No harshities here, homie, just something more personal: conversation like this' a weighted game I prefer not to indulge in. Credence to similarity calls via comparison between the two were often a foot-in-door tactic for undermining forum structures to begin with. Varying incentives - sometimes for havoc; other times moderation effort for pooling more users - but the question alone's something I don't willy-nilly into with bleeding heart. Even for cause of sentimentality: it's just a different flavor of saccharine that I'd prefer in more defensible a position rather than bared out for manipulation.
Again, no mark against you. I understand what's being asked. Just what came to me when asked this question on a place that I'm comfortable enough in. Don't net yourself a 'gotcha' either by calling me out for the hypocrisy on display of baring my heart out! I'll turn you into Idiot Meat and leave you for the Grotesques~!
Truth enough? It's nice to be back on forums again. There's annoying call-backs to the monocultural technostate here and there - and those'll pave Hell before they go away - but better them call-backs than being the one dunked into that miasma. I'd take the userbase-communal imperfections of forums as a whole nowadays than going on Twitter/Discord again and seeing the worst part of an IRC chat group repeated ad nauseum forevermore.
Forums, image boards, social media and messaging clients like discord can all be used responsibly and they largely depend on their communities [...] nothing is truly safe from unhealthy behavior or unhealthy habits.
Word of truth; none can contest. But inclines can - and do - exist. E.N.E.M.Y Mindz (Every Negative Environment Manipulates Your Mindz), y'know?
Onus of responsibility's a tricky call to pin down. Often times, it can be manipulated into a grand-scale conversation of culpability. I.E: plausible deniability; the person themselves are at fault instead of holding themselves to better standard in whichever way, which is its
own can of worms (by design). At some point, the conversation's better to be had about stopping before one starts rather than going to bat for a whole host of nuance that's there just for sake of argument.
Coincidentally, that's where healthy engagement lies for stuff like you mentioned. Knowing where to cut off is bar none one of the best habits you could cultivate during your time, besides simply not using them to begin with...
Peace to the rest of your statement, though preach to your last:
This is being said not to regurgitate the truth, but to highlight the critical issue that true alternatives don’t always exist, and it is possible to mis-use any platform be that as it may by.
I'd be the one saying something to this effect if you hadn't, especially after all that momentum above. Here's to you, homie. ?