This forum could have taken the typical route: monetizing traffic, chasing clicks, and stacking revenue through ads. But instead, they’ve chosen to keep things clean and community-focused. Donations are accepted, of course, but they’ve avoided turning the site into a commercial operation.
Legally speaking, profiting from piracy changes the entire equation. Piracy is already unlawful, as
@qw90700 mentioned, but if no revenue is involved, liability usually centers on compensating the rights holder for lost sales. Once profit enters the picture, however, you become liable not only for the damages but also for the income you generated. Additionally, earning money from illegal activity is a criminal offense in itself.
Then there’s the issue of taxation. In many jurisdictions, income is taxable regardless of its source. If you are generating revenue through piracy and failing to report it, you invite scrutiny from tax authorities, especially if you are using standard financial channels. Unless you live in a regulatory vacuum, that poses a serious risk.
Enforcement agencies and rights holders tend to prioritize sites that profit from piracy. Donation-based models are still legally questionable, but they are less provocative. On an international scale, the situation becomes even more complex. Countries do not appreciate being used as safe havens for piracy, particularly when it undermines global trade or another nation’s economy. That is why we see cross-border enforcement efforts, such as Nintendo’s involvement in prosecuting a case in Italy.
We are no longer in an era where local laws operate in isolation. Assuming your country will turn a blind eye to piracy because the losses seem minor is misguided. If it threatens international relations or economic interests, your government may very well cooperate in enforcement, especially if doing so helps preserve diplomatic or trade stability.
So, to put it simply: running ads on this site would mean profiting from piracy.
