INDIES: GAMING IS DYING BECAUSE OF YOU... BUT ALSO THRIVES BECAUSE OF YOU

1746813352550.jpeg

The awful truth is that Big companies are not exactly as respectable as they used to be. Xbox came into fire for closing studios and almost killing Hi-Fi Rush’s chance of being a franchise, Sony’s hunger with the PS5, and Nintendo…

…YES.

With an inspiration of this report being Nintendo’s infamous Switch 2 game pricing, I decided to make this report as a Glimmer of Hope and brighter counterpart to a report about how we are in part responsible for gaming’s actual state. Gentlemen, Gaming still has a final line of hope and defense in this “Hyper-realistic 100 GB games that may as well cost 1000 Dollars” sea:

Indie gaming

“Why does a game that looks like it could run in a NES will save an entire industry?” you may be thinking, and realistically it won’t exactly SAVE it fully, just keep it from falling in another Crash of '83. But now that we have a realistic approach on the scope of the article, let’s begin:

THE HUMBLE ORIGINS
1746812772226.png

“LOOK MOMMY, NO DEVKIT”

Raise your hand if you believe Indies started with Cave Story.

Sees lots of hands raised

You are right… and wrong. Actually, Indies came into existence far from a little computer nobody knows about called Commodore 64 (sarcasm mode off). Yup, most people may conflate Indie with Homebrew, but according to Google, Indie is for user-programmable consoles like, say, a computer, while a Homebrew is a program created by hobbyists. That set aside, Commodore 64 was, at the time, what Windows 7 still is at the time of writing, and games could be made by people with programming skills (alas, some of them usually were mere text adventures).

Eventually, as computers evolved, so did Homebrew schemes, eventually leading to ZUN creating a phenomenon that nowadays still holds: Touhou, AKA the most notorious Indie franchise. Eventually, just like how ZUN created a subgenre, Daisuke Amaya, with zero knowledge of programming, lack of imagination, and pocket lint budgets, created a game that, while not a great phenomenon as Touhou, was going to be the kickstone for the genre and a turning point in gaming history in general. Now… enter Cave Story.

A SINGLE MAN IN THE RIGHT PLACE CAN CREATE A GREAT CHANGE IN AN INDUSTRY
1746812797529.png

“What a crude game, I doubt someone will play it, let alone remember it long after its release, right?”

Cave Story came from the mind of the aforementioned Daisuke Amaya, made (from his own words) with scraps. The game was literally revolutionary. The idea of a single man making a AAA-tier game with scraps in a cave was a selling point—but what people got was a great game: unique, bittersweet story, solid gameplay, challenging but enjoyable mechanics, and a great chiptune OST. That was the reason why the game got lots of praise, giving people too the idea that “Hey, if a man can create art with crayons, I want to too.”

It was relatively slow; the only engine where people could create their own adventures was RPG-Maker. Said engine wasn’t half bad: OFF, Yume Nikki, LISA, Lonely Wolf Treat, Ib—all of them made from passion and a creative mind. Experiences created by people that love games and have played them. Some time later…

INTEGRATION AND COMPETENCE WITH BIG NAMES
1746812834143.png

Look at you, small man—you are now acknowledged by the big men.

Eventually, Indie games got so normalized and accepted that they got onto big names’ radar, to the point Shovel Knight and Shantae have appeared in FUCKING SMASH ULTIMATE AS STICKERS… Smash rejection memes aside, that acknowledgment is more than enough.

Now, the meat of my report:

How Indies are saving the world… or the hobby.

NO BIG CHEESES EQUALS FULL CONTROL

Let’s think about it:

¿How many games that could be great were mangled due to executives saying “NO” to mechanics or plots that could be great?

Great, now, ¿how many suits have ruined small Indie games?

My point.

FINE, I’LL DO IT MYSELF

A picture counts more than a thousand words, so I will let democracy talk:
1746812854276.png
1746812863016.png

LEFT: PAPER MARIO STICKER STAR

RIGHT: BUG FABLES: THE EVERLASTING SAP


As much as we wanted, the truth is that video games are a business, and if a game fails in sales but gets good reviews, it still failed monetarily.

Therefore, companies won’t have interest in making a sequel unless they want to gamble. Or even if they wanted, rights and copyright may put a dent in the plans and the owners, to quote a Smiling Friends episode: “wants these IPs to sit in them and not use them.”

Fortunately, small studios that most likely played the original will surely do them. Just add some details to characters, add new mechanics, swap some stuff of the original… and DOJAAAAAAAAAAN! New Castlevania game.

1746812883413.png

EVEN WHEN NOT ALL OF THEM ARE SUCCESSORS, THEY STILL AT LEAST BOTHER TO MAKE JUMPS OF FAITH

HORSE BEATING WARNING

How many AAA games feel more and more samey?

How many Indies are as creative and experimental as the 8 and 16-bit era?

All I want to say is that in a—at the end of the day—business where man eats man, it is true that staying true to what works is safe. But sometimes, risks need to be taken, and so far, most Indies I have played decided to take the jump, with a lot of great results:

Tunic: A Zelda clone of the bunch… however, the creator remembered the trips back home from the video store reading the manuals, and rather than a mere adventure game, we have a game that incites learning new rules and even a new language.

A Little Squire decided to go for the big league betting on a great mix-and-match of graphical styles, from kid book illustration to claymation.

Even A Hat in Time decided to flesh the right in the Collect-A-Thon genre by giving us a game that gave lots of exploration without going overboard like DK64.

Why bother with the big jump if you yourself said the game industry is filled with sharks?

It may have to do with our next point:

MORE FOR LESS

1746812926779.png

1746812937445.png

Above: Mega Man, a game that if you played a Mega Man, you know you can drink them.

Below: Momodora, a far more complete game.


Breaking the gaming theme:

Godzilla Minus One, one of the finest Godzilla movies, managed to recover its budget in record time—not because it beat the current Box Office record, but because it managed to sell a great movie with a low budget.

Indies don’t have much of a choice—heck, Cuphead, winner of lots of Game Art prizes, wasn’t an easy affair. They famously had to mortgage their homes TWICE to finish the game.

¿End result?

The best shooter on Epic, a neat homage to rubber hose cartoons, and a satisfactory challenge overall.

Not only do the limited budgets benefit the net earnings, but also our pockets.

Compare a big-name game’s $60–80 price over an Indie’s $15. Now compare the size of their scope, how much content, how many mechanics, how much game per game.

STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE?

POP QUIZ! Which game do these characters come from?
1746812978426.png
1746813014437.png


Now with these:

1746813035719.png
1746813042743.png


Granted, Japanese games have averted this crisis, but when it comes to Western ones, the homogeneity of both character and world designs is notorious.

Try to picture a simulator, a shooter, or a WRPG that doesn’t look like its screenshot would be confused for another if it weren’t for the recognizable name.

Now picture an Indie. Even without relying on a retro aesthetic, you will note that, at the end of the day, Indies have become more memorable than the hyperrealistic style nowadays.

Even leaving graphics aside, the Indies—being made by, as reiterated, people that played and loved the games—give us what we want:

An experience created by someone that understands video games.



RESPECTFUL OF OUR RESOURCES

Economization of budgets isn’t the only thing Indies do.

Ace Combat, an arcade plane game, has fast missions and even with the DLC you won’t spend too much there if you know what to do.

¿The size?

SIXTY FRIGGIN MEGAS!!!

For comparison, A Hat in Time gives us an entire playground of stuff to mess around and find out. With all the expansions, you will get a humble 15 GB usage… still big, but nothing compared to the aforementioned 60.

Not only is space something Indies think about—Resident Evil 2 Remake has pretty graphics, but if your PC doesn’t have a graphic or processing card that can handle them… (Insert burning PC)

The heaviest graphically intense games I’ve played by contrast run on laptops, if the reviews are to be believed.

Considering the games are made by people without all the thingamajigs the big names have, I think it’s obvious why it happens.

Yet it has the side benefit of making the games be lighter than feathers when it comes to resources.

A CONCLUSION TO HELP YOU SLEEP AT NIGHT

Granted, I am not saying ALL Indies are the greatest games ever.

In fact, some Indie projects or makers have been contaminated by AAA practices due to how attractive the word “INDIE” makes a game sound—causing a lot of games that fail to live up to the hype or projects that end as smoke, scams, or merely the developer didn’t manage to make sense of all the things involved in game making.

Let alone whatever pipe dream they wanted to make, like Bob’s Game (the lightest example I can bring).

Yet despite that, Independent has managed to keep this little hobby afloat. Then again, AAA companies have made it right, so they deserve their praise too—like Atlus with the fix that is SMT V: Vengeance.

Their work may be small, but without Indie developers, gaming would have a crash akin to the one that happened 42 years ago.

If you want to help them, you can too:

1) Pay for the games. As said a lot, they are far cheaper, and being a small group of people, all of them will appreciate the thanks.

2) Keep your eyes peeled for scammers or games that fly too near the sun.

3) Big names can do it good too. Help them by paying—as long as they don’t go overboard.

With all said, I want to thank most of the Indie games that helped me form my character and tastes in gaming:

The knight in their desolate quest in a death Hallownest,

The hilarious Peppino and his fast-paced antics for his pizzeria’s sake,

Quote and his seemingly impossible journey to look for the Demon Crown,

To the Batter, who went on a journey to puri… nevermind, he committed the G-word,

To the Penitent One, whose penance in the rotten Cvstodia was as satisfactory for him as much as to me,

To the Cup brothers, Cuphead and Mugman, who taught me that you can dodge debts by shooting your debt keeper (for legal reasons, JK),

To Madotsuki, who taught me that sometimes, you don’t need a goal—you can just keep walking without care of an objective,

And to the one that started my journey in the genre…



To Frisk, whose accidental fall into a world full of quirky people taught me a lot of determination to keep going even when stuff got hard and bleak.



Thank you to all of you folks—your journeys will be told.

1746813126313.png


With all said…

Bakuma out.
 

Attachments

  • 1746812913656.png
    1746812913656.png
    137.7 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
POP QUIZ! Which game do these characters come from?
1746815282269.png
1746815252570.png


Now with these:

1746815292112.png
1746815297388.png


Bakuma out.
OUCH.

That's a good way to measure the videogame industry through the years. The less they payed attention to mascots and iconic characters, the less interesting it became.

Thank you for highlighting that any hobbyist project can be considered an indie game, not just indie superstars.

Indie devs should team up more. I know there's many obstacles to this, but when people click, the sky's the limit.
 
Well gaming industry have them self to blame when they rather focus on modern gaming audience which makes up 0.1 % of the total consumer market. When you think I shall hire SBI consultant that tell me what to make and I double if not even triple down on the shit even if it lost me 2-3billion.

Then it does not help when you got companies like EA and Ubisoft that keep being around somehow even when people say they hate them ??? Which means they are not as disliked as people make out to be.

A CEO for a small company said something allot of gamer´s today agree on.
"Reminder: We make games, not politics. We stand for non-political and non-social agendas"

"‘Modern audience’ is a false myth. Data prove it now. Making games for them is a path to extinction."

"Making games based on what players actually want, rather than pushing unrelated agendas, will only boost the industry and create more jobs."

The AAA industry is in shambles because for the past decade they done some questionable shit that cost them allot of trust. But it became even worse sense 2019 where they done so much dumb decisions that cost them so much of trust to the point that if the new Mass effect game fails Bioware will join the rest in the mass grave of good companies. And Ubsioft next failrue will result in 100% tecent ownership.


The Indie devs, the Asian devs have been saving the indstury for the past 10 years making games people WANT and they will keep doing it. But the think that will make the game indstury 100 time bigger and better is the death of EA, Ubisoft, Blizzard, Nintendo.

Same could be said for any part of the indstury we as consumers would be better of if Disney, Google, Apple and all of does big companies that hold majority of the monoply goes away. They can charge what ever they want becuse thanks to them we have less options.

competition is what lowers the prices and pushes companies to come up with new ideas. Look back in the days game companies took more risk and came up with all kinds of crazy ideas but todays they rather push of the same shit over and over with a new coat of paint becuse it´s a safe way to make money. Reason why they push so many remakes and remasters it´s easy money with little to no risk.
 
I’d actually slightly disagree with the example, Nick is pretty cool character and one of the best from cod. Plus the whole “haha cod bad” punching bag is tiresome and disregards the good qualities in it in a discourse strictly by outsiders.
That's a good way to measure the videogame industry through the years. The less they payed attention to mascots and iconic characters, the less interesting it became.

Thank you for highlighting that any hobbyist project can be considered an indie game, not just indie superstars.

Indie devs should team up more. I know there's many obstacles to this, but when people click, the sky's the limit.
ONE HUNDRED percent agree here. ALL indie devs are valid!!
 
Sooner or Later AA Video Games will be the new standard of the video game industry because at least they are trying to continue with the old tradition of releasing complete, finished titles with little or no technical problems. Unlike AAA Games that was once the boom of high-quality titles in the 90s and 2000s and some of them 2010s that came complete, finished and with hardly any technical problems. But since the AAA video game developer business was changed in secret, there was a decline that to this day does not stop and many recognized studios that were once loved ended up losing respect and reputation after bad decisions (Although Atari and SEGA both in the past and the present What were they the first in this case) and Then the rest who went to that same dark side in releasing unfinished and incomplete games and with various technical issues that damage the gaming experience, patches or urgent updates on day 1, DLC's at gold prices and for profit (but not 100%), Microtransactions, Loot Boxes, Season Passes, Etc. and that is also the same executives who force them to rush the release of the games on a specific date and to top it all off, the developers charge them a pittance to make a game from Monday to Monday and on top of that they do not even let them rest And on top of that, being day, noon and night on the PC developing the game, at least you know the Time Crunch and also that the investment of creating a video game became more expensive over time that this also affects the final result of a video game. And in the not-so-distant future, if famous video game companies continue to make bad decisions in creating a game and it ends up going wrong, sooner or later the AAA video game industry will stop being profitable in favor of AA, which will be like a replacement in the future.
 
