Digg's making a comeback after reddit stock plummets at all time low

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember when BlueSky supposed to replace X?
If it's so great, then why so many have returned to that shithole, and still post there no matter what?

Digg to Reddit, will be what Bsky is to X. The underdog, an extra platform to disperse everyone.
No, Reddit's equivalent of Bluesky is Lemmy. That is, it's a decentralized version of the old version of the original site without a lot of the BS that was imposed on it by the tech bro owner of the original site. Digg is the equivalent of... Reddit, but caught in a loop of enshittification. Twitter doesn't really have a enshittified predecessor to compare to.

People aren't going to Lemmy in droves because it's smaller and more technically complicated. And people won't go to Digg in droves because it won't likely ever get back to what it was before it was corrupted.

Social Media is the bane of all that is good about the Internet. Please let it all burn.
Social media could be good. But that requires it to be completely decentralized, cut off from the tech bro empires and monetization. The former is possible if the decentralized systems are made user-friendly enough to attract more people. The latter will be the hard part to get over, as the bastards making the most money off cynical garbage will fight tooth and nail to uphold the structure that allows them to earn money off of trash content.
 
How the mighty has fallen. I remember when Reddit was so free it was like 4chan with accounts and updoots.
 
It'll get a slight bit of attention for a few days (and that's being optimistic) after launch, then immediately drop off and everyone will go back to Reddit. How did I know that? Do I have some sort of a crystal ball? I'll never tell... ::winkfelix
the "we are shutting down third party API" reddit to lemmy migration of the other year amirite? such a huge fuss was kicked up, but i uh, i just kept using the same third party client i'd always been using with a tiny hotfix after the change

i did check out various federated spaces but they were all differing levels of the same insufferable shit i had already spent a large time building subreddit/keyword filter list to avoid. some federated spaces were pretty nice tho, felt a bit like old hackernews or similar
 
felt a bit like old hackernews or similar
Hacker News, to me, basically is the "good" Reddit (though it certainly has its own problems). I really hope this whole kerfuffle doesn't lead to a mass exodus to that site.
 
How the mighty has fallen. I remember when Reddit was so free it was like 4chan with accounts and updoots.
I still prefer 4chan. as depraved as it can be, I've seen alot of good criticism on /v/
check this thread for example

4**** was never good. They put on a mask (no pun) of being valuable to the world for about a year, but underneath it all they were always terrible. And they actually got worse as time passed, pushing for the horrors we see across social media nowadays. In fact, if it wasn't for Mark Zuckerberg, they would be patient zero for everything wrong with the internet now. (Instead, they are part of a convergent evolution of patient zero and parasite queen.) We'd have been better off if they never existed.
 
Social media could be good. But that requires it to be completely decentralized, cut off from the tech bro empires and monetization. The former is possible if the decentralized systems are made user-friendly enough to attract more people. The latter will be the hard part to get over, as the bastards making the most money off cynical garbage will fight tooth and nail to uphold the structure that allows them to earn money off of trash content.

A site as big as Reddit cannot be supported without the tech bros backing it. It is what it is. I'll give them a little credit for keeping the site relatively light on invasive monetization techniques given how big it is.

I still prefer 4chan. as depraved as it can be, I've seen alot of good criticism on /v/
check this thread for example

I'm sure there are good discussions on 4chan every once in a while, but there are good discussions on many sites. I prefer to stick to the sites where I don't have to deal with racial and homophobic slurs.
 
4**** was never good. They put on a mask (no pun) of being valuable to the world for about a year, but underneath it all they were always terrible. And they actually got worse as time passed, pushing for the horrors we see across social media nowadays. In fact, if it wasn't for Mark Zuckerberg, they would be patient zero for everything wrong with the internet now. (Instead, they are part of a convergent evolution of patient zero and parasite queen.) We'd have been better off if they never existed.
People who hold this opinion know nothing of 4chan other than the horror stories they heard about /b/ and /pol/. Don't get me wrong, those horror stories are true for the most part but 4chan is so much more than that. Unfortunately, even the mighty fall at some point and half is no exception here. It's a far cry from what it used to be in 2009. You can argue that doxxing people and harassing their employers and family started there but man, Twitter and Reddit took that concept to its logical extreme and made it so that you can't say anything at all without someone getting offended and trying to ruin your life. At least with 4chan it was usually people who were real pieces of work.

