Parallel joystick brethren!... I prefer the symmetrical joystick layout.
Hey now, the PS3 was great. Also I think the 360 “killed” online gaming because it was the first game console to force you to pay for online multiplayer, nobody likes paying for that. Also the 360 was prone to hardware failures and it became a joke in the last few years of it’s life. Also the PS3 had amazing exclusives, don’t know what you’re talking about.Xbox 360 perfected online gaming and the games performed better.
PS3 was a dog's breakfast. Overpriced, buggy games that looked like shit by comparison, dual shock being dismissed as something you shouldn't want or need, the PSN store would lag and crash the console occasionally needing to be reinstalled, you needed to use the PSN store on a PC to actually see some of the games that were missing from the console side, every time you would go to play something it would likely need to download and then have the extra space to unpack updates.
Red Ring of death was more acceptable than the experience of using a PS3. Sony lost their minds with the PS3, then the Vita, screwing everybody. I don't even understand how PS4 or PS5 found success. The only selling point they had going for them was free online, but they paywalled it. They never secured it, leading to the big outage and data breach. The only games worth playing on modern Playstations are typically indie games that were already on Steam. Their first party stuff is big cinematic recycled or remastered ports. Online multiplayer was never Sony's strong suit. They shut it down anyway in their own games.
Playstation doesn't deserve it's customer base. I'll never buy their brand again.
I already explained what I am talking about, and I said the red ring of death is a preferable experience by comparison. The PS3 was half baked from the start.Hey now, the PS3 was great. Also I think the 360 “killed” online gaming because it was the first game console to force you to pay for online multiplayer, nobody likes paying for that. Also the 360 was prone to hardware failures and it became a joke in the last few years of it’s life. Also the PS3 had amazing exclusives, don’t know what you’re talking about.
Installing games was a pain in the ass, not even PC was that slow. OMG Snake smoking for 2 hours installing a videogame thanks Sony.PS3 was a dog's breakfast. Overpriced, buggy games that looked like shit by comparison, dual shock being dismissed as something you shouldn't want or need, the PSN store would lag and crash the console occasionally needing to be reinstalled, you needed to use the PSN store on a PC to actually see some of the games that were missing from the console side, every time you would go to play something it would likely need to download and then have the extra space to unpack updates.
The 360 was the PS2 of that generation. It's the console that had Halo during its peak with Halo 3, had Bioshock first, had Mass Effect first, had timed exclusive Call of Duty map packs when the best Call of Duty games were launching, etc. PS3 took many years to recover and it eventually outsold the 360, however 360 was the mainstream console choice for most, if not all, of that generation. It had way better online, too.I don't think the Xbox 360 was a competitor for the Playstation 3.
I can't argue what actual numbers show. People don't mind paying for playing online as long as they receive extras that are worth it. You describe it like you were just paying for playing online, nothing more, and the monthly subscription was aeons better than the PSN. To sum things up, with 360 you got better online stability and the games that were free as a Gold member are yours forever, even if you cancel your subscription. On the contrary, PSN Plus free games can only be played as long as you have a valid subscription, so you are "renting them".Hey now, the PS3 was great. Also I think the 360 “killed” online gaming because it was the first game console to force you to pay for online multiplayer, nobody likes paying for that. Also the 360 was prone to hardware failures and it became a joke in the last few years of it’s life. Also the PS3 had amazing exclusives, don’t know what you’re talking about.
It wasnt. Worse looking multiplatform games with less fps, installing games despite stronger hardware and bigger discs, no achievements in the beginning, online capabilities was a joke compared to 360. PS3 felt for me like a PS2.5, not like a next-gen console.Hey now, the PS3 was great. Also I think the 360 “killed” online gaming because it was the first game console to force you to pay for online multiplayer, nobody likes paying for that. Also the 360 was prone to hardware failures and it became a joke in the last few years of it’s life. Also the PS3 had amazing exclusives, don’t know what you’re talking about.
360 was worse than ps3 imo, it had so many setbacks that kept me from buying it:It wasnt. Worse looking multiplatform games with less fps, installing games despite stronger hardware and bigger discs, no achievements in the beginning, online capabilities was a joke compared to 360. PS3 felt for me like a PS2.5, not like a next-gen console.
PS3 defended itself in the end only with exclusive games.
and for that reason now as a retro console it is a better choice to buy today.
360 was worse than ps3 imo, it had so many setbacks that kept me from buying it:
No HDMI support out the box, for the first model.
Couldn’t connect online out the box for the first model, had to buy an accessory for that.
Had to pay for online multiplayer. As opposed to free.
Smaller disc space, meaning some games had to be shipped with multiple discs, thus eating up the 360’s storage.
Was massively prone to hardware failures such as the RROD and the E74 error, because Microsoft thought it was a great idea to rush the 360 to the market before the Wii and PS3 came out. Also, Microsoft poorly handled the whole RROD situation.
The Kinect. Need I say more?
By 2009, Microsoft gave up on titles people actually wanted and started to shove Kinect down our throats.
Also, Microsoft gave the axe to the 360 Marketplace, while the PS3 Store is still up and running to this very day.
If I wanted either console back then, I most certainly would go for the PS3. It may have had a very rough start, but it pulled itself together and put up a tough fight.
I thought the 360 library was a lot more diverse than the PS3's. It was getting all of the Raiden games, the Cave shmups, the Qute shmups, etc. It was getting a lot of Japanese support back then with weird releases like Tenchu Z, the best version of Deadly Premonition, the Ninety Nine Nights games, Cavia's incredibly weird Bullet Witch, From Software's forgotten action game Ninja Blade, Mistwalker gems like Lost Odyssey and Blue Dragon, etc.Low key, I skipped that whole Gen. Was just doing other things.
Looking back and having played things from then I'd have to say PS3.
Honestly, the Wii.
...Honestly, the DS....
But to stay focused, the PS3 has/had some really great titles.
The 360 more-or-less felt like a sports-game/War-games machine nearly exclusively (LIVE Arcade, not withstanding). Does nothing for me.
Post automatically merged:
Parallel joystick brethren!![]()