on who you ask, but having played them a fair deal at a high level, I'll stand on the hill that classic Mortal Kombat, particularly UMK3, are good fighting games. I hear a fair bit of slander about them these days, but I think a lot of it comes from people that haven't taken the time to really learn the games, as they are very different both gameplay and meta-wise than Capcom and SNK fighters.
I wouldn't fault someone for simply not caring for the gameplay, given how different it is, but I still think they're good games.
Like you said, it's a subjective thing.Yeah, or at least peaks and valleys when it comes to quality, although where the peaks and valleys actually are can be subjective to an extent.
Exactly. In the end this is the only metric a person can really measure.So in the end, I'd say what matters is "you". As in, are YOU enjoying it or not.
It's not often I hear people badmouth classic MK apart from 4, which isn't even that bad actually.May or may not be a hot take, depending on who you ask, but having played them a fair deal at a high level, I'll stand on the hill that classic Mortal Kombat, particularly UMK3, are good fighting games. I hear a fair bit of slander about them these days, but I think a lot of it comes from people that haven't taken the time to really learn the games, as they are very different both gameplay and meta-wise than Capcom and SNK fighters.
I wouldn't fault someone for simply not caring for the gameplay, given how different it is, but I still think they're good games.
The first 2 games were not bad for their times. Fighting games were still pretty simple and MK offered a similar experience. The only things they got wrong was standardizing the normals to the point that only a few characters had any unique ones. (Though the single player game had a lot of balance issues and cheating, albeit less than later on. That also existed in other fighting games of the time, but MK was always the king of unfair single player mode.)May or may not be a hot take, depending on who you ask, but having played them a fair deal at a high level, I'll stand on the hill that classic Mortal Kombat, particularly UMK3, are good fighting games. I hear a fair bit of slander about them these days, but I think a lot of it comes from people that haven't taken the time to really learn the games, as they are very different both gameplay and meta-wise than Capcom and SNK fighters.
I wouldn't fault someone for simply not caring for the gameplay, given how different it is, but I still think they're good games.