Half may have pioneered some of the worst practices we see on the Internet today but they weren't the ones to introduce the mindset of virtue signalling and purity spiraling to the lowest common denominator that hangs out on Facebook.

On the bright side, 4chan used to be the premiere site to discover obscure media, be it anime, heavy metal or whatever your heart desired looooong before there were any wikis or YouTube channels dedicated to that sort of stuff but acknowledging that fact would go against the '4chan = pure evil' propaganda.

4chan has and has always had its faults but pretending that it was never good for anything is ignorant at best. Minor disclaimer here - I haven't been a regular over there since about 2014 so I can't vouch for the state of the boards in current year but it used to be something special. It wouldn't have gathered any sort of following, let alone the kind of following it used to have otherwise and that's a fact no matter how much anyone likes it or not.
 
On the bright side, 4chan used to be the premiere site to discover obscure media, be it anime, heavy metal or whatever your heart desired looooong before there were any wikis or YouTube channels dedicated to that sort of stuff but acknowledging that fact would go against the '4chan = pure evil' propaganda.

I don't know. It's always had the reputation of being a cesspool. The few times I've seen /v/ get screen capped it is some edgy slur filled rant about some random anime or video game. Maybe it isn't as bad as its reputation indicates, but I don't feel like the site brings anything of value I couldn't find anywhere else outside of memes.

Also, I've been on the internet since the 90's and there's never been a lack of sites covering anime, heavy metal or video games. Those are probably the 3 topics where there's an extreme oversaturation of discourse on the web.
 
People who hold this opinion know nothing of 4chan other than the horror stories they heard about /b/ and /pol/. Don't get me wrong, those horror stories are true for the most part but 4chan is so much more than that. Unfortunately, even the mighty fall at some point and half is no exception here. It's a far cry from what it used to be in 2009. You can argue that doxxing people and harassing their employers and family started there but man, Twitter and Reddit took that concept to its logical extreme and made it so that you can't say anything at all without someone getting offended and trying to ruin your life. At least with 4chan it was usually people who were real pieces of work.

Half may have pioneered some of the worst practices we see on the Internet today but they weren't the ones to introduce the mindset of virtue signalling and purity spiraling to the lowest common denominator that hangs out on Facebook.

On the bright side, 4chan used to be the premiere site to discover obscure media, be it anime, heavy metal or whatever your heart desired looooong before there were any wikis or YouTube channels dedicated to that sort of stuff but acknowledging that fact would go against the '4chan = pure evil' propaganda.

4chan has and has always had its faults but pretending that it was never good for anything is ignorant at best. Minor disclaimer here - I haven't been a regular over there since about 2014 so I can't vouch for the state of the boards in current year but it used to be something special. It wouldn't have gathered any sort of following, let alone the kind of following it used to have otherwise and that's a fact no matter how much anyone likes it or not.
I was around before 4chan. We had plenty of places to discover obscure media; 4chan was just used by the people who didn't get out more and explore, whether online or offline. The terms "hipster" and "scenester" existed because people actually did that before the internet and even continued to do it online without 4chan.

Twitter wasn't originally as bad before it absorbed 4chan's mindset. Reddit even had a ban on doxxing throughout its history. 4chan was always doing despicable shit and never truly made up for it, unlike the other social media sites which, for all their faults, sometimes did.

Oh, "virtual signaling", huh? 🙄 I'm hand-waving that argument away on the basis of that term alone. Seriously, everything before "but" already ruined any argument for their value. Yes, they did pioneer the worst of the internet; that's reason enough to say they are the worst.

"Has its faults" is putting it mildly. They couldn't have been worse if all the big tech bros were running them together, especially because they're worse than almost all of their sites (modern Twitter excluded, as it has basically becoming 4chan 2).
 
Quite frankly, when I heard 4**** was responsible for this catastrophe:

L6q7pKK.gif


I turned off my PC in disgust. The poole's closed, you fascists.
 
People who hold this opinion know nothing of 4chan other than the horror stories they heard about /b/ and /pol/. Don't get me wrong, those horror stories are true for the most part but 4chan is so much more than that. Unfortunately, even the mighty fall at some point and half is no exception here. It's a far cry from what it used to be in 2009. You can argue that doxxing people and harassing their employers and family started there but man, Twitter and Reddit took that concept to its logical extreme and made it so that you can't say anything at all without someone getting offended and trying to ruin your life. At least with 4chan it was usually people who were real pieces of work.

