VR is totally optional on existing PCs. But not said to be optional on steam PC which would make it more expensive than Entery level PC.
The Steam Machine has nothing to do with VR other than being a prebuilt PC capable of running VR headsets, just like other prebuilt PCs. It's entirely optional. You don't know what you are even complaining about here.
I know what im arguing about a new tech product no one asked for that will an expensive niche item for hardcore nerds with consoles and PC´s yet no time to play any of it.
You are arguing that nobody wants a prebuilt gaming PC with all the features Valve brings to the table via SteamOS, depsite there literally being a market for it out there, where people buy prebuilt PCs, take them home, and install Steam.
I seen this shit before in the past 40 years. My augment form start has been do we rely need this ??
Does anybody really need a brand new game console? No. Valve's in the best position to do it successfully and make people want one though.
We keep Companies keep saying they wanna be mindfull of the enviroment but keep releasing pointless tech that select few people with more money than they know what to do with.
It's BOM is likely saving AMD from throwing old stockpiles into landfills. Ironically negating environmentally stupid arguments like this.
Steam link failed because it was nothing we needed. Seeing how cheap enter level PC are today and even mini PC. I find if hard for valve to compete in a market where the only ones that know what steam is might get it. Saying you wanna compete in with energy level PC that has not only gamer´s but also working class and the casuals that use for anything but gaming.
Nonsense. Steam link was replaced by most common embedded devices with enough processing power to handle the streaming via an app. It's like saying the Amazon FireTV stick "failed" because you can use FireTV apps on smart tvs now.
We all know this is hardcore gaming market only and I still question most gamer´s have a PC some a PC 5 times better WHY would they need a steam PC ?
Nobody needs a game console. People who want a game console will be able to buy a Steam Machine instead of an Xbox now.
And it will not be entry level for console gamer´s moving to PC as it will most likely cost allot more than normal entry gaming PC.
It will be competitive with entry level PCs and probably slightly undercut the prebuilt OEM PC competitors, just like Steam Deck.
The steam PC will be like a Rasbbery PI pointless to 90% of people but very interesting for tech nerds and people that loves to build and thinker.
You're comparing a prebuilt x86 gaming PC from the leading PC gaming platform holder, to tiny embedded computers built as cheaply as possible for educational purposes.
So I will ask again who´s the target what´s the end goal do we rely need it.
Who is the target for game consoles? The goal is to get those customers with a compelling competitive price, so that they form an attachment to the Steam ecosystem.
The goal is not to appease poor people, though Steam does that plenty already with it's cheaper game prices.
This is brand new luxuary toy hardware. Why in the actual fuck should we all suddenly be concerned about it being marketed to poorer people, or it's impact on the environment?
Some rumors point out that the Steam Box might be $300, that would be a killer deal in my opinion. I think the most enticing product is the new gamepad; it looks freaking good.
I doubt Valve will take any loss on it, and I doubt it will be anywhere near that cheap. I'm thinking they will go 649 with a controller/puck at the cheapest, but it is all total speculation ready to be completely nuked by ram prices.