News Duckstation dev blocks Arch Linux users, threatens to completely remove Linux support

I heard that Retroarch had stolen his core a while back too. Can we just value and respect our heroes?
Stolen??

Since when is making a proper, fully legal fork of a (at the time) Free Software program, "stealing"?
 
Stolen??

Since when is making a proper, fully legal fork of a (at the time) Free Software program, "stealing"?
Dunno, it's what I heard in the youtuber emulation community. People said the dev didn't consent to it being included. It's not my business since I didn't make it, I just repeat what I heard.
 
Dunno, it's what I heard in the youtuber emulation community. People said the dev didn't consent to it being included. It's not my business since I didn't make it, I just repeat what I heard.
Something something permissive open source license is implicit consent/obviates need for consent.
 
I always find it interesting how often Squarepusher and Themeister (of libretro/RetroArch) mistreat other emudevs until they snap, and somehow the other emudevs always end up being the only ones to catch any flak.

I suppose when you maintain a frontend based on the API Near designed, you probably have more time to manage PR. Especially when a lot of that PR management is done for you by pulling in the emulator cores created by dozens of other real developers and getting to slap your project's name on top of them.

Likewise, I feel Stenzek's pain with having to maintain compatibility with Wayland and the toxic expectations of Linux users. The harassment and abuse game developers and open-source developers face seem to overlap for emulator developers, and they get the worst of both. Plus, the shift to Wayland has led to a lot of extra work for developers not exclusively or primarily targeting the Linux platform. Wayland single-handedly shifted Linux development from *nix-like development to an extra, unique platform on top of the other Unices, similarly to macOS with Quartz.

I won't go too hard in the defense of Stenzek, but if you really want maintained Linux support, it might be a good idea to brush up on the skills and maintain a port yourself. The backend would still be something Stenzek would maintain, but it takes some load off him while spreading out the power he wields controlling the project, even if there's only a shallow fork.

It'd be a win-win.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Support this Site

RGT relies on you to stay afloat. Help covering the site costs and get some pretty Level 7 perks too.

Featured Video

Latest Threads

Best Micro SD card adapter/Flashmasta clone

So I purchased both a NeoGeo Pocket Color & a Wonderswan Color with the intent of fully...
Read more

Talk with me !

This seems to be an interesting topic here. Okay, anyone who wants to ask me questions now has...
Read more

What would you do if RGT goes under/shuts down?

Kaiju movies

General PC Engine Appreciation Thread

Just a place for general PC Engine discussion. Whether it be favourite games, hardware add-ons...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
146
Guests online
243
Total visitors
389

Forum statistics

Threads
12,470
Messages
304,477
Members
865,489
Latest member
RetroModder89

Advertisers

Back
Top