I played Deadly Towers quite a bit years ago. Yes, it's a frustratingly hard game, but that's just it. It's Hard, not awful.
agree with all of these (though Superstars could have been just a little bit better)
Not really. Yeah, it's brutally difficult, but it's nowhere near as bad as say... X7.megaman & bass is ass
Agreed, I actually like the fact that they didn't just toss out a Zelda 1 clone, change a few things, and say "here you go." They tried something different. Yes, it's a fucking hard game, but like I said about Deadly Towers, it's hard, not awful.Zelda 2: The Adventure of Link. It's the champion of misunderstood games.
I disagree with Castlevania 2. It's somehow even MORE cryptic than Zelda 2. Like, a first time player isn't going to know how to do that tornado thing where you equip the Red Crystal and then crouch for a few seconds. It's also not clear where the hell you need to go most of the time.Zelda II and Castlevania II: Simon's Quest. Honestly replaying Simon´s quest in the Anniversary collection the game was rather fun heck I even ejoyed castlevania legends.
I agree. The Lost Levels is not that hard and wasn't bad. Players just don't want a good challenge for some dumb reason. It's more of a DLC pack anyway and it has a fair challenge. Plus, Luigi is playable instead of being player two.