ignoring all of Curse of Darkness and ruining its main character means it's a good adaptation?
It's a good but different adaption as far as I'm concerned. I never played
CoD, nor the other 3D
Castlevania games, aside from
LoS. I know they were mainly taking from
Castlevania III, and that's good enough for me. I get some scenes didn't land for people, but I wasn't bothered by it. Now maybe they could have toned it down swearing a little bit, but it once again, didn't bother me. Also, the characters swear less in Nocturne, so there you go.
I don't get the shade thrown at VizziePop. I don't care for those shows she makes, but I see no point ragging on her.
Panty and Stocking did a lot of swearing too, but most people praise the show for having more swearing in the English dub. Ironically, Season 2 of
P&S doesn't have as much compared to the first season. This is this doesn't hurt the show at all, but not the exact reason why I like it more than the first season. There is further irony as I've seen plenty fans of VizziePop make crossover art with
Panty and Stocking characters, and/or characters from
Hazbin or
Helluva.
but is as good of an adaptation as the first Street Fighter movie (which I personally and unironically love and think is a great movie)
I find both
Castlevania shows better adaptions, compared to the first
Street Fighter movie, or without.
SF 1994 I really find dull, aside from Julias as Bison, and the guy who played Zangief. The animated
SFII film, and
MK 1995 are so much better in gave us what my older brother and I wanted.