Wouldn't it be great if console manufacturers would produce emulators ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 386808
  • Start date Start date
D

Deleted member 386808

Guest
It would be great if Sony or Microsoft or Nintendo would produce emulators themselves . I would pay money for that. Imagine a Playstation 5 emulator produced by Sony or the Switch 2 produced by Nintendo as an emulator . Oh yes, that will probably always remain a dream !
 
maybe not emulators but I've always though it would be beneficial for the companies if there was a way to officially purchase roms from them. It would also make their crusade to shutdown so many rom sites make a bit more sense anyway. like, if your not going to provide this service yourself how does shutting down existing ones make you any money?
 
It would be Great if they could produce those Old Games again or at least make a compatible version for newer gaming consoles to legally buy it without going broke because of greedy resellers.A Emulator on the Other hand made by those Companies rather not as i don't trust them they became to greedy they would probably make it either:
Online Only (for whatever reason probably for Copyright or some excuse they use)
Subscription Based (meaning you have to pay Monthly to play your Old Games on it)
Overcharge the price themselves like wanting 50 to 60$ for an Old Ps2 or Snes games if demand is high enough
As it stands right now unless those Companies change for the better I don't see much hope even if they release there own Emulators.
 
What I find very unfortunate is that the manufacturers do not see it as an opportunity to make the gaming world even more flexible because not everyone can afford a console or a gaming PC and it also has a lot of money potential, I am sure that many would pay for it . In this respect, all the console manufacturers are simply blind. Emulators and roms really have a great potential to make everything even more flexible and better. Too bad !
 
Microsoft has internal OG Xbox and 360 emulator specifically for their newer systems, no?
I think OP means he wanted official emulators for PC, but to answer your question: the way Microsoft handled backwards compatibility across different versions of Xbox was by using a compatibility layer, as all of them are compatible with x86 instructions. This is way cheaper than having to emulate everything like usual emulators.
 
The way Microsoft handled backwards compatibility across different versions of Xbox was by using a compatibility layer, as all of them are compatible with x86 instructions. This is way cheaper than having to emulate everything like usual emulators.
I mean, makes sense, 360 is happening through OG Xbox emulator, so it's running OG then 360. No need to write entirely new emulator for 360 games
 
I don't really want them the power of making a deceptively crappier product just to falsely get you to buy the actual system instead.

They killed Bleem! and bought out (then immediately discontinued) that Macintosh PS1 emulator because they were too good.
 
No. That sounds horrible. The first reason is that they wouldn't do it for modern - or even semi-modern - consoles, because it would cut into their sales. And if you just want it available on PC, there's an alternative: it being released on PC.

Second reason is that it would disincentivise people from making their own emulators by adding official business into it. Good old Uncle Nintendo would immediately crack down on every emulator if it was a market they were competing in. And if that emulator was shit, they could go away with it being shit because who cares? It's now an official market, and your piracy project is intruding. While they do bow to pressure, being entirely reliant on a company that has no true incentive to fix something to actually do that because it killed all the other options does not sound good.

The implications of this also means that either they're fine with people finding roms on the internet and using them, or they're going to add DRM to even more things. The first is unlikely, and the second is just the Virtual Console or (more likely, given we live in subscription hell) Switch Online/PS Plus Classics with extra steps.

Let this field stay ours; the pollution of business should be kept to a minimum.
 
it would certainly help justify the costs of game consoles nowadays, if the current systems could play older games. it would cost a fortune to bundle in all of the old hardware to ensure full compatibility; but that would certainly solve the bigger problem that exists with emulators and consoles in general.
 
Please no.
Season 5 No GIF by The Office


Emulation flourished in the wilderness of the internet. Every time corpos get involved bad things happen, investors need their egos and wallets stroked. Just, yuk.
 
it would be hell
i do not think they can make a great emulator

i can just see all the security in it and some program in the background that only allow you to play valid roms that has not been change or tamper with
so you cannot play any hacked or mod games
and it would certainly not play a fan translated game either
 
Definitely not, imo.
I feel like all it would lead to would be the publishers managing to monopolize platforms their games weren't even designed for, and I assume it would make them crack down even harder on fan-made content, since they could just charge for their own roms then.
 
Last edited:
Game companies already make emulators, called the Switch 2/Xbox... whatever they are calling it now, and the PS5 (soon to be 6). They will never sell you a legal emulator due to the fact that they want you to keep buying the same games again and again. Why let people play on their PCs when they can resell you Mario 1 again for $5-10 and only have to do a little coding? I like the idea, it would be awesome, but it'll never happen. I could very well be wrong, but as it stands, if they could make emulators 100% illegal, I bet you Nintendo at least has tried anyhow, they absolutely would.
videogame6.gif
 
Why would I want to pay money for something that's already available for free? Why do people want to give their money to corporations so badly?
It is rather odd how so many younger people nowadays are in love with their corporate overlords, isn't it? A lot of things that suits and people in power hate have people falling over themselves to try and involve people who see them as things to be squashed. And they self-censor so that they won't be denied the opportunity to have a coke advertisement 62% bigger than them and endlessly screaming so you hand over your wallet placed right next to where they stand.
 
It is rather odd how so many younger people nowadays are in love with their corporate overlords, isn't it?
It seems like brand loyalty and nostalgia play a big role, especially when companies market their products with a sense of community and belonging. It's interesting to see how that shapes their relationship with those "overlords."
And people with some real-world experience can see the bullshit they are trying to pass off as "We are your friends" when the consumer is little more than a small piggy bank to them. Cigarette companies used to pull this tactic with birthday gifts and cards, small, little made-in-Taiwan items that they got for cents and not dollars. I mean cents.
A lot of things that suits and people in power hate have people falling over themselves to try and involve people who see them as things to be squashed. And they self-censor so that they won't be denied the opportunity to have a coke advertisement 62% bigger than them and endlessly screaming so you hand over your wallet placed right next to where they stand.
It’s frustrating to see how some gaming companies prioritize profit over genuine engagement with their audience. It often feels like they cater to the loudest voices in the room, losing touch with what truly matters to the players. Self-censorship and commercialization can dilute creativity and authenticity, which is what many of us love about gaming. It’s important for us, as players, to keep speaking up and supporting companies that value their player base over just cashing in on quick trends.
annoyed010.gif
 
Legally, they can't sell you roms/isos of games they can't acquire the rights to, or realistically would not be worth acquiring the rights to. So that's 70% of the The Repo gone right there. Then they'll ask you cough up $7.99 per rom/isos, $15.99 if it's 64-bit and up.

The only way we can get what we want without spending a fortune is to break the law.
 
They've been doing that for years, that's how all those old PS1/2 games end up in their subscription services. Nintendo most obviously via Virtual Console and it's successors.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Featured Video

Digimon World: Next Order (VITA)

Latest Threads

Having trouble playing most of my retro games

Once again maybe it's cause I'm back and trying to figure out what to play for now (either...
Read more

Luna's Project64 v3.5.9

Have you ever fallen in love?

I have done a lot of thinking lately and I think I do, now. I thought I would never understand...
Read more

Most Iconic Character that is not the Protagonist

Good day, esteemed colleagues. Pray, might I inquire as to which, in your esteemed opinions, is...
Read more

Somebody have an Super Mario 64 Beta (B3313) Rom?

And to find an Super Ultra 64 BIOS Rom?
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
216
Guests online
249
Total visitors
465

Forum statistics

Threads
8,109
Messages
203,573
Members
613,410
Latest member
TheRencko

Support us

Back
Top