Retro Handheld Reviews

Shadowruls

Paladin Knight
Writers Guild
Level 1
60%
Joined
Sep 21, 2024
Messages
70
Level up in
30 posts
Reaction score
139
Points
477
One thread dedicated to reviews of any product you like that fits the general idea, from dedicated systems, modded name brand handhelds, mobile phones, etc. I'll hopefully end up posting my own review for my experience with each system. Try to focus on the strongest and weakest aspects of the system you review

Top 10 Best Retro Handhelds Of 2021

Post automatically merged:

PlayStation Vita as a Retro Handheld ...


First system I ever hacked, my PS Vita. This was before the retro handheld market properly took off, as most of the systems couldn't even handle the more demanding SNES and GBA titles, and while this one had some issues here and there, virtually all of them have been resolved. Sadly NDS and N64 are still unfinished, I'm fairly confident they will one day be up to snuff. It is worth noting that for whatever reason, the system takes literal minutes to decompress ROMs for play, so you are best off doing that before loading them.

While the screen doesn't perfectly scale up the GBA, it does a better job than the current retro standard screen. Most games can be blown up full screen no problem, no matter the system; but with my favorite GBA series, Megaman Battle Network, movement is generally diagonal, and this creates a weird visual effect due to the uneven pixels. The system earns a few bonus points due to running PSX and PSP games natively, although the games don't get an increased resolution, which greatly hurts the PSP experience for many games.

The controls of the system remain my favorite of any handheld, particularly the D-pad. Precise movement is a must for me, so the Vita's clicky but not noisy control hits the spot each and every time. Most retro handhelds have a very mushy quality about them, which very often results in bad directional input, like false diagonals. The face buttons similarly work great. The shoulders aren't perfect, but do their job just fine. The analogue sticks are an unfortunate compromise; I understand the need for compactness, thus their small size, but I'm forced to wonder if copying the 3DS's stick wouldn't have been a better fit.

If I were on the design team for a new retro handheld, there are few changes I would make to improve the system from where it currently stands. The Vita can generally be found for around $120 USD lightly used, which I honestly think is still a great price for all of the systems you will have access to. Also note that being a first party system, the Vita features a very solid battery life, and an actually functional sleep mode. Expect at least 8+ hours of non-stop play for anything that isn't heavy-weight. If I could make exactly three changes, in order they would be: better sticks, slightly smaller size (removing those bezels alone would do the trick), and the ability to run PSP games at full Vita resolution.

Judging it only as a retro handheld, I give the system an 8/10
 
Last edited:
can ps portal run linux(emuelec) or batocera
Sorry, are you asking about the Portal that released a short while ago, the PSP from the 2000s, or the Vita from a decade ago?
In any case, I've seen nothing on any of them running anything but slightly modded firmware. And as far as I know the PS Portal is only somewhat jailbroken. Given how low its sales are, I doubt it will get much modding support
 
can ps portal run linux(emuelec) or batocera
PS Portal is a streaming device. It can't emulate anything. It's essentially a screen stuck inside of a DualSense. Stupidest idea Sony ever had. With the popularity of the Steam Deck and Switch you think Sony would capitalize and make another portable PlayStation.
 
PS Portal is a streaming device. It can't emulate anything. It's essentially a screen stuck inside of a DualSense. Stupidest idea Sony ever had. With the popularity of the Steam Deck and Switch you think Sony would capitalize and make another portable PlayStation.
And yet it can run PPSSPP at the very least

 
I finally bit the bullet and got a Retroid Pocket Mini V2. My review:
  • Small and compact, actually fits in your pocket
  • Beautiful screen, perfect shape and size for pre-widescreen games. It's an almost 4:3 display, so retro games can take up the whole screen without looking stretched, and the experience is really nice
  • Thanks to the aspect ratio and resolution options, Dreamcast games look especially beautiful
  • Runs everything up to (and including) PS2/Gamecube fine, with minor hiccups or compatibility issues which (in my experience so far) are easily solved
  • PS2/Gamecube may not run well with bumped-up resolutions, but it depends on the game and emulator
  • The D-sticks are a bit too low to be comfortable; playing a D-stick game for long periods can be awkward or painful, to say nothing of games that use both sticks. The sticks themselves are good quality, though
  • Buttons and bumpers are satisfying; the D-pad is clicky like the Vita, which I like. I've seen some people dislike the "clacky" face buttons (they're similar to SNES buttons but convex), but I like them. It has rigid bumpers and "soft" triggers similar to the PS2
  • The system as a whole feels more luxe, sturdy, and high-quality than, for example, the Retroid Pocket 4
  • Battery life is good, and the system doesn't heat up beyond what is comfortable
The ~$300 price tag seemed reasonable to me for something I knew I was gonna play for years to come. The only systems I wouldn't feel comfortable running on it are DS/3DS (because of the dual screens) and PSP/Vita (because of the wider aspect ratio). OG XBox of course is a no-go, since there is no working Android emulator. Other than that I've managed to run everything, though Retroarch can be a bit fussy with some systems, like the PC-Engine CD or the SEGA CD.