Half may have pioneered some of the worst practices we see on the Internet today but they weren't the ones to introduce the mindset of virtue signalling and purity spiraling to the lowest common denominator that hangs out on Facebook.

On the bright side, 4chan used to be the premiere site to discover obscure media, be it anime, heavy metal or whatever your heart desired looooong before there were any wikis or YouTube channels dedicated to that sort of stuff but acknowledging that fact would go against the '4chan = pure evil' propaganda.

4chan has and has always had its faults but pretending that it was never good for anything is ignorant at best. Minor disclaimer here - I haven't been a regular over there since about 2014 so I can't vouch for the state of the boards in current year but it used to be something special. It wouldn't have gathered any sort of following, let alone the kind of following it used to have otherwise and that's a fact no matter how much anyone likes it or not.
4chan (and 8ch) are just what people do when they're anonymous. anyone can do evil shit if they know they can't have their life ruined for it, plus moot hated /pol/
Post automatically merged:

Quite frankly, when I heard 4**** was responsible for this catastrophe:

L6q7pKK.gif


I turned off my PC in disgust. The poole's closed, you fascists.
consequences will never be the same!
Post automatically merged:

I was around before 4chan. We had plenty of places to discover obscure media; 4chan was just used by the people who didn't get out more and explore, whether online or offline. The terms "hipster" and "scenester" existed because people actually did that before the internet and even continued to do it online without 4chan.

Twitter wasn't originally as bad before it absorbed 4chan's mindset. Reddit even had a ban on doxxing throughout its history. 4chan was always doing despicable shit and never truly made up for it, unlike the other social media sites which, for all their faults, sometimes did.

Oh, "virtual signaling", huh? 🙄 I'm hand-waving that argument away on the basis of that term alone. Seriously, everything before "but" already ruined any argument for their value. Yes, they did pioneer the worst of the internet; that's reason enough to say they are the worst.

"Has its faults" is putting it mildly. They couldn't have been worse if all the big tech bros were running them together, especially because they're worse than almost all of their sites (modern Twitter excluded, as it has basically becoming 4chan 2).
I don't get banned by janitors for saying cis but okay lol
 
4chan (and 8ch) are just what people do when they're anonymous. anyone can do evil shit if they know they can't have their life ruined for it, plus moot hated /pol/

Eh, I think its more like the people who have those feelings gravitate to those sites so they can find likeminded people who tolerate racism and homophobia. Those who don't get off on hatred and making jokes at the expense of others have no need for sites like those.
 
Eh, I think its more like the people who have those feelings gravitate to those sites so they can find likeminded people who tolerate racism and homophobia. Those who don't get off on hatred and making jokes at the expense of others have no need for sites like those.
idk, I'm a bi feminist who has a main preference for men and the slurs don't affect me.
 
idk, I'm a bi feminist who has a main preference for men and the slurs don't affect me.
Anecdotal evidence doesn't matter. A single person being okay with it does not represent the vast majority of people. If you've ever gotten assaulted by homophobes and/or racists, you'd likely have a much different take on that sort of thing. And plenty of BIPOC and LGBT+ people have experienced that.
 
Not gonna lie, I expected this to go over much worse than it did. 4chan has earned its reputation, no doubt about that. Some of the most heinous crap that was going on on the Internet of the day could be traced back to the place. At the same time there were quite a few good things that also happened on half that nobody talks about. Nobody will tell you about Operation Shellshock which involved us finding the degenerates who thought it was a fun idea to douse a turtle in flammable liquid and set it on fire and then smash it against the sidewalk until the poor thing was no more. Nobody will tell you about Operation Safe Winter which involved us helping the homeless around the world, often against the governments' will. Nobody will tell you that we fought against SOPA and PIPA along with everyone else who understood what was at stake, though that was before Occupy Wall Street so pretty much everyone was on board. I'm 100% sure today's Reddit and Wikipedia would march against us if it were to happen again. Nobody will tell you about the time we found an old WWII veteran who was organizing a small birthday party whom we sent birthday cards to make his day (Rest in Peace, William). And that's just a drop in the ocean of good things 4chan did.

There were of course more divisive but still good causes like messing with Scientologists or Al-Qaeda. Those who were around will recognize LOIC.

