Favorite Books

Dark Tower was great, up until King was hit by the van and he rushed through V-VII. He turned into a different writer altogether back then. He lost his edge.

I feel like that is one of the reasons why George Martin hasn't finished a Song of Ice and Fire. He's rich and famous now and doesn't have that hunger in him anymore. He knows he can't finish the series in a way that will satisfy the fans and is content to just let it sit.
 
I feel like that is one of the reasons why George Martin hasn't finished a Song of Ice and Fire. He's rich and famous now and doesn't have that hunger in him anymore. He knows he can't finish the series in a way that will satisfy the fans and is content to just let it sit.

Saying GRRM doesn't have a hunger is too rich. The man ran out of ideas, was stuck with writers block in a continuity time skip he never really intended to sort out, and his writing is now heavily focused on food descriptions.

If he isn't meandering around a fictional food banquet, he is over on his live journal describing his experience watching football and eating hot dogs.

The guy writes easy to read stuff, but he will never finish it. Same as Patrick Rothfuss and his unfinished crap.
 
Saying GRRM doesn't have a hunger is too rich. The man ran out of ideas, was stuck with writers block in a continuity time skip he never really intended to sort out, and his writing is now heavily focused on food descriptions.

If he isn't meandering around a fictional food banquet, he is over on his live journal describing his experience watching football and eating hot dogs.

But those fictional food banquets he describes are incredible! I can just remember the way he described the food at Joffrey's wedding. He writes about food like I expect a fat man would. lmao.
 
Last edited:
The guy took a decade to get through his writers block, splitting the book into two. The first half being "A FEAST For Crows." The man needs to put down the chicken drumstick and finish the story.
 
I used to own this book but I don't own it anymore.
719IJfnMWEL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg
 
The first book I ever willingly read was the Harry Potter series, I was in grade school and would go to the midnight movie premiers whenever they came out.

The book that turned me into a reader was the Percy Jackson series, I was still young and it was my first introduction into a world of books, from the PJO series to the Kane Chronicles, all interconnected.

My favorite book is one I didn't find until adulthood, If We Were Villains by M.L. Rio. Second place is a tie between Song of Achilles by Madeline Miller and The Odyssey by Homer.
 
Really enjoy the Nevermoor / Morrigan Crow books a lot, got my fingers crossed that Silverborn doesn't get delayed again for a fourth? Fifth? Time in a row. Recently also read Bram Stoker's Jewel of the Seven Stars. The 1903 version is pretty good. The 1912 version sucks.
 
May come off as a boring pick, but Romance of the Three Kingdoms!
My other favorites are all non-fiction, however. So im not sure if they’re eligible for the thread.
 
Anything by Jeff Noon, but his Vurt trilogy is Zenith Fiction tbh:
Vurt, Pollen, Nymphomation

Also:
The Fifth Head of Cerberus, by Gene Wolfe.
Daemon, by Daniel Suarez.
Hard-Boiled Wonderland and The End of the World, by Haruki Murakami.
Futuristic Violence and Fancy Suits, by David Wong.
Sam Dunn is Dead, by Bruno Corra.
Ack-Ack Macaque, by Gareth Powell.
Welcome to the NHK, by Tatsuhiko Takimoto.

Currently reading The Gone-Away World by Nick Harkaway
 
Post books that you own that you really like.
Unfortunately, I lost all of my physical books during a low point in my life. I'd still like to contribute to this thread if that's alright.

Ill-MadeMute.jpg


I read this right out of high school and I remember it still because while the premise relies on the amnesia trope to give the protagonist a reason to travel, the payoff is interesting and quite unique. The only other book I've read that has done something similar is Ella Enchanted, another fantasy book I adore.

The main character is as the title describes: a mute, horribly disfigured boy who was found wandering aimlessly by an elderly scullery maid. He remains with her in the castle that she lives and works in, trapped in an abusive environment where he's subjected to royal cruelty and habitual abuse regarding his appearance. His caretaker is the source of his self-loathing as she berates him anytime he removes the hooded robes she makes him wear. The abuse affects him so much he refuses to look at his own body as he bathes.

As depressing as the opening chapters are, the rest of the book has a far more hopeful tone. The narrative mostly focuses on the boy's recovery from his trauma: regaining his sense of self-worth, undoing the self-hatred that was beaten into him, and learning to become a person that isn't defined by his physical scars or his disability. It touches upon difficult topics in a surprisingly mature way, my favorite being the way it portrays grappling with the complicated emotions that come with experiencing abuse at the hands of a parental figure. The emotional journey accompanies a literal one: the boy eventually leaves the castle, makes new friends, and gets into all sort of high fantasy hi-jinks as he searches for his lost memories.

