what's your take on gen alpha and now beta

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well compared to Gen Z I have no opinion. The failure of Gen Z which is mostly My generations and the generation before me´s fault. Just made me lose all hope in humanity.

A whole damn generation dumber than a train and the train runs on rails while they run next to it. a Generation that think their personal feelings is the most important thing in the world and generation that have almost no common sense and grew up with tiktok and other trash social media. They having kids Jesus Christ that´s end of humanity as week speak.

As I said the movie Idiocracy is becoming a reality. I bloody hope im dead before Gen Z and alpha takes over. Or I just end my self with a rope.

But who cares anyway if Putin throws a real tantrum we all be dead anyway so meh.
 
You *REALLY* don't want to play that card.

I'm frankly disgusted by the tone of the last couple of interactions on this thread and I'll ask of everyone who's active on it to refrain from continuing down this route.
So, I have been trying over and over to get back to the topic (really, I did have something to say in response to actual constructive comments here), but the troll keeps on violating the rules and filling this thread with garbage posts. I've warned him and he hasn't stopped. I doubt that's going to happen until administration comes down on him.

I apologize for my part if that has caused you or anyone else (other than the troll) discomfort. But I don't like being personally attacked (which is basically everything they have been doing in this thread) and having to sit back and let it happen. I have tried to defend myself tactfully, and have said enough on the topic. I hope that administration will do the rest of what is needed.
 
Well compared to Gen Z I have no opinion. The failure of Gen Z which is mostly My generations and the generation before me´s fault. Just made me lose all hope in humanity.

A whole damn generation dumber than a train and the train runs on rails while they run next to it. a Generation that think their personal feelings is the most important thing in the world and generation that have almost no common sense and grew up with tiktok and other trash social media. They having kids Jesus Christ that´s end of humanity as week speak.

As I said the movie Idiocracy is becoming a reality. I bloody hope im dead before Gen Z and alpha takes over. Or I just end my self with a rope.

But who cares anyway if Putin throws a real tantrum we all be dead anyway so meh.

IMG_5945.jpeg
 
miguk I don't think adressing mass group of people in such a dissmissive manner such as "gen x, y, z" is very respectful, or respectful at all.
It is dehumanising to disregard someone's individual will, let alone blame strangers at masses for the societal downfall in video game forum.

I don't what website did you came from or what your deal is but what you typed is uncalled for to say the least.
And if you expect me or anyone else write paragraphs of material compiled by an algorithm then you will have to pardon my impertinence because I am not accustomed in the use of such means.
Im gonna say this I say to every human I ever talk to respect is earned not given.

And naming different mass group of people is scientifically sound and makes is simpler to separate when doing Data colletion and so on. Hence why we also have homosapien and neanderthal becuse they are 2 very diffrent types of past humans Neanderthals are genetically distinct from modern humans while.

If calling groups of people belgoning to diffrent generations X,YZ and upset you that mush I recommend to turn of you PC and call your ISP and tell them you no longer need internet.
 
@SwordBreaker39 If calling groups of people belgoning to diffrent generations X,YZ and upset you that mush I recommend to turn of you PC and call your ISP and tell them you no longer need internet.
I was almost certain that this point of contention was at a halt.
You *REALLY* don't want to play that card.

I'm frankly disgusted by the tone of the last couple of interactions on this thread and I'll ask of everyone who's active on it to refrain from continuing down this route.
But I guess I was wrong.
In any case, imagine being personally called out as germoidx or latinx or whateverx. It's beyond just disrespectful, this how you call out lab rat experiments, not a fellow kinsmen.

Also if you are so upset, because sheer quantity of "your" writing is being rightfully acknowledged as that made by an algorithm, so much so, to the point of resorting to common threats, twords not just the userbase but moderation aswell, then perhaps measurements much more severe, from simple turning off PC, are in order.
Perhaps, seek help, perhaps, professionally.
 
Last edited:
As I said the movie Idiocracy is becoming a reality.
Okay, I need to address this, as it's an utterly maddening meme for anyone educated enough to understand how scientifically inaccurate that film is.

No, Mike Judge is not an oracle of the future. For all the good writing he's done, his career has gone up and down because he's not able to understand people widely, but just certain segments of the population. He's previously failed to successfully represent 50%+ of the population; why would he get 100% right?

Anyways, back to science. Evolution doesn't work that way. Science has been over this before several times before Judge interjected his own lack of education into the conversation. We've debunked Lamarckism, Lysenkoism, Nazism, and other poor attempts to explain evolution. In the end, Darwinian evolution has been the only one that was proven correct.

DE is simple: that which can survive, does, and reproduces because of that; that which can't survive, doesn't. The genes from those that reproduce replace the ones of the non-survivors. If we were too stupid to survive, we just wouldn't. Stupid people wouldn't be having babies if they were getting themselves killed before they can have kids. And simple statistical math and common sense says that they would never be the only ones reproducing, nor would they be reproducing with all of the intelligent people.