There was the dumb fun that was trolling Shia Lebouf. There were silly internal conflicts like Boxxy Wars and Operation Valkyrie among others. There were meme wars we waged against those who stole our memes and tried to take credit. Incredibly silly in hindsight but back then it was srs bsns. There were times we waged war against 4chan too. I remember at least two instances of moot trying to remove /b/ only for it to backfire massively since /b/tards' chosen course of action was to just DDoS 4chan as a whole in response and when that wasn't a viable option shitting up every thread available would do. That's where the term 'containment board' originated.

There was, of course, the horrible. The gore threads, the CP and beastiality some people tried to post as soon as 'the mods were asleep', the revenge porn, quite a while before the term was even a thing I believe.

As far as racist and sexist memes are concerned I can't really judge. They were there, absolutely. Some of them I found funny, others irrelevant moreso than anything else. I dunno if it's me having mental fortitude or what but a dumb meme has yet to influence how I see a person. I apply Tom Araya's philosophy to these things. 'If a Slayer song is enough to make you question your faith then it was never that strong to begin with'. I'll happily laugh at stereotypes associated with anyone and anything but if you think it goes any deeper than that that's a you problem, at least as far as I'm concerned.

I too existed on the Internet before 4chan was a thing. I remember Anime Web Turnpike of all things for some reason as well as other sites like rotten.com and local sites I used to visit way back when but 4chan is where everything I liked about the Internet kinda coalesced back then. As such, I have a soft spot for the place.

Shadilay frens and praise Kek.
 
Exceedingly well-put, Clippy.

I don't have anything to add to this conversation – I'm sure you can guess my viewpoint, and I'm not looking for an argument – except that I was born and bred on forum culture in the late 2000s/early 2010s, and to say that 4chan somehow has a monopoly on or was the source of offensive internet material is unbelievably naive. Some of the things we'd discuss on Sonic CuLT or Sonic Retro or VGBoards or the Newgrounds BBS or the AlbinoBlackSheep forums or the comments section of John K.'s blog would have made your little heads spin like a top. It was OK back then because the internet was still a secret club and not yet serious business. Also:

rotten.com
This, and the underground internet culture that surrounded it (including Jerkcity, Leisure Town, the NNDB, etc. etc.), too. Offensive material and politically-incorrect humour has existed on the internet since the year dot, and 4chan, in addition to being actually pretty tame by a lot of pre-set standards, was a very, very late-comer to the party.
 
Exceedingly well-put, Clippy.

I don't have anything to add to this conversation – I'm sure you can guess my viewpoint, and I'm not looking for an argument – except that I was born and bred on forum culture in the late 2000s/early 2010s, and to say that 4chan somehow has a monopoly on or was the source of offensive internet material is unbelievably naive. Some of the things we'd discuss on Sonic CuLT or Sonic Retro or VGBoards or the Newgrounds BBS or the AlbinoBlackSheep forums or the comments section of John K.'s blog would have made your little heads spin like a top. It was OK back then because the internet was still a secret club and not yet serious business. Also:


This, and the underground internet culture that surrounded it (including Jerkcity, Leisure Town, the NNDB, etc. etc.), too. Offensive material and politically-incorrect humour has existed on the internet since the year dot, and 4chan, in addition to being actually pretty tame by a lot of pre-set standards, was a very, very late-comer to the party.
lemon party.jpg

I had to. As disgusting as the old Internet could be at times people who are in favor of censorship are either too stupid to understand what it entails or traitors to humanity.
 
Not gonna lie, I expected this to go over much worse than it did. 4chan has earned its reputation, no doubt about that. Some of the most heinous crap that was going on on the Internet of the day could be traced back to the place. At the same time there were quite a few good things that also happened on half that nobody talks about. Nobody will tell you about Operation Shellshock which involved us finding the degenerates who thought it was a fun idea to douse a turtle in flammable liquid and set it on fire and then smash it against the sidewalk until the poor thing was no more. Nobody will tell you about Operation Safe Winter which involved us helping the homeless around the world, often against the governments' will. Nobody will tell you that we fought against SOPA and PIPA along with everyone else who understood what was at stake, though that was before Occupy Wall Street so pretty much everyone was on board. I'm 100% sure today's Reddit and Wikipedia would march against us if it were to happen again. Nobody will tell you about the time we found an old WWII veteran who was organizing a small birthday party whom we sent birthday cards to make his day (Rest in Peace, William). And that's just a drop in the ocean of good things 4chan did.

There were of course more divisive but still good causes like messing with Scientologists or Al-Qaeda. Those who were around will recognize LOIC.

