- Joined
- Apr 4, 2026
- Messages
- 1,863
- Level up in
- 637 posts
- Solutions
- 3
- Reaction score
- 4,928
- Points
- 3,577
- Location
- Hell, Norway 🇳🇴
It doesn't really surprise me because it's painfully obvious that the marketing strategy behind the N64 was to make it the "family-friendly alternative" to the Saturn's edginess and whatever the PS1 was doing in-between rounds of dominating genres that were formerly Nintendo's to rule (mostly RPGs). But it's still a bit jarring, you know?
I bet that many of the people who decided to get an N64 had been playing Zapper and Super Scope games in the past and were, if not eager, then at least expecting to continue doing so now that the stage was bigger and the games were finally more arcade-like, not just flat screens to point at — it was fair to expect it, especially considering that both Sony's and SEGA's offerings did include such peripherals.
This is never brought up whenever I talk to those who were fortunate enough to grow up with the system (their gripes are elsewhere), but I found it very interesting regardless... I mean, why not try falling back to a brand-defining classic now that a couple of trusted developers had jumped ship and holes were appearing everywhere? It would have made sense and wouldn't have alienated their target audience all that much because the console was still overwhelmingly about said audience.
It's just strange, man.
Thoughts?
I bet that many of the people who decided to get an N64 had been playing Zapper and Super Scope games in the past and were, if not eager, then at least expecting to continue doing so now that the stage was bigger and the games were finally more arcade-like, not just flat screens to point at — it was fair to expect it, especially considering that both Sony's and SEGA's offerings did include such peripherals.
This is never brought up whenever I talk to those who were fortunate enough to grow up with the system (their gripes are elsewhere), but I found it very interesting regardless... I mean, why not try falling back to a brand-defining classic now that a couple of trusted developers had jumped ship and holes were appearing everywhere? It would have made sense and wouldn't have alienated their target audience all that much because the console was still overwhelmingly about said audience.
It's just strange, man.
Thoughts?