I should also note that the "inferior people are reproducing" argument is not even originally Judge's. It was already pushed by the eugenicists, who argued for horrible crimes against humanity because they themselves were too scientifically illiterate to get that they were wrong. And we've had other lunatics take it to a whole other level around WWII. After that, people who wrongfully believe that Thomas Malthus' overpopulation hypothesis isn't outdated (note that not only have modern sociologists proven him wrong, but they have proven the opposite) have picked it up as a rally call to stop certain people from having children. And with populations nosediving in the developed world and replacement rates only staying high in underdeveloped countries, those arguments are looking more and more suspicious.

Ultimately, our problems are not a result of whose being allowed to have babies, as practically none of us can afford that any more. The "dumbing down" of society is systematic, and the people who say "Idiocracy is a documentary" are ignoring those problems without good reason.
 
Okay, I need to address this, as it's an utterly maddening meme for anyone educated enough to understand how scientifically inaccurate that film is.

No, Mike Judge is not an oracle of the future. For all the good writing he's done, his career has gone up and down because he's not able to understand people widely, but just certain segments of the population. He's previously failed to successfully represent 50%+ of the population; why would he get 100% right?

Anyways, back to science. Evolution doesn't work that way. Science has been over this before several times before Judge interjected his own lack of education into the conversation. We've debunked Lamarckism, Lysenkoism, Nazism, and other poor attempts to explain evolution. In the end, Darwinian evolution has been the only one that was proven correct.

DE is simple: that which can survive, does, and reproduces because of that; that which can't survive, doesn't. The genes from that reproduction replace the ones of the non-survivors. If we were too stupid to survive, we just wouldn't. Stupid people wouldn't be having babies if they were getting themselves killed before they can have kids. And simple statistical math and common sense says that they would never be the only ones reproducing, nor would they be reproducing with all of the intelligent people.

I should also note that the "inferior people are reproducing" argument is not even originally Judge's. It was already pushed by the eugenicists, who argued for horrible crimes against humanity because they themselves were too scientifically illiterate to get that they were wrong. And we've had other lunatics take it to a whole other level around WWII. After that, people who wrongfully believe that Thomas Malthus' overpopulation hypothesis isn't outdated (note that not only have modern sociologists proven him wrong, but they have proven the opposite) have picked it up as a rally call to stop certain people from having children. And with populations nosediving in the developed world and replacement rates only staying high in underdeveloped countries, those arguments are looking more and more suspicious.

Ultimately, our problems are not a result of whose being allowed to have babies, as practically none of us can afford that any more. The "dumbing down" of society is systematic, and the people who say "Idiocracy is a documentary" are ignoring those problems without good reason.
Watch Religulous; it's funny, it's intelligent, it's Bill Maher, and I promise it's nothing like Idiocracy while chock-full of information you might find valuable. 😉
 
Okay, I need to address this, as it's an utterly maddening meme for anyone educated enough to understand
I will be honest with you bro, I don't think you know any such person.
Ability to watch hollywood movies does qualify as an education.
Post automatically merged:

Also it's funny how virgins talk about rising the population lol
 
Okay, I need to address this, as it's an utterly maddening meme for anyone educated enough to understand how scientifically inaccurate that film is.


Nor am I talking about how accurate or incarcerate the movie is and not saying anything like that movie will happen or not.

The point im meaning with that movie is that there will be no feature at all they share stupidity and hubris of humans today and going forward. So if do like that movie put some one to sleep for 500 years and he/she/It wakes up there will be no humans left. Either we nuked or self in to oblivion or the planet can´t lober sustain us becuse every one belives globam eco problem is a hoax. Or every one will have died to a pandemic becuse vacine is away for goverment to controll you and masks are a pain to breath with and so on.

Our feature will not be like idiocracy becuse we alrady living in a form of idiocracy where Idiotic people are in controll and companies get ayway with what ever shit they want to increase their profit margin.

So my point about the movie is the name it self idiocracy "a society or group that is controlled by or consists of people of low intelligence"
 
I say we hard reset earth


I'm going in to the earths settings


D͓̽i͓̽d͓̽ i͓̽t͓̽.͓̽ .͓̽ .͓̽ b͓̽u͓̽t͓̽ I͓̽ ḑ̴̞͛̒o̯̱̊͊͢ṇ̤͛̒̍'t̲̂̓ͩ̑ f̵͖̜̉ͅẹ̿͋̒̕ẹ̿͋̒̕l̙͖̑̾ͣ ĝ̽̓̀͑o̯̱̊͊͢o̯̱̊͊͢ḑ̴̞͛̒?
 
Watch Religulous; it's funny, it's intelligent, it's Bill Maher, and I promise it's nothing like Idiocracy while chock-full of information you might find valuable. 😉
Bill Maher is a complicated individual, to say the least. For every point he makes well, he makes 4 more than are just the dumb ranting of a narcissist. He's overly proud of himself for someone who claims to think scientifically yet lacks academic self-doubt. I get that he's a comedian, but his constant "you are all dumb and I'm clearly right" mugging isn't funny; it's bad catchphrase level humor. He can't use comedy as an excuse if it's not even technically funny.