I’d actually slightly disagree with the example, Nick is pretty cool character and one of the best from cod. Plus the whole “haha cod bad” punching bag is tiresome and disregards the good qualities in it in a discourse strictly by outsiders.
Well, I'm gonna... agree with you.

I agree with example I quoted in a more generalist kind of way. Also a form of measuring something isn't always completely accurate.

The indie AAA slop stereotype may be true to a certain extent, but I know some of these games still have talent behind them. They're usually not the kind of game I'm into, but I have a friend who likes the Assassin's Creed franchise from example, and he's super enthusiastic to tell about parts of the story across games that were well crafted. It's the kind of thing you only can see if you're not taking it at bad faith from the get go.

That's why I love hearing people telling about games they got deeply involved with, whenever it's love, hate or a mixed bag, because this way I get to have a glimpse of a new experience that I otherwise maybe wouldn't seek for myself.
 
I’d actually slightly disagree with the example, Nick is pretty cool character and one of the best from cod. Plus the whole “haha cod bad” punching bag is tiresome and disregards the good qualities in it in a discourse strictly by outsiders.
The irony is that i wanted to use another non-COD franchise for that one, but i couldn't figure out which one would fit (Planned to add Michael De Santa, but i believe he is recognizable)

i apologize
 
Well, I'm gonna... agree with you.

I agree with example I quoted in a more generalist kind of way. Also a form of measuring something isn't always completely accurate.

The indie AAA slop stereotype may be true to a certain extent, but I know some of these games still have talent behind them. They're usually not the kind of game I'm into, but I have a friend who likes the Assassin's Creed franchise from example, and he's super enthusiastic to tell about parts of the story across games that were well crafted. It's the kind of thing you only can see if you're not taking it at bad faith from the get go.

That's why I love hearing people telling about games they got deeply involved with, whenever it's love, hate or a mixed bag, because this way I get to have a glimpse of a new experience that I otherwise maybe wouldn't seek for myself.
Ahhh, I apologize, I should’ve phrased it more clearly that I was responding to the images, but they disappeared when I replied. So it made the first half of my reply seem targeted at you. Don’t worry about it.
 
Ahhh, I apologize, I should’ve phrased it more clearly that I was responding to the images, but they disappeared when I replied. So it made the first half of my reply seem targeted at you. Don’t worry about it.
Don't worry about it too, I was glad to elaborate my view either way. ::terriermon-happy
 
Nice perspective.

I have another opinion tho, that the "industry" - aside from being a generalistic term that people often doesn't know what it means in more superficial discussion - is not dying or crashing. It's just changing for the next big way to trend.

Remember when facebook or X was begin to die but their owners continues to be the richest guys in the world? Yeah...

I don't like the online discourse to blame players as straw man too. Some people aren't hobbist in our niche and that's fine, they will continue to play Call of Duty, Zelda or The Last of Us Remaster Remake. Like @ciro64 said, there's people who are deeply passionate to things that we think as a lesser material. If big companies fail, shame on capitalism only. Lol

And just to conclude, this is a very western vision of gaming right now. We simply don't pay attention on eastern market, like China. There is a guy on social media called Felipe Pepe that always talk about gaming industry outside of the american-european axis and it's super interesting.

Btw, I like articles like that provokes me to think about my hobby. Even with a different point of view, it's nice to discuss things that actually matter online lol.
 
Indies can do certain concepts really well, but there are some game genres that are relatively inaccessible to the smaller ones. While it is true that a lot of AAA companies are adopting bad practices, there are some 2.5A companies that still care about their customers. Indie developers are a good part of the ecosystem, but they aren't a true replacement for a game with a significant budget for the same reason indie movies aren't a replacement for Hollywood blockbusters.
 
"Just sharing my thoughts" I thought that they're raising the price of the Switch 2 because of Trump's Tariffs? I think you using Paper Mario Sticker Star as an example is wrong because one it gotten a sequel and like most of the first party 3DS games they're just tech demos. Hot take I don't think Shantae deserves to be a Smash Bros fighter, Shovel Knight has a better shot. Can you really compare A Hat in Time with Donkey Kong 64? (As a guy you never played A Hat in Time)😅
 
The irony is that i wanted to use another non-COD franchise for that one, but i couldn't figure out which one would fit (Planned to add Michael De Santa, but i believe he is recognizable)

i apologize
Hahaha no need to apologize at all, I was just being a goose haha! I loved your piece, even tweeted it out on the main rgt bsky! 😃
 

Users who are viewing this thread

latest_articles

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
263
Total visitors
403

Forum statistics

Threads
7,702
Messages
192,293
Members
566,319
Latest member
aminaja

Support us

Back
Top