- Joined
- Sep 24, 2024
- Messages
- 1,091
- Level up in
- 1409 posts
- Reaction score
- 6,277
- Points
- 3,577
Yes, but – playing Devil's advocate here – couldn't you say the same thing about, say, jaguars?The issue is that witnesses weren't even sure what they saw.

Look at that creature! If you were, say, a Mayan or Aztec soldier doing his patrol at night, and you saw one of those things prowling around in the woods, and you'd never seen anything larger than a standard cat before, you might think "YIKES, THAT'S A MONSTER!!!", as their cultures did. It, of course, wasn't really a monster – it was just an animal that they didn't have the ability to capture, identify, and catalogue, yet. But, in the future, we now do, and can explain the jaguar logically.
Theoretically speaking, is there any reason something like Bigfoot couldn't be the same? There have been multiple, independent accounts of large, gorilla-like creatures in the woods and mountains spanning throughout the upper half of North America. A lot of that area, even with today's technology, is still uncharted. Isn't it conceivable that, maybe one day, we'll know that "Bigfoot" was just a member of the N. American Forest Gorilla genus?
Probably not, it's all a load of nonsense. But it's fun to imagine!