WWA - Waffles Wants Answers

Waffles

Breakfast Mod
gemgemgemgemgem
Staff member
Writers Guild
Joined
Oct 20, 2024
Messages
1,887
Reaction score
7,035
Points
2,827
Location
Buenos Aires, Argentina 🇦🇷❗
Sometimes I feel like asking random questions that pop into my head, but that aren't really that big of a deal and/or worth starting whole threads over... and, so, I'm making one huge thread instead of a dozen small ones. It's still a bunch of junk, but self-contained junk XD

First question I'm gonna ask is: what do you guys think of "Power-Bombing"?

For those who don't know, "Power-Bombing" was a feature on a couple of mid-aughts sites that allowed premium members to attack regular members by "bombing" their profiles, dealing enough damage to get them suspended and/or banned. There was a caveat, however: a single member couldn't deal enough damage on their own to trigger a suspension, so the targeted victim had to either be strongly disliked or just the result of others teaming up to get rid of them.

The thing about PB is that damage dealt reseted after each month and did not roll over in any way, shape or form... but I still think that it is a terrible idea and I'm honestly surprised that it didn't kill the few sites that adopted it on its own.

What do you think, though? Would you stay a member of a site that allowed such a thing? Do you think it's a neat addition? Or maybe you are completely neutral to it? Tell us!
 
Last edited:
Sometimes I feel like asking random questions that pop into my head, but that aren't really that big of a deal and/or worth starting whole threads over... and, so, I'm making one huge thread instead of a dozen small ones. It's still a bunch of junk, but self-contained junk XD

First question I'm gonna ask is: what do you guys think of "Power-Bombing"?

For those who don't know, "Power-Bombing" was a feature on a couple of mid-aughts sites that allowed premium memembers to attack regular members by "bombing" their profiles, dealing enough damage to get them suspended and/or banned. There was a caveat, however: a single member couldn't deal enough damage on their own to trigger a suspension, so the targeted victim had to either be strongly disliked or just the result of others teaming up to get rid of them.

The thing about PB is that damage dealt reseted after each month and did not roll over in any way, shape or form... but I still think that it is a terrible idea and I'm honestly surprised that it didn't kill the few sites that adopted it on its own.

What do you think, though? Would you stay a member of a site that allowed such a thing? Do you think it's a neat addition? Or maybe you are completely neutral to it? Tell us!
I'm relatively young, never knew this was a thing from the forums of the past, sounds like a horrible business practise that I'm shocked happened more than once.
 
what do you guys think of "Power-Bombing"?
Never heard of it but I'd give it
The Office Thumbs Down GIF
 
I don't remember ever visiting a board with that function. Seems very aggressive. In the 2000s mods were already liable to abuse their power, so I wouldn't have wanted them to have more tools for that lol.
 
No, to me sound's like a Good way to A. Lose members and B. get that one Pissed member who could DDoS you're site into Oblivion
And with this Site, making someone That Mad probably would be the Last thing you want, what with the Big N always