The only extra costs I had to incur were for the Pro version of the Mupen N64 emulator (comes without ads), the Pro version of YabaSanshiro (lets you import/scan ROMs), and a nice-looking frontend called ES-DE. But those are all optional (and cheap). Setup took me a couple hours, and that includes importing ROMs.

Overall I strongly recommend it for retro gaming, with the caveat that 3D games can get uncomfortable. 8.5/10
 
Last edited:
PS Portal is a streaming device. It can't emulate anything. It's essentially a screen stuck inside of a DualSense. Stupidest idea Sony ever had. With the popularity of the Steam Deck and Switch you think Sony would capitalize and make another portable PlayStation.
Yeah, right? I remember seeing this thing at launch and thinking "oh, it'll be like a high end tablet or handheld pc that can play games and has a ps5 remote play app". Nope. It only did remote play. That was it. If you didn't have a connection it was a literal paperweight.

Which then made me wonder, especially with that price tag, who it was even for. Pretty much nobody, that's who.
 
I disagree. It's an odd device, but I understand why they released it the way they did.

Basically, Sony execs were facing the following:
  1. The Switch/Steam Deck/other handheld devices were showing that there was a market for the handheld form factor again
  2. They don't want to miss out on a cut of that market
  3. However, the problems the Vita faced means they don't want to maintain a second gaming infrastructure, again
  4. So, it'll need to be able to play PS5 games. However, the PS5 is huge and power-hungry, there's no way they can miniaturize that down enough
  5. They can't make it less powerful, the whole point of a console is they guarantee a standardized spec for developers to target
  6. Alright then, it's going to have to be a streaming device then, their remote play has worked well in the past
The price is the awkward part. It's actually a lot cheaper than I was expecting (hell, they sell controllers without a screen for the same amount), but it's also a bit much for a streaming-only device, I'll admit. Still, if I find one 50% off some day, I'd probably pick one up.

Personally, if I was in charge at Sony, I might have tried to make it a PS4 Portable, and just say it can't play PS5 games. I'm not sure how well that would've gone over with consumers, but it would've been an interesting device.
 
Yeah, right? I remember seeing this thing at launch and thinking "oh, it'll be like a high end tablet or handheld pc that can play games and has a ps5 remote play app". Nope. It only did remote play. That was it. If you didn't have a connection it was a literal paperweight.

Which then made me wonder, especially with that price tag, who it was even for. Pretty much nobody, that's who.
My wife bought one and we returned it after 3 days. Even with a 1gbp/s connection and putting the PS5 and Portal right next to the router we still had cut-outs and buffering issues. She took it to work and it would stop playing every five minutes with the PS5 connected to ethernet. It's just a terrible device and I think people who use this just compensate with copium.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Support this Site

RGT relies on you to stay afloat. Help covering the site costs and get some pretty Level 7 perks too.

Featured Video

Latest Threads

Navy CIS Series

1200px-NCIS_Logo_2013.png

I have found my passion for Navy CIS, I watched all seasons of Navy CIS New Orleans...
Read more

Which PC-Engine is right for me?

Hello! I’m Tama! I usually prefer to play on original hardware when possible and like to have a...
Read more

i forgot how much i love toby's music

so im replaying deltarune cuz i lost my save file (rip) and i gotta say
god damn i did NOT focus...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
144
Guests online
3,046
Total visitors
3,190

Forum statistics

Threads
13,080
Messages
318,209
Members
873,515
Latest member
Keldysensei

Advertisers

Back
Top