I've seen Religulous. It was mildly interesting, but didn't provide enough evidence to support his point. His "religion bad" view is understandable, as there are plenty of obvious examples of religion gone bad, but fails to consider the numerous historical examples of religion being valuable as well as times when the "rational" were on the wrong side. (Note that John Brown was a religious man [of the original Evangelical movement back when they were not right-wing] while the slave owners were following the views of capitalist thinkers.) Likewise, he makes the same common mistake that many internet atheists do, which is to ignore all socio-political and economic issues that could effect the way religious people think and only focus on how the religion effected them, which is strangely not very rational of them.

Don't get me wrong, Maher sometimes has a good joke. He sometimes makes a good point. But he's just as irrational as some of the people he criticizes. That should be clear from the fact that he dated Ann Coulter.
 
Bill Maher is a complicated individual, to say the least. For every point he makes well, he makes 4 more than are just the dumb ranting of a narcissist. He's overly proud of himself for someone who claims to think scientifically yet lacks academic self-doubt. I get that he's a comedian, but his constant "you are all dumb and I'm clearly right" mugging isn't funny; it's bad catchphrase level humor. He can't use comedy as an excuse if it's not even technically funny.

I've seen Religulous. It was mildly interesting, but didn't provide enough evidence to support his point. His "religion bad" view is understandable, as there are plenty of obvious examples of religion gone bad, but fails to consider the numerous historical examples of religion being valuable as well as times when the "rational" were on the wrong side. (Note that John Brown was a religious man [of the original Evangelical movement back when they were not right-wing] while the slave owners were following the views of capitalist thinkers.) Likewise, he makes the same common mistake that many internet atheists do, which is to ignore all socio-political and economic issues that could effect the way religious people think and only focus on how the religion effected them, which is strangely not very rational of them.

Don't get me wrong, Maher sometimes has a good joke. He sometimes makes a good point. But he's just as irrational as some of the people he criticizes. That should be clear from the fact that he dated Ann Coulter.
Hey, valid. I'm not gonna argue against that, not because it's your personal take but rather because I don't find anything wrong about it. 😂
 
So my point about the movie is the name it self idiocracy "a society or group that is controlled by or consists of people of low intelligence"
The thing is, it's not that society is controlled by stupid people. It's controlled by ① the elderly, who are behind the times, outvoting both the mid-aged, who get it, and the young, who have been tricked into not getting it; ② corporate supremacy in all socio-political aspects of life; ③ outdated ideologies being the only dominant ones in politics, economics, and media; and ④ lack of any third spaces (physical or digital) that are not corporate controlled so that alternative views are not censored (while disruptive views are marginalized instead of coddled). We could add additional points per country for their specific cases. Big problems have big causes, not simple ones. And we should try not to be tricked into focusing on a scapegoat for those problems, as that's exactly what those causing the problems would prefer we do.
 
We all have our vices.
Boomers: Gambling and MLMs
Millennials: Cryptos and Social Media
Zoomers: Microtransactions and Dropshipping
Alpha: ChatGPT and shot attention spans
 
If both young folks and the old lads are the problem maybe society is ruled over by the ghosts.
thank you monsoon metal gear rising

Personally I am a sundowner ethusiast.
As long as you are at peace with your inner self, no wrong shell come your way.
 

Attachments

  • good ol days.jpg
    good ol days.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 0
Last edited:
We all have our vices.
Boomers: Gambling and MLMs
Millennials: Cryptos and Social Media
Zoomers: Microtransactions and Gacha
Alpha: ChatGPT and something other else soon enough
More accurately (based on more widely distributed vices):
Boomers: propaganda, machismo, and sugar (for diabetes)
Gen X: lack of protection, apathy, and opioids
Millennials: bad comedy, sludgey esthetics, and po— eherm, biology videos
Zoomers: low attention spans, unnerving conformity, and addiction to instant gratification
Alpha: brain rot
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Latest Threads

What is the power difference between a Gameboy Classic and a Color?

I feel that it was barely that different unless you check late gen (aka 2000-2001) games that...
Read more

I.Q.: Intelligent Qube

1738753788503.jpeg


Aka Kurushi in Europe (for some reasons Japan has an english name while Europe got...
Read more

Miss Hokusai 2015

The series is set in the Edo period and covers the careers of the painter Tetsuzo...
Read more

Mushishi 2005

Mushi Master Ginko travels from place to place investigating occurrences that could...
Read more

Post a song that has at least 1 word of the previous song title or artist name

So this is a silly game based on your song knowledge. I don't know how this will work out but...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
204
Total visitors
306

Forum statistics

Threads
3,381
Messages
62,234
Members
219,382
Latest member
GDKNGGZM

Support us

Back
Top