The book is part of a trilogy but I can't recommend the other two. They introduce a love story that is painfully dull and the mute boy's characterization takes a nosedive in quality. Ill-made Mute is best experienced as a standalone novel.
 
This and author thread are stickied. That’s it for today.
 
I had a giant collection of Geronimo Stilton books when I was like 10
...And for some reason I gave them all away. But thankfully, I got some of them back!
 
My Top 5 are very generic choices, but eh, will share them anyway:
1) To Kill A Mockingbird By Harper Lee

- This one always makes me cry for some reason.

1743956493455.png


2) Kafka On The Shore By Haruki Murakami

- I mean, in my humble opinion, this is Murakami's finest and most intelligent work to date. It is the type of book where you learn or notice something new with every read that you might've missed the first time around.

1743956576427.png


3) Crime And Punishment by Fyodor Dostyovesky

- The plot still stays with me (i read it in winter of 2021; and I would wake up early in morning at 5AM just to read this. lol)


1743956667819.png


4) Salem's Lot by Stephen King

- My favorite King, and also my favorite Vampire novel (and yes, I have read dracula, lol)

1743956730937.png



5) Frankenstein by Mary Shelley

- I actually read this one to write a college entry thesis into a foreign university. Never got into the university because of the events that happened in 2020, but still, the plot stays with me till this day, and Shelley managed to give me great existential crisis by the end.


1743956834935.png
 
There's more, but here's my top three off the top of my head. Not sharing covers or pics because I'm at work right now
  • Los Santos Inocentes (The Holy Innocents), by Miguel Delibes
  • Cien Años de Soledad (A Hundred Years of Solitude), by Gabriel García Márquez
  • The Name of the Rose, by Umberto Eco
 
Probably biased because I'm still reading it but Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. It's pretty hard and time consuming but god damn what an amazing book it is. Super recommended if you want to start programming. 10/10
Fiction books honestly idk, there are a lot of light novel series I really love so it's hard to say.
 
Probably biased because I'm still reading it but Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs. It's pretty hard and time consuming but god damn what an amazing book it is. Super recommended if you want to start programming. 10/10
Fiction books honestly idk, there are a lot of light novel series I really love so it's hard to say.

Interesting, I was a computer science student back in the day. I'm curious, what's so good about that book?
 
Interesting, I was a computer science student back in the day. I'm curious, what's so good about that book?
Nice! I love how well it explains the CS fundamentals. It focuses very much into making you actually understand the underlying concepts behind things rather than just teaching you a language. It also uses Scheme, a LISP dialect to explain stuff, which makes life way easier rather than starting with other languages because the syntax is easy af so you don't have to waste time learning language-specific syntax stuff, which could be confusing as a first programming language. The book also guides you through building a lot of stuff, with a simple language like Scheme. Overall I really just love the book's style of explaining things. It's the textbook MIT used for their introductory courses from 1984 to 2007. It's a CS fundamentals book but it really covers all aspects of programming. It's often regarded as one of the best books in programming.
 
Nice! I love how well it explains the CS fundamentals. It focuses very much into making you actually understand the underlying concepts behind things rather than just teaching you a language. It also uses Scheme, a LISP dialect to explain stuff, which makes life way easier rather than starting with other languages because the syntax is easy af so you don't have to waste time learning language-specific syntax stuff, which could be confusing as a first programming language. The book also guides you through building a lot of stuff, with a simple language like Scheme. Overall I really just love the book's style of explaining things. It's the textbook MIT used for their introductory courses from 1984 to 2007.

Yeah the books I read in school were more interested in teaching syntax rather than the underlying concepts. A bunch of C/Java books that kept to the basics but never taught how to write maintainable code or how to create algorithmic efficiency. That's what I struggled the most with and I didn't feel like any of the teachers were interested in teaching that stuff. I was not the most proactive student, though. Some of it is my own fault for not seeking out other students who knew what they were doing.
 
Yeah the books I read in school were more interested in teaching syntax rather than the underlying concepts. A bunch of C/Java books that kept to the basics but never taught how to write maintainable code or how to create algorithmic efficiency. That's what I struggled the most with and I didn't feel like any of the teachers were interested in teaching that stuff.
Yeah, that's my main problem with most college CS courses. They just teach syntax and the generic stuff. Everyone can learn syntax and write some random BS code, it's not really anything special. You don't even need a college degree for that lol. An actual good programmer learns the underlying concepts and how stuff really works, that's what makes you different than the millions and thousands of code monkeys around and that's what colleges and unis should teach. Especially with the rise of AI programming.
I was not the most proactive student, though. Some of it is my own fault for not seeking out other students who knew what they were doing.
Yeah, Computer Science isn't something you can get by just listening to the lectures. I mean, you can, there's nothing stopping you and you're most likely going to graduate and get a job anyway, and that's fine for most people, but if you really want to be good at it then digging deeper and learning stuff on your own is what really makes the difference.
 
Yeah, Computer Science isn't something you can get by just listening to the lectures. I mean, you can, there's nothing stopping you and you're most likely going to graduate and get a job anyway, and that's fine for most people, but if you really want to be good at it then digging deeper and learning stuff on your own is what really makes the difference.
I don't mean to derail the thread, but the curriculums I've been through focus on learning how to learn, if that makes sense. I'm not a CompSci major, but without saying too much, I am in a very closely related STEM field.

The skills necessary to troubleshoot problems is crucial to learn, and I'd found that those skills could only be figured out by solving those problems on my own.

When your back is against the wall, bouncing ideas off of classmates is also incredibly important in learning the material, as a fresh set of eyes can bring up things that you may not have thought about initially.

To answer the thread question, one of my favorite books is Practical Electronics for Inventors. Very informative about a plethora of different components, filters, and circuits.

1743977985488.jpeg
 
I don't mean to derail the thread, but the curriculums I've been through focus on learning how to learn, if that makes sense. I'm not a CompSci major, but without saying too much, I am in a very closely related STEM field.
Yeah, I get it. I think it depends on the college/uni. I'm in a well-regarded uni in my country, but CS isn't really strong here so this probably plays a role.
The skills necessary to troubleshoot problems is crucial to learn, and I'd found that those skills could only be figured out by troubleshooting and solving problems on my own.
This is very true. Troubleshooting is a crucial skill to develop since you're literally going to be solving problems all the time lol. I learned how to troubleshoot stuff by doing stuff on my pc so it's second nature for me by now lol, but I really wonder how people who can't troubleshoot survive the industry 🤔
When your back is against the wall, bouncing ideas off of classmates is also incredibly important in learning the material, as a fresh set of eyes can bring up things that you may not have thought about initially.
Yeah. You can be the best programmer ever, but the one thing you can never get by yourself is other people's perspectives. Feedback from other people is always nice.
 
I don't mean to derail the thread, but the curriculums I've been through focus on learning how to learn, if that makes sense. I'm not a CompSci major, but without saying too much, I am in a very closely related STEM field.

The skills necessary to troubleshoot problems is crucial to learn, and I'd found that those skills could only be figured out by solving those problems on my own.

Yeah, its kind of building an instinct for it from years of experience. Unfortunately, I grew up in a different era where education was less forward thinking and it was more rote and memorization. The projects kind of felt like being thrown into the deep end of the pool with no guidance. I figured out how to learn much later in my life, after I had given up on my computer science education.

I had a bit of a naive view at the time, that I needed to figure out this stuff on my own and if others were able to do so and I couldn't it was a failure on my part. But now I realize that was an absurd mentality to have.

I also needed to do more side projects to target my areas of difficulty because the projects at school were too basic, giving me a false sense of confidence. Until they weren't and I couldn't figure out anything because all I knew how to do was write inefficient messy code.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Featured Video

Gintama Rumble (VITA)

Latest Threads

favorite video game childhood

What is your favorite video game childhood
Read more

JRPG's that you still can play after main story completition?

it's a rarity, but i think i have encountered a couple back then that offered that possibility...
Read more

What's your favourite sprite art from a video game?

Hi Everyone!

I'd love to see examples of people's favourite video game sprites from any era...
Read more

The theme of RGT-tan

1746762113150.png

What songs you feel like could her theme?


There's...
Read more

Godzilla: Monster of Monsters to me, is quite the enjoyable romp!

HOO-HOOT, greetings sons of man- nothing like a good game to stretch those talons over, right...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
159
Guests online
196
Total visitors
355

Forum statistics

Threads
7,676
Messages
191,031
Members
563,414
Latest member
Alireza00f

Support us

Back
Top