he makes dick jokes. that's enough.VeryI never got why yhatzee's so popular
I remember he really hated metal gear solid 4 haha
Funny. When I played it, I thought it was much worse than the Youtubers said.Starfox Adventures.
It's a million miles away from being perfect, and it's frontloaded with all the good parts, but I think it's an overall enjoyable game.
It's probably because I liked it as a kid and was surprised at the JonTron video lambasting it a hundred years ago. Nowadays I can assume there are a thousand hour-long videos talking about how it's an underrated masterpiece like any other mediocre game.Funny. When I played it, I thought it was much worse than the Youtubers said.
I think NES Silver Surfer is an alright game, it isn't a masterpiece or anything but it was fine. The only reason people shit on it as much as they do is because of the AVGN video.
Play peace walker and portable ops tooI'm a long time fan of The Rageaholic/Razorfist, a Thief fanboy who has a long standing hate-boner for Metal Gear Solid. Being a huge fan of Thief myself, I found myself avoiding the series for a long time until I realized it would probably be healthier to have my own opinion on them.
Are MGS1~2 broken games without having the radar on? Absolutely. Are some of the boss battles clunky? YES. Is Kojima a pretentious writer? Undoubtedly. But for all the flaws that I see in them, I had a wonderful time with MGS1~3 as well as Metal Gear 1 & 2. If PS3 emulation ever becomes halfway decent, I'm sure I'll have a fun time with MGS4 as well.
I dunno, I think those games were marked as untouchable since the day they released.like Ocarina of Time or Final Fantasy VII
The modern equivalent is sony exclusivesI also feel that Youtubers from a specific generation have put some games on a pedestal to the point they are no longer "criticisable" like Ocarina of Time or Final Fantasy VII and if you dare pointing out even a small flaw you'd get an army of people telling you that you aren't allowed to say that.
I think back then the Internet was barely a thing for the general public and while they were massive success in magazine reviews there was no such thing as "these are the best game ever made, anyone who dislike it isn't a real gamer." or having people saying "you had to be there, if not then you're too young to have the right to judge it".I dunno, I think those games were marked as untouchable since the day they released.
I was almost tempted to say The Last of Us but this game is still quite modern compared to the classics.The modern equivalent is sony exclusives
True I suppose. I dunno if there's anything wrong with "you had to be there" when talking about the immediate cultural impact of something, though, because that's part of the fun when looking back at such events later on imo.I think back then the Internet was barely a thing for the general public and while they were massive success in magazine reviews there was no such thing as "these are the best game ever made, anyone who dislike it isn't a real gamer." or having people saying "you had to be there, if not then you're too young to have the right to judge it".
That's also my issue with the gaming community, apparently if you haven't played a game upon release you are therefore illegitimate to tell anything about one.
Also using the "you had to be there" argument implies that the game is only great because of its context rather than the intrinsic values of said game.
I was almost tempted to say The Last of Us but this game is still quite modern compared to the classics.
There's also the recency bias about many things. I cannot allow myself to call something a masterpiece until it gets some age so we'd have a better point of view of the qualities and impact of a game.True I suppose. I dunno if there's anything wrong with "you had to be there" when talking about the immediate cultural impact of something, though, because that's part of the fun when looking back at such events later on imo.
I wasn't "there" because I was two and three years old respectively when they released.
The issue is that humans are naturally enclined to not want to follow the trend, hating on popular things is actually a popular behaviour. Hipsters are actually not that unique and many people are disliking trendy things for the sake of feeling unique instead of having a proper opinion.Though in general I don't think disparaging opinions are as interesting as positive opinions, so I usually don't see the point in arguing those kinds of opinions on a video game, unless the topic specifically calls for it because in the wrong space it just turns into "I think xyz sucks" vs "I think xyz rocks" without much substance other than the opinions in and of themselves.
I sort of disagree, because I feel that the very definition of something being able to be considered a masterpiece is contemporary. But your approach is valid too.There's also the recency bias about many things. I cannot allow myself to call something a masterpiece until it gets some age so we'd have a better point of view of the qualities and impact of a game.
Sure, but there's no real objectivity to this. The further in the future you are when critiquing old media, the more you have to compare it to (which most people do subconsciously even if they don't want to), while I think that the best way to critiquing old media is by viewing the product through a lens of what was more appropriate when it was new.And if something is truly great then it should be good even if someone finally try it five years after or else it was just good for its epoch.
Michelangelo's Sistine is an absolute masterpiece because of how they managed to produce a quality content for its era.I sort of disagree, because I feel that the very definition of something being able to be considered a masterpiece is contemporary. But your approach is valid too.
I'll say that as important Citizen Kane was for cinema I'd dare saying that aside from personal cinematographic culture I cannot say it could be objectively the best movie ever made, there are too many genres and themes that it would be too complex to properly answer (especially when it's Hollywood-centric most of the time).Sure, but there's no real objectivity to this. The further in the future you are when critiquing old media, the more you have to compare it to (which most people do subconsciously even if they don't want to), while I think that the best way to critiquing old media is by viewing the product through a lens of what was more appropriate when it was new.
It'd be stupid to claim, just for example, that FF7 was automatically workse than FF7R because the graphics are older.
Yes I think the game gets a lot of flak but its quite justified the gameplay isn't the best up until kas'ion I was trying to get maria to not die when touched by the enemy the devs thought its fun idea to make you gain HP only when hit everyone please a hard felt clapping session is needed to congratulate square for that genius design and the dungeons being full of traps I don't give a damn if they want to do me dirty like that I will gladly use the emulator save system to check what's behind that door.Final Fantasy II. While the leveling mechanic is a hassle to manage, in practice, it becomes quite intuitive. What really peeves me about that game is the amount of backtracking and the dungeon layout.
Then that's on you. Everyone uses the tools they had at hand at the time.I think a painting made today of the same level would have a "less impressive value" simply because of modern technologies allowing to do this more easily.
It's important to remember that "i think this is my favorite" doesn't have to equate to "i think this is the best" and it probably never shouldn't, and there are infact some people that are more qualified to critique something than oneself.I'll say that as important Citizen Kane was for cinema I'd dare saying that aside from personal cinematographic culture I cannot say it could be objectively the best movie ever made, there are too many genres and themes that it would be too complex to properly answer (especially when it's Hollywood-centric most of the time).
Well, you're right about how 90% of voice acting in older games are anecdotal at best or awful at worst.My only arbitrary answer is that I think voice acting is a stylistic choice and isn't needed in any game, especially old ones with text.
Maybe? I just found CK to be interesting but calling it the best wouldn't be how I'd qualify it.It's important to remember that "i think this is my favorite" doesn't have to equate to "i think this is the best" and it probably never shouldn't, and there are infact some people that are more qualified to critique something than oneself.
Doesn't mean they're always right of course, but someone who's watched a billion movies is probably in a more knowledgeable position to critique Citizen Kane than someone who's watched a hundred Marvel movies simply because the frame of reference is greater.
It's not, and this opinion generally comes from young people who thinks this because it's the first accessible progressive rock song they ever heard. It's not even in Queen's top 5! ?as great Bohemian Rhapsody is I cannot put it as the objectively best song ever made