Thoughts on Bethesda Fallout?

[dropsmegamega]

well i know 1 and 2 were obscure enough to flop and cripple interplay

There are a lot of reasons for Interplays demise, but Fallout sales aren't one of then. If something Interplay themselves had very little faith in it initially. With how bad their management was, I doubt Interplay would be around even if it had diablo tier sales tbh.

 

[rinkachi]

There are a lot of reasons for Interplays demise, but Fallout sales aren't one of then. If something Interplay themselves had very little faith in it initially. With how bad their management was, I doubt Interplay would be around even if it had diablo tier sales tbh.

yeah that's a good point

 

[RageBurner]

While I don't have enough personal contact with either Fallout style, it feels very much like a case of "Different folks, different strokes", as the games have a clear separation between styles. Classic was made to appeal to the classic WRPG crowd, Bethesda went in a different direction.

 

[Dr.Kisaragi]

I'm haven't played any of Fallout but I want to try out maybe I start like Fallout 1 or 2 like in elder scroll I did try out one which I knew this weird but I did enjoy it.

 

[χKai]

I'm haven't played any of Fallout but I want to try out maybe I start like Fallout 1 or 2 like in elder scroll I did try out one which I knew this weird but I did enjoy it.

I would suggest starting on Fallout 3 or New Vegas, as the original two games are a little bit of a slog to get through, especially for people who don't play a lot of old isometric PC games like the first two Diablo games.

 

[BigTony]

I'm haven't played any of Fallout but I want to try out maybe I start like Fallout 1 or 2 like in elder scroll I did try out one which I knew this weird but I did enjoy it.

New Vegas is generally the best place to start thats when i got into the series. But honestly i think all of them are pretty good even 4 and brother hood of steel are fun for what they are