about console war

there were also computers wars and peripheral wars.
Though on PC nowadays it is moot as we have basically cpu and gpu monopoly
 
there were also computers wars and peripheral wars.
Though on PC nowadays it is moot as we have basically cpu and gpu monopoly
Yep. had a Mac growing up. Everyone else had Windows. ._. DOS is alien to me.
 
console wars are why we have good games in the first place, forgetting the war is how we end up with no games at all. All those companies lost their way and are no longer competing with each other. Now they just match each other's constantly rising prices. Back during the old console wars, they would compete with the lowest prices and the customer would win every time.
I think the console wars ended at the start of either the eighth or possibly the seventh generation.

TL:DR: Console hardware unified with the rest of the tech industry, defeating the point of exclusives altogether. Read on if you want my long-ass explanation.

From the eighth generation onward (ninth for Nintendo), the hardware was standardized to common devices (X86 for Xbox/PlayStation and ARM for Nintendo). The generation before, all three systems used (vastly different) PowerPC architectures.

(I'm kinda putting Nintendo into both Wii and Wii U since they didn't align exactly with the timeline due using PowerPC in the eighth generation).

In the prior (sixth) generation, it was still kinda weird. Nintendo went with PowerPC like the Wii/Wii U, but it was the first time out for a console to do that (barring the Pippin but I don't even think Apple counts that anymore). The PS2 was the weirdest one by continuing on from the PS1 with a RISC-based MIPS processor. And while the Xbox was effectively a PC, it was a really weird proprietary one with a black box of an Nvidia GPU. Even the Dreamcast (much like the Saturn) used a custom CPU from the company mostly known for giving women orgasms (Hitachi... with the Magic Wand... if you're curious).

::smirk1

Prior generations were basically this way as well, using some custom setup based on popular components at the time. NES/SNES had a overclocked Commodore 64/Apple IIGS CPU, Genesis with a Motorola 68K like the Amiga, Macintosh and countless other machines. The Master System used a Z80 like on the Game Boy (also as a coprocessor on the NES and Genesis). And of course NEC with their own stuff codeveloped with Hudson Soft.

The point is that these wildly different architechtures lead to developers making different games for different platforms. This lead to what is often referred to as a second-party game. That is, a console/platform exclusive made by a third-party (think Square's run on the SNES or Electronic Arts on the Genesis). This is where most of the concepts of console exclusives come from. While the console developers themselves made a lot of games for their systems, they were still an overall minority compared to what third parties put out on their consoles in total. Even ports of the same game felt and played different on separate systems. For instance, I prefer Sparkster on the SNES compared to the Genesis, and Desert Strike on the Genesis compared to the SNES.

As an aside, taking into account the vast power (and cost) differences with PC, that was effectly a second-party only platform till about the 6th generation (considering there is no first-party since it's an open platform for the most part).

Long rant/post, but the point I'm getting at here is that as the consoles standardized, the concept of second-party games have slowly began to dissapear. This leaves only a handful of first-party games for each system with the rest being on whatever will run them from third-party developers. The only reason most second-party games exist today is more due to intentional platform licensing and not limitations. It's why the "just get a PC" meme exists: Because that's what you're effectively doing with both PlayStation and Xbox... with Nintendo of course insisting on being the outlier despite also using the same type of architechture as the most popular platform for gaming now: Smartphones.

A more entertaining/possibly quicker explanation than me in this video:
 
Ya I'm a vet of the OG console wars, playground Grade School Tossing out the "Ya well Sonic can beat Mario in a foot race" and "Mario would just shoot Sonic with fireballs" etc. etc.

It was a fun time to get pissed off at your friends. I've forgotten a lot of the stuff about the console wars, been decades ago, mind you. And yeah, if you didn't grow up in that sweet spot of the NES, SNES, and Sega Genesis / Master System being new, you won't really understand.

Most of what I was going to say has already been said in this thread. But ya looking back on it, it was just goofy, silly, pointless arguing by kids. Adults had no excuse. And honestly, I'm glad I grew up during that time in gaming history. Like some of you in this thread, aside from the OG Atari, I have seen the release and end of life of every system since the NES.

Good times, good times.
 
Console wars are fun as long as you don’t actually take it super seriously. It does not matter where somebody chooses to play their games and that’s final. But, it IS fun to get in cute debates about games and specs and all that. As long as you aren’t putting somebody down for real for their choice of place to play, then it’s all in good fun.
 
Console wars was for poor folks who couldnt afford both/all, I waited years till war was over and got both/all for cheap and with games overload.
 
Because how else are we supposed to express our basic human need for tribalism?
::cirnoshrug
 
Console wars was for poor folks who couldnt afford both/all, I waited years till war was over and got both/all for cheap and with games overload.
dude i couldn't afford a NES/Genesis expansion titles/SNES until i was able to work at McDonald's, and that was years after Sega stopped making consoles. I was born in 89. ._. I had 4 games on the Genesis. Sonic 1, Columns, Taz Escape From Mars, and Toy Story. arguably good titles, but man if i could have supported Sega more back then, I would have.
Post automatically merged:

Because how else are we supposed to express our basic human need for tribalism?
::cirnoshrug
Shining Force Vs. Fire Emblem, Phantasy Star Vs. Final Fantasy/Chrono Trigger/Super Mario RPG....
 
I was lucky enough to have parents who loved video games, so we had a SNES and a Genesis, and later an N64 and a Playstation. I never really got into console war stuff as a result, and always found it kinda silly.
 
I hate that it's still going on. No matter how many times I tell YouTube not to recommend such channels, it keeps trying to shove videos with thumbnails of wojaks in PS and Xbox logos at me.
 
I hate that it's still going on. No matter how many times I tell YouTube not to recommend such channels, it keeps trying to shove videos with thumbnails of wojaks in PS and Xbox logos at me.
relatable. It's a weird modern console war where they are acting like fanboys shaming other fanboys. XBOTS vs SONY PONIES. lol
 
The console wars were mainly between Nintendo and Sega. On one side, fans of the blue hedgehog, and on the other, fans of the plumber. After that, it got a bit chaotic, since every console had its own strengths and weaknesses.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Support this Site

RGT relies on you to stay afloat. Help covering the site costs and get some pretty Level 7 perks too.

Featured Video

Latest Threads

i miss my wife

sigh my controller is broken, the sticks are drifting so hard, the buttons are barely...
Read more

Future Gaming Masterpiece?

The Legend of Chef: A Link To The Kitchen
rated G, for God Tier. Coming 2098 for Nintendo Fat...
Read more

Navy CIS Series

1200px-NCIS_Logo_2013.png

I have found my passion for Navy CIS, I watched all seasons of Navy CIS New Orleans...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
140
Guests online
3,585
Total visitors
3,725

Forum statistics

Threads
13,084
Messages
318,331
Members
873,557
Latest member
sattas

Advertisers

Back
Top