Seeing a lot of Banned users, is that normal?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Probably an assumption based on the avatar
Well, she was originally female before Xdive resurrected and bastardized her.. 😅
I'm not a fan of MLP. But am fan of Fallout Equestria. That's MUCH cooler, man😎
You should see my MLP New Vegas mod setup. 👌
Believe it or not, nobody on RetroGameTalk is a man — we’re all beautiful, voluptuous women IRL.
If only, right? 😂
It was a quote 💀 i am really sorry if I misgendered u :c
It's okay, I still love you ❤️
 
Well, she was originally female before Xdive resurrected and bastardized her.. 😅

You should see my MLP New Vegas mod setup. 👌

If only, right? 😂

It's okay, I still love you ❤️
I had MLP mod for New Vegas. But I don't like Fallout 3+ games. I'm a fan of original Fallout 1&2 games only. But Fallout Equestria is based on Fallout 3+ games mostly, yeah😕
 
That was my trap… and you fell right into it. 😉
At least I'm glad to see you still alive and well on this forum despite barely knowing you. Also I wanna punch you.

Name's Blackjack from Fallout Equestria: Project Horizons. She is the coolest pony I've know😎
You triggered some derpibooru memories on me just now
 
2h3m2v.jpg
 
Wait a second. I’m a complete idiot. Let me try something — I just thought of this.

Hey @Spike, can you please include the following phrase in the forum rules?

Moderators are not be able to ban someone for discussing an otherwise controversial topic in good faith without due cause.

It’s important for making sure the mods don’t overstep their boundaries, and it makes discussing potentially-controversial subjects on this forum more fair for users with good intentions. Do your buddy Gorse a solid on this one, boyo.

Let’s see if that works.
 
It just goes to show, people need to talk about this kind of thing; it helps us understand not only each other better, but also each other's intentions and longterm goals for being part of a community.
True, there are bits and pieces of all of us in the midst of the discussion, both the serious parts and the utter nonsense.
 
Moderators are not be able to ban someone for discussing an otherwise controversial topic in good faith without due cause.
This looks well-worded enough to me.

It's communicates that's it's still at the mods' discretion, but not in a power hungry way.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Connect with us

Latest Threads

Almost 300 posts in 2 days.

And it's not like I set out to get a high post count. I guess y'all are just easy to talk to. 😅...
Read more

LRPS2 - new ps2 core retroarch

This went totally under the radar for me...
Read more

Why do people enjoy horror games?

Honest question. I've wondered this for a long, long time now.

While I like mysteries and...
Read more

Anyone ever saw this kind of tails?

This is the first time I've seen a cat with a tail this short or rumpy, it looks cute…but a bit...
Read more

Hidden Gems?

Online statistics

Members online
97
Guests online
154
Total visitors
251

Forum statistics

Threads
2,209
Messages
33,298
Members
124,094
Latest member
Dredg

Support us

Back
Top