Record of Lodoss-war says otherwise .all anime and manga have shit world building compared to gundam and kill the past View attachment 127417

Then you get Legend of the Heroes of the Galaxy which is based on books so that's why it's even deeper.all anime and manga have shit world building compared to gundam and kill the past View attachment 127417
I always felt like Naruto existed to sell toys. The first few season's combat scenes were stuffed to the brim with burrowed cells from other movies and productions of the era. The main character's motivation wasn't rooted in anything other than vanity, self aggrandizement. And, it was like he existed in an existential vortex where common questions anyone would ask like, "who were my parents?" never crossed his mind. Of course I only ever watched the first three seasons. So, maybe all of this was resolved later on. But, definitely dismissed as a subpar rip off of Dragon Ball Z like I did all other shonens back then.Hot take: Naruto has mid-tier worldbuilding compared to Bleach and One Piece, and it’s not really close.
1. Naruto’s world is small and samey.
Every major region feels like a slight variation of the same ninja-feudal template. The 5 Great Nations share similar culture, architecture, and tech levels. Compare that to One Piece, where every island is basically its own ecosystem with unique politics, biology, and history, or Bleach, where each realm (Soul Society, Hueco Mundo, Human World) is dramatically different. Naruto’s world is cohesive, sure, but not especially diverse.
2. The chakra system starts tight and ends loose.
Early on it feels structured, but as the series goes on, chakra rules and power scaling get inconsistent. Bloodlines contradict earlier explanations, and Six Paths powers rewrite half the system. Meanwhile One Piece’s Devil Fruits + Haki stay consistent with clear limitations, and Bleach’s reiatsu/zanpakuto system has a thematic logic that stays intact.
3. Late-story lore dumps hurt the worldbuilding.
The Otsutsuki, Kaguya, the God Tree, Ten-Tails origin, cosmic chakra—these show up very late and retcon the entire history of the world. They don’t grow naturally from prior hints; they feel stapled on to escalate the stakes. By contrast, One Piece seeds Void Century, Ancient Weapons, and WG corruption from way back. Even Bleach’s late reveals (Soul King, Noble Houses, Quincy history) fit within what the story had already established.
4. The politics are surface-level.
Naruto presents a world built on international rivalry and conflict but explores almost none of the political depth behind it. The alliance before the Fourth War basically handwaves centuries of tension. One Piece has an entire geopolitical machine—Marines, World Government, Yonko, Shichibukai, Revolutionaries—that interacts in meaningful ways. Even Soul Society’s internal politics have more texture.
5. The mythology is cool but underdeveloped.
Tailed Beasts, summoning realms, ancient shinobi myths—all awesome ideas, almost none of them deeply explored. The toad/snake/slug worlds? Barely scratched. Bijuu lore? Mostly vibes. Otsutsuki? Space ninjas with no real culture. Meanwhile, Bleach fully commits to its spiritual cosmology, and One Piece builds a layered mythos that ties into history, races, and world politics.
TL;DR:
Naruto has solid worldbuilding for what it aims to be, but compared to the sheer scale and depth of One Piece or the cosmological structure of Bleach, it lands squarely in the middle, cohesive, but not expansive or consistent enough to compete.
Well i never alluded to it not being crucial to storytelling, my rebuttal is simply HOW crucial it is, depends on the writer and also the one reading said story.worldbuilding is crucial to storytelling and not only determines where a story takes place (either a fictional set or not), but also its cultural context and historical length.
I just don't subscribe to this notion, not only do i find the statement oddly pretentious, it undermines a writers time and effort entirely. If were going to say that then that means other series with similar tropes were also made for merchandising. Dragonball was made just for the sake of merch, One piece was made for the sake of merch, Jojos, Dandadan, CSM, hell, nearly every shonen was made for merch.that's way too explicit that naruto was made just for the sake of merchandising... and that's all fine
I always assumed that this was mostly for the joke or that the world of Naruto has a ninja theme yet is still a fairly "modern" world.Worldbuilding is crucial to storytelling and not only determines where a story takes place (either a fictional set or not), but also its cultural context and historical length... even as a fan, I think we should just all acknowledge that the wb in naruto is as messy as its story, that's why we see absurd stuff like choji eating chips by the same space/time daimyo lords are arriving to konoha to follow the events of chunin exams lol.
I'm not a naruto fan (just nostalgic of the 90's mangas in general) but it feels refreshing when a series doesn't try to be the next Dune or LotR in term of lore.I will break a spear and will see that as a positive.
I follow you in that aspect. Sometimes it could be detrimental for the narration.Yeah, worldbuilding is good, but too many cooks spoil the soup, i want to watch some Anime, not have to do geography and history homework over a fictional world.
Unfortunately, yes. people still waste their time debating how this...Did I hit my head and wake up in 2006? People are still arguing about the big three of yesteryear?

I kinda like the lore of Cowboy Bebop yet I think that the worldbuilding isn't that important. It's just that Earth is messed up because of an accident long ago yet I always feel like it's just one plot point not the entire subject of the series.Honestly, all three's world building falls flat or loses interest the further you get into these overly long series. Tenchi OVA, Tenchi Universe, Cowboy Bebop, Digimon Adventure or Tamers, Outlaw Star, Big O and even El Hazard have more interesting world building. Most of those are much shorter anime.
Yet it's still more interesting and intriguing than the big 3.I kinda like the lore of Cowboy Bebop yet I think that the worldbuilding isn't that important. It's just that Earth is messed up because of an accident long ago yet I always feel like it's just one plot point not the entire subject of the series.
Agreed, It's why I mentioned those shows earlier. They have the adventure itself that make it work for them.I said it before but people overestimate lore and world building for series when sometimes it should just be about the adventure in itself.