- Joined
- Oct 9, 2024
- Messages
- 762
- Level up in
- 238 posts
- Solutions
- 2
- Reaction score
- 1,614
- Points
- 3,477
The thing is while the word has a definition that is not what the word has meant in video game circle. Nobody is out here calling Shovel Knight, Hollow Knight and it's sequel retro games which would be the dictionary accurate way to use the word. It is one of those what the word "theory" means in different contexts type of shits. We have for decades said retro game to mean old games, old generation of gaming, sometimes stuff harkening to it like zsnes dev's game being named "8bit retro endurance". Nintendo would not be retro not in global sense since American video game crash has that bit at the start. No other part of the world but America thanks to Atari's market in America and just about only in America defined the trends that would also end up with the crash. Nintendo came to the market with much more powerful hardware at the right time that especially later with memory mappers could do much more complex game design that was leaps ahead of what was available in the past. Atari to NES is comparable if not even harder leap in some manner than one from SNES to PlayStation 1. The only way to define NES when it came out as retro is to butcher the word to just mean "a video game". Plus globally it was not true. In Japan it created the home console market rather than revitalizing anything. Atari etc. attempts existed but had no popularity. SG-1000 from sega launched at the same day with Famicom. Europe had a very healthy market with numerous 8-bit PC's and they had healthy gaming market while a pocket existed for Sega and even Nintendo, though Nintendo's premium prices kept it slightly in least popular category. Cheaper was always better in EU market. For Brazil's home gaming market, Sega is the most important name, and is king to this day. Nintendo had no hold because they had no such deal as Sega struck with Tec-Toy. There is something to be said about the side effect of Famicom and it's hardware being important to whole Asia but that is in cloned hardware, wide spread of what we call "famiclones" and bootlegs compatible with the wide array of different famiclones.
That whole paragraph praising NES had ultimately nothing saying anything about Retro games, the definition of retro or nothing else like that. Never even heard of a concept that a an era considered retro in gaming would become so old it is somehow not retro anymore.
People like to bring up these dictionaries to these discussions when the first thing is to throw that shit out of the window since "retro game" "retro gaming" etc. do not mean the same thing, 30 years of use of the word in context of video games have already defined what it means. It means older generations of gaming that are now a niche that only some select gamers are into as the vast majority of gamers are into the current thing and current trends. In these types of forum it is easy to forget that gaming today and for a long time has been a bigger business than even movies and that means that vast majority of gamers take it as a casual thing like watching TV, having Fifa with the boys on drinking night. The niecheness of an old generation that only some gamers are into is likely best definition of something being retro. And today, that would easily mean PS3 and Xbox 360.... and now with Switch 2 and dominance of Switch etc, even Wii U.
"NES never left"? Dude, tons of people sold their NES or shelved it to buy a Mega Drive or SNES and never looked back. Tons of people sold or shelved or gifted away their SNES, NES or Mega Drive to buy a PS1. Most people did that. No idea what the "never left" thing is about what there is a mainstream market still for NES? Nintendo still selling NES systems? Nintendo themselves still publish new NES games? That is just semantics diluting meaning from the term we all here know and have our own duck test for. It is in this forum's/write up site's name. It is in what "the Repo" hosts. To start arguing with a dictionary as a bible that actually NES is not retro and it even cannot be retro is to act so smart it loops into being quite dumb. In global scale, Mega Drive and SNES did the same thing for gaming as NES did. PS1, N64 and Saturn did the same thing to gaming NES did. Arguably especially PS2 did it tenfold. PS2, GameCube and Xbox did the same thing to gaming as NES did. It kept happening again and again and only by the explosive growths each generation wooing more people into the gaming sphere can news articles state by raw numbers that gaming is the biggest entertainment market. It was not NES, not SNES and not even quite PS1 that had such a market. It was PS2, Xbox 360, PS4 which had such a market.
That whole paragraph praising NES had ultimately nothing saying anything about Retro games, the definition of retro or nothing else like that. Never even heard of a concept that a an era considered retro in gaming would become so old it is somehow not retro anymore.
People like to bring up these dictionaries to these discussions when the first thing is to throw that shit out of the window since "retro game" "retro gaming" etc. do not mean the same thing, 30 years of use of the word in context of video games have already defined what it means. It means older generations of gaming that are now a niche that only some select gamers are into as the vast majority of gamers are into the current thing and current trends. In these types of forum it is easy to forget that gaming today and for a long time has been a bigger business than even movies and that means that vast majority of gamers take it as a casual thing like watching TV, having Fifa with the boys on drinking night. The niecheness of an old generation that only some gamers are into is likely best definition of something being retro. And today, that would easily mean PS3 and Xbox 360.... and now with Switch 2 and dominance of Switch etc, even Wii U.
"NES never left"? Dude, tons of people sold their NES or shelved it to buy a Mega Drive or SNES and never looked back. Tons of people sold or shelved or gifted away their SNES, NES or Mega Drive to buy a PS1. Most people did that. No idea what the "never left" thing is about what there is a mainstream market still for NES? Nintendo still selling NES systems? Nintendo themselves still publish new NES games? That is just semantics diluting meaning from the term we all here know and have our own duck test for. It is in this forum's/write up site's name. It is in what "the Repo" hosts. To start arguing with a dictionary as a bible that actually NES is not retro and it even cannot be retro is to act so smart it loops into being quite dumb. In global scale, Mega Drive and SNES did the same thing for gaming as NES did. PS1, N64 and Saturn did the same thing to gaming NES did. Arguably especially PS2 did it tenfold. PS2, GameCube and Xbox did the same thing to gaming as NES did. It kept happening again and again and only by the explosive growths each generation wooing more people into the gaming sphere can news articles state by raw numbers that gaming is the biggest entertainment market. It was not NES, not SNES and not even quite PS1 that had such a market. It was PS2, Xbox 360, PS4 which had such a market.
Last edited: