Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ikagura, post: 69254, member: 6930"] Well, I will make a big shortcut but in G.I. Joe (the first movie) they clearly show that M.A.R.S. (a PMC) is the antagonistic organisation while the G.I.'s are a group of people of various countries so it's not "American vs another country's military". The antagonist even threaten countries other than the US. I think that despite how goofy it could be they still modernised the franchise beyond the whole american hero aspect. I've read somewhere that Action Man basically replaced G.I. Joe because of the sentiment about the US military so they made the nondescript, nation-less James Bond inspired character fighting against a more generic villain that wants to conquer the world instead of being an entire army. Sadly the sequel missed many points I liked about the first. As for military stuff I think Aliens is fine since Xenomorphs aren't really sentient and that they also underestimated the danger. [/QUOTE]

Totals may include hidden visitors.

Total: 710 (members: 61, guests: 649)