There was the dumb fun that was trolling Shia Lebouf. There were silly internal conflicts like Boxxy Wars and Operation Valkyrie among others. There were meme wars we waged against those who stole our memes and tried to take credit. Incredibly silly in hindsight but back then it was srs bsns. There were times we waged war against 4chan too. I remember at least two instances of moot trying to remove /b/ only for it to backfire massively since /b/tards' chosen course of action was to just DDoS 4chan as a whole in response and when that wasn't a viable option shitting up every thread available would do. That's where the term 'containment board' originated.

There was, of course, the horrible. The gore threads, the CP and beastiality some people tried to post as soon as 'the mods were asleep', the revenge porn, quite a while before the term was even a thing I believe.

As far as racist and sexist memes are concerned I can't really judge. They were there, absolutely. Some of them I found funny, others irrelevant moreso than anything else. I dunno if it's me having mental fortitude or what but a dumb meme has yet to influence how I see a person. I apply Tom Araya's philosophy to these things. 'If a Slayer song is enough to make you question your faith then it was never that strong to begin with'. I'll happily laugh at stereotypes associated with anyone and anything but if you think it goes any deeper than that that's a you problem, at least as far as I'm concerned.

I too existed on the Internet before 4chan was a thing. I remember Anime Web Turnpike of all things for some reason as well as other sites like rotten.com and local sites I used to visit way back when but 4chan is where everything I liked about the Internet kinda coalesced back then. As such, I have a soft spot for the place.

Shadilay frens and praise Kek.

This whole argument of this strikes me as "Hannibal Lecter was a nice guy because he helps the FBI catch serial killers." with a dose of "I'm white and I don't experience racism, therefore it doesn't exist."

Even if I assume that the people making the poor taste jokes aren't racist (which is debatable), some of them were incredibly unfunny and just punching down at downtrodden countries like Brazil and Africa. Just some elitist dudebro ideology that is really abhorrent to me. Its not so much that the jokes themselves offend my sensibilities, its that I don't wish to hang out with people who find those types of jokes funny. Maybe in my teenage years, the shock value of these jokes would impress me, but at this point in my life I don't find any value in trying to be the shittiest person possible.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 44692
I had to. As disgusting as the old Internet could be at times people who are in favor of censorship are either too stupid to understand what it entails or traitors to humanity.

No one mentioned censorship but yourself. As long as the Klan rally stays in their dark corner of the internet, its fine. Also, freedom of speech doesn't entail you to freedom of being called a shitty person for said speech.

tumblr_lta9iyis8w1r0i9pfo1_500.jpg
 
Last edited:
Not gonna lie, I expected this to go over much worse than it did. 4chan has earned its reputation, no doubt about that. Some of the most heinous crap that was going on on the Internet of the day could be traced back to the place. At the same time there were quite a few good things that also happened on half that nobody talks about. Nobody will tell you about Operation Shellshock which involved us finding the degenerates who thought it was a fun idea to douse a turtle in flammable liquid and set it on fire and then smash it against the sidewalk until the poor thing was no more. Nobody will tell you about Operation Safe Winter which involved us helping the homeless around the world, often against the governments' will. Nobody will tell you that we fought against SOPA and PIPA along with everyone else who understood what was at stake, though that was before Occupy Wall Street so pretty much everyone was on board. I'm 100% sure today's Reddit and Wikipedia would march against us if it were to happen again. Nobody will tell you about the time we found an old WWII veteran who was organizing a small birthday party whom we sent birthday cards to make his day (Rest in Peace, William). And that's just a drop in the ocean of good things 4chan did.

There were of course more divisive but still good causes like messing with Scientologists or Al-Qaeda. Those who were around will recognize LOIC.

There was the dumb fun that was trolling Shia Lebouf. There were silly internal conflicts like Boxxy Wars and Operation Valkyrie among others. There were meme wars we waged against those who stole our memes and tried to take credit. Incredibly silly in hindsight but back then it was srs bsns. There were times we waged war against 4chan too. I remember at least two instances of moot trying to remove /b/ only for it to backfire massively since /b/tards' chosen course of action was to just DDoS 4chan as a whole in response and when that wasn't a viable option shitting up every thread available would do. That's where the term 'containment board' originated.

There was, of course, the horrible. The gore threads, the CP and beastiality some people tried to post as soon as 'the mods were asleep', the revenge porn, quite a while before the term was even a thing I believe.

As far as racist and sexist memes are concerned I can't really judge. They were there, absolutely. Some of them I found funny, others irrelevant moreso than anything else. I dunno if it's me having mental fortitude or what but a dumb meme has yet to influence how I see a person. I apply Tom Araya's philosophy to these things. 'If a Slayer song is enough to make you question your faith then it was never that strong to begin with'. I'll happily laugh at stereotypes associated with anyone and anything but if you think it goes any deeper than that that's a you problem, at least as far as I'm concerned.

I too existed on the Internet before 4chan was a thing. I remember Anime Web Turnpike of all things for some reason as well as other sites like rotten.com and local sites I used to visit way back when but 4chan is where everything I liked about the Internet kinda coalesced back then. As such, I have a soft spot for the place.
Doing little nice things and having fun doesn't absolve any of the massive amount of bad that 4chan did. The KKK sometimes adopts highways and does little niceties for their members; they also killed more Americans than any other terrorist group in US history. Bill Cosby was America's father and a crowning icon of the Black community at the same time that he was a serial rapist. Jeffrey Jones was a funny actor before he got arrested for CSAM. DW Griffith and John Landis both made films that were vital to the evolution of the art form; the former revived the KKK, and the latter remorselessly murdered an old man and two children. (Full disclosure: I enjoyed The Twilight Zone: The Movie before learning about what happened and even still love An American Werewolf in London. I still think Landis deserved to be blacklisted and I don't care that we'll never see another film from him again.)

We could go on with this for a while, but the fact of the matter is that small contributions to society, and sometimes even big contributions, don't automatically forgive committing horrible acts. Doing nothing to atone for those acts, and going even further and committing even more of them, cancels out the good. And 4chan will never make up for what they've done, either because of the gravity of it or because they just aren't the type to do so.

Nobody cares if you, personally, were influenced or not. That's not even what is being argued. What matters is that numerous others were influenced to become hatemongers or become worse hatemongers (that is, active assailants of the innocent). Propaganda is a problem because it works regardless of whether you think it does or not. The entire advertising industry is built on this fact. Coca-Cola doesn't spend multimillions on postering themselves like Mussolini because they think you're going to forget them; they spend it so that you'll subconsciously think of them as the soda, the drink you should buy if you are thirsty or at a restaurant. And they don't care if you, personally, don't buy Coca-Cola, because there's a shit-ton of people out there that it'll work perfectly fine on. And it works no different with bigotry.

I was on the internet nearly a decade before 4chan existed. You do not need to tell me about how it was. But back then, the garbage they produced was sequestered to a limited set of sites. Before 4chan, it was only on Rotten and other shock sites, and sometimes reposted at other small forums. And before that, it was just Stormfront and the like. But none of those were ever able to amass a following of the scale that 4chan did. None of them had the influence. None of them leaked their ideas out into the larger offline world and managed to ruin people's lives or end them. And they didn't influence normal sites to become the same or worse.

I had to. As disgusting as the old Internet could be at times people who are in favor of censorship are either too stupid to understand what it entails or traitors to humanity.
Criticism is not censorship. If someone has the right to say asshole things, others have the right to call them assholes. That is real freedom of speech.

And let's make one thing clear that the 4chan crowd doesn't get until they get arrested: nobody has a right to absolute freedom of speech. Every single country on Earth has a legal concept called reasonable restrictions on speech. These are laws that stop speech or media that causes serious and obvious harm to others. That generally includes laws against death threats, CSAM, inciting a panic, inciting a riot, inciting an attack on the government, and inciting a lynch mob. (There are others, too, depending on the country.) So if they get arrested for that shit, they won't be "censored"; they will be arrested for a real crime with real consequences that nobody in their right mind will defend.

This is not stupidity. This is not "tReAsOn To HuMaNiTy." 🙄 This is being civilized. This is being not a pedophile. This is being not a murderer. This is living in the real world, not in a cesspool of idiotic psychopathic fantasy.
 
Last edited:
Doing little nice things and having fun doesn't absolve any of the massive amount of bad that 4chan did. The KKK sometimes adopts highways and does little niceties for their members; they also killed more Americans than any other terrorist group in US history. Bill Cosby was America's father and a crowning icon of the Black community at the same time that he was a serial rapist. Jeffrey Jones was a funny actor before he got arrested for CP. DW Griffith and John Landis both made films that were vital to the evolution of the art form; the former revived the KKK, and the latter remorselessly murdered an old man and two children. (Full disclosure: I enjoyed The Twilight Zone: The Movie before learning about what happened and even still love An American Werewolf in London. I still think Landis deserved to be blacklisted and I don't care that we'll never see another film from him again.)

We could go on with this for a while, but the fact of the matter is that small contributions to society, and sometimes even big contributions, don't automatically forgive committing horrible acts. Doing nothing to atone for those acts, and going even further and committing even more of them, cancels out the good. And 4chan will never make up for what they've done, either because of the gravity of it or because they just aren't the type to do so.

Nobody cares if you, personally, were influenced or not. That's not even what is being argued. What matters is that numerous others were influenced to become hatemongers or become worse hatemongers (that is, active assailants of the innocent). Propaganda is a problem because it works regardless of whether you think it does or not. The entire advertising industry is built on this fact. Coca-Cola doesn't spend multimillions on postering themselves like Mussolini because they think you're going to forget them; they spend it so that you'll subconsciously think of them as the soda, the drink you should buy if you are thirsty or at a restaurant. And they don't care if you, personally, don't buy Coca-Cola, because there's a shit-ton of people out there that it'll work perfectly fine on. And it works no different with bigotry.

I was on the internet nearly a decade before 4chan existed. You do not need to tell me about how it was. But back then, the garbage they produced was sequestered to a limited set of sites. Before 4chan, it was only on Rotten and other shock sites, and sometimes reposted at other small forums. And before that, it was just Stormfront and the like. But none of those were ever able to amass a following of the scale that 4chan did. None of them had the influence. None of them leaked their ideas out into the larger offline world and managed to ruin people's lives or end them. And they didn't influence normal sites to become the same or worse.


Criticism is not censorship. If someone has the right to say asshole things, others have the right to call them assholes. That is real freedom of speech.

And let's make one thing clear that the 4chan crowd doesn't get until they get arrested: nobody has a right to absolute freedom of speech. Every single country on Earth has a legal concept called reasonable restrictions on speech. These are laws that stop speech or media that causes serious and obvious harm to others. That generally includes laws against death threats, CSAM, inciting a panic, inciting a riot, inciting an attack on the government, and inciting a lynch mob. (There are others, too, depending on the country.) So if they get arrested for that shit, they won't be "censored"; they will be arrested for a real crime with real consequences that nobody in their right mind will defend.

This is not stupidity. This is not "tReAsOn To HuMaNiTy." 🙄 This is being civilized. This is being not a pedophile. This is being not a murderer. This is living in the real world, not in a cesspool of idiotic psychopathic fantasy.

Didn't 4Chan cyber bully people into suicide? I'm not sure of the details, but I remember some controversy about that. I'm not sure what to ascribe to QAnon or 4Chan, where one entity ends and the other begins. To claim that 4Chan is a force of good is a dubious claim at best.

Anyway, QAnon always tried to position themselves as "robin hoods" and champions of the common person but they exposed themselves as frauds when they supported a coup attempt of a democratic country. That's the type of trash that hangs out on 4chan.
 
Last edited:
Well, my original argument was that 4Chan can do good and that claiming that it is nothing but evil is ignorant and false. I did not write anything that would amount to '4Chan is a force for good'. That's on you guys. Same goes for arguing that bad people are still bad even if they've done something nice once in their lives or whether or not 4Chan can make up for the atrocities it was a part of. I never made any arguments to the contrary in the context of 4Chan. 4Chan was and probably still is a menace. All I said is that the site has at least a few good deeds under its belt and I provided examples that prove that much. Can't really address anything else even if I don't disagree with you since it's simply not relevant to anything I said. I saw misinformation and I corrected it. Anyone who interpreted that as me saying that 4Chan ever was a nice place filled with sunshine and rainbows has only themselves to blame.

Also, freedom of speech doesn't entail you to freedom of being called a shitty person for said speech.

Criticism is not censorship. If someone has the right to say asshole things, others have the right to call them assholes. That is real freedom of speech.
Absolutely correct. And also not what I argued at all. Criticism happens when person A says something, person B doesn't like and is vocal about it. Censorship is when person A is legally not allowed to say something because it might offend person B even if they're not there to hear it. Two completely different things. I promised myself I wouldn't get snarky here but I honestly thought you two were better than that.

nobody has a right to absolute freedom of speech. Every single country on Earth has a legal concept called reasonable restrictions on speech. These are laws that stop speech or media that causes serious and obvious harm to others. That generally includes laws against death threats, CSAM, inciting a panic, inciting a riot, inciting an attack on the government, and inciting a lynch mob.
I find myself an unwilling ally of yours here. I'm not a fan of laws on speech of any kind. However, I understand that absolute freedom of speech is impossible for practical reasons. My freedom ends where your freedom begins and vice versa. As such we have legal concepts of slander, defamation, libel, incitement of violence and so on and so forth. They are a necessary evil that allows us to keep other freedoms and liberties. Wouldn't be funny if I had a crowd of people following me all day chanting 'Clippy deserves to die' because we all know someone would be impressionable enough to cave my skull in and believe they're doing it for a just cause. Then again, maybe they'd be doing me a favor by putting me out of my misery.

This is being civilized. This is being not a pedophile. This is being not a murderer. This is living in the real world, not in a cesspool of idiotic psychopathic fantasy.
This is the same exact argument my local Bible thumpers use. How can you be a good person without God and the Good Book? Bestie, I can think for myself. I don't need to be threatened with eternal damnation or cops showing up at my place not to be a pedophile or a murderer. Who do people think they are to believe that not only they know better than me what is right or wrong but also that they have some sort of mandate or imperative to tell me how to live my life. With that said, I've been around long enough to know that there are enough people out there who need to have the fear of God or law beaten into them lest they be dangerous to either themselves or people around them. I cri evrytiem when I think of the lowest common denominator and how everyone has to be held to that standard if we want to maintain the notion of equality. Am I allowed to not find the situation ideal and express my dissatisfaction with it or does that still make me a psychopath?

tReAsOn To HuMaNiTy
Mock me all you want but I believe that if it wasn't for the people who believed in freedoms and liberties we'd still be living like medieval peasants subject to every whim of our masters. It was those brave people that freed us from religious oppression and made documents like Magna Carta or constitutions happen. It's because of them that we have any rights at all. Anyone who goes against the principles of freedom is working towards bringing us back to the Dark Ages and this is something I will always stand against.

Didn't 4Chan cyber bully people into suicide? I'm not sure of the details, but I remember some controversy about that. I'm not sure what to ascribe to QAnon or 4Chan, where one entity ends and the other begins. To claim that 4Chan is a force of good is a dubious claim at best.
This was after the bulk of my time there but I can provide some answers. I don't know about bullying people into suicide but I can't rule it out. It's not like I have an encyclopedic knowledge of every single thread that happened in my time let alone afterwards. I know that Kiwi Farms had that sort of accusation lobbied at them so maybe that's what you're thinking of.

QAnon was (is?) an 8Chan thing. A different website with similar theme, arguably worse if you can imagine that. The guys who run the place, Watkins father-son duo either were Q or were very close with the guy. I think the jury is still out on that one.
 
Social Media is the bane of all that is good about the Internet. Please let it all burn.
Wow! It's almost like suggesting that they plan to start paywalling certain pages has consequences or something!
Post automatically merged:


Hate to burst your bubble, but even forums like this fall under the definition.
I'd say the difference is how content is fed to the user. Content on a forum is mostly chronological, and it's up to the user to seek out what they want beyond that. Mainstream social media sites use algorithms to keep you addicted, pissed off, and engaged regardless of how good it is for your mental health.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Support this Site

RGT relies on you to stay afloat. Help covering the site costs and get some pretty Level 7 perks too.

Featured Video

Latest Threads

All RGT OG'S hang out here.

I wanna see the OG's of this website. (say "here!")

requirments: need to be well-known or celeb...
Read more

[DC] Hello Kitty Waku Waku Cookies + Lovely Fruit Park English Translation Patches

Hello again,

I've done 2 more Hello Kitty games for Sega Dreamcast, Hello Kitty Waku Waku...
Read more

Metal Slader Glory: Director's Cut

Just noticed this gem in the ROM section

Metal Slader Glory.jpg


I immediately posted some...
Read more

Tecmo Super Bowl 2025

TSB-2025-2.png

The classic NES sports title, updated for the 2025-26 NFL season! Enjoy...​

Read more

Online statistics

Members online
83
Guests online
161
Total visitors
244

Forum statistics

Threads
12,659
Messages
308,735
Members
868,105
Latest member
CASIOvero1

Advertisers

Back
Top