sega vs nintendo shouldn't even have been a debate

[tunezlovfull]

i know the snes vs mega drive is still a fun debate to get into nowadays, but in terms of each company's influence on the gaming industry as a whole, why does it feel like people keep disregarding just how groundbreaking sega's technology was? yu suzuki straight up invented texture mapping a good two years before doom did with quake, and they made the first game ever to use 3d models just in 1992. even disregarding that, with machines like the r360, sega basically brought amusement park rides to the arcade. so why is it that when big names such as avgn discuss sega, they can only seem to bring up its consoles in the conversation?

 

[Yankee]

Because Home Consoles are all that the normal gamer knows and cares about.
You know what they say: Genius is hardly ever appreciated during its own time.

 

[Stare best girl]

Namco is Sega's real rival

 

[DanVzare]

I stand by my belief that the SNES was the better consoles with the better exclusives. But I also stand by my belief that the Genesis/Mega Drive versions of games that were released on both, were usually the superior versions.

I'm fairly sure Sega didn't make the first game to use 3D models though.
As a matter of fact... I thought that was Atari with one of their now obscure arcade releases sometime in the late 80s. Although I doubt even that now. The "first" of anything is usually very sketchy and debatable, and I don't care enough to look it up.

Still, you're right. Sega vs Nintendo should never have been a debate to begin with. Everyone knows it was actually NEC vs Nintendo.
...
Oh wait, that was only in Japan.

In all seriousness though, I get what you mean. They both did a lot, and they both had their pros and cons. To say one is better than the other, is just wrong.

 

[Stingy Perry]

SEGA is a trailblazer!

 

[fake-kun]

I stand by my belief that the SNES was the better consoles with the better exclusives. But I also stand by my belief that the Genesis/Mega Drive versions of games that were released on both, were usually the superior versions.

I'm fairly sure Sega didn't make the first game to use 3D models though.
As a matter of fact... I thought that was Atari with one of their now obscure arcade releases sometime in the late 80s. Although I doubt even that now. The "first" of anything is usually very sketchy and debatable, and I don't care enough to look it up.

Still, you're right. Sega vs Nintendo should never have been a debate to begin with. Everyone knows it was actually NEC vs Nintendo.
...
Oh wait, that was only in Japan.

In all seriousness though, I get what you mean. They both did a lot, and they both had their pros and cons. To say one is better than the other, is just wrong.

You're talking about I, Robot. I heard it's actually pretty good.

 

[Graw]

i know the snes vs mega drive is still a fun debate to get into nowadays, but in terms of each company's influence on the gaming industry as a whole, why does it feel like people keep disregarding just how groundbreaking sega's technology was? yu suzuki straight up invented texture mapping a good two years before doom did with quake, and they made the first game ever to use 3d models just in 1992. even disregarding that, with machines like the r360, sega basically brought amusement park rides to the arcade. so why is it that when big names such as avgn discuss sega, they can only seem to bring up its consoles in the conversation?

Because Sega themselves marketed the shit out of the Genesis and not a lot else. As a kid in the 90's I didn't even know Sega made anything else other than consoles and console games. We didn't even call it the Genesis we just called it the Sega. It was basically Sega==Sonic and Nintendo==Mario and that was all anyone really gave a shit about.

 

[Konatalzumi]

i know the snes vs mega drive is still a fun debate to get into nowadays, but in terms of each company's influence on the gaming industry as a whole, why does it feel like people keep disregarding just how groundbreaking sega's technology was? yu suzuki straight up invented texture mapping a good two years before doom did with quake, and they made the first game ever to use 3d models just in 1992. even disregarding that, with machines like the r360, sega basically brought amusement park rides to the arcade. so why is it that when big names such as avgn discuss sega, they can only seem to bring up its consoles in the conversation?

Nintendo and sega aren't pro consumer anymore, gaben is pro consumer

 

[Evaccaneer Doom]

Namco is Sega's real rival

Ridge Racer vs Daytona, the REAL rivalry

Post automatically merged: Today at 2:37 PM

I stand by my belief that the SNES was the better consoles with the better exclusives. But I also stand by my belief that the Genesis/Mega Drive versions of games that were released on both, were usually the superior versions.

Well except Acro
Acro on Genesis was wow
Also Action 52, but when you replace that iconic Cheetahmen music with the music equivalent of slipping on a banana peel, you never had a chance

Post automatically merged: Today at 2:38 PM

i know the snes vs mega drive is still a fun debate to get into nowadays, but in terms of each company's influence on the gaming industry as a whole, why does it feel like people keep disregarding just how groundbreaking sega's technology was? yu suzuki straight up invented texture mapping a good two years before doom did with quake, and they made the first game ever to use 3d models just in 1992. even disregarding that, with machines like the r360, sega basically brought amusement park rides to the arcade. so why is it that when big names such as avgn discuss sega, they can only seem to bring up its consoles in the conversation?

Because AVGN's whole schtick is about video games, no real reason for him to talk about anything else, he isn't documenting a company's whole history like say Matt McMuscles.

 

[Pinballbuzzbro]

cause obnoxious basement-dwelling manchildren online in the 2000's endlessly gassed up Nintendo and everything Nintendo without considering anything else and it unfortunately had a long lasting effect on gaming discussion

Not AVGN tho Nerd is one of the good ones

 

[UnDubious]

The AVGN was literally the Angry Nintendo Nerd when he started, that's what he knows. That guy above me is right too, back in the day retro gaming forums where all about the NES and SNES, very Nintendo-centric. My theory: Sega had a cooler brand image than Nintendo in the Genesis era, so more of the Sega kids grew up to be well-adjusted and didn't end up on Internet forums. Tragically that wasn't my case.

Don't know what that other guy is on about, if you went to the arcades in the '90s you saw Sega games. They led the 3D arcade market, with Namco as their rival in that area. It's not just Daytona USA vs Ridge Racer, it's also Virtua Fighter vs Tekken and Virtua Cop vs Time Crisis.