News Duckstation dev blocks Arch Linux users, threatens to completely remove Linux support

I heard that Retroarch had stolen his core a while back too. Can we just value and respect our heroes?
Stolen??

Since when is making a proper, fully legal fork of a (at the time) Free Software program, "stealing"?
 
Stolen??

Since when is making a proper, fully legal fork of a (at the time) Free Software program, "stealing"?
Dunno, it's what I heard in the youtuber emulation community. People said the dev didn't consent to it being included. It's not my business since I didn't make it, I just repeat what I heard.
 
Dunno, it's what I heard in the youtuber emulation community. People said the dev didn't consent to it being included. It's not my business since I didn't make it, I just repeat what I heard.
Something something permissive open source license is implicit consent/obviates need for consent.
 
I always find it interesting how often Squarepusher and Themeister (of libretro/RetroArch) mistreat other emudevs until they snap, and somehow the other emudevs always end up being the only ones to catch any flak.

I suppose when you maintain a frontend based on the API Near designed, you probably have more time to manage PR. Especially when a lot of that PR management is done for you by pulling in the emulator cores created by dozens of other real developers and getting to slap your project's name on top of them.

Likewise, I feel Stenzek's pain with having to maintain compatibility with Wayland and the toxic expectations of Linux users. The harassment and abuse game developers and open-source developers face seem to overlap for emulator developers, and they get the worst of both. Plus, the shift to Wayland has led to a lot of extra work for developers not exclusively or primarily targeting the Linux platform. Wayland single-handedly shifted Linux development from *nix-like development to an extra, unique platform on top of the other Unices, similarly to macOS with Quartz.

I won't go too hard in the defense of Stenzek, but if you really want maintained Linux support, it might be a good idea to brush up on the skills and maintain a port yourself. The backend would still be something Stenzek would maintain, but it takes some load off him while spreading out the power he wields controlling the project, even if there's only a shallow fork.

It'd be a win-win.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Support this Site

RGT relies on you to stay afloat. Help covering the site costs and get some pretty Level 7 perks too.

Featured Video

Latest Threads

A little story about me and you don't know

I was a very restless and messy child, as far as children go, I watched so many DVD movies that...
Read more

Emulation on the series S/X

I have a series S, which sits there unused a lot of the time since I'm much more focused on the...
Read more

Does anyone know how to get access to time trial mode on Ace Driver: Victory Lap?

Foe the namco arcade lovers out there. I've been trying to figure out how to get the time trial...
Read more

I found the Viewtiful Joe TV series

I found the Viewtiful Joe TV series to be a wild and colorful ride that captures the quirky...
Read more

Game Gear to Master System ports?

I know that Ristar Gamegear had a patch to make it work on the Master System but I'm wondering...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
115
Guests online
176
Total visitors
291

Forum statistics

Threads
12,348
Messages
301,724
Members
863,963
Latest member
Franciscoooooo

Advertisers

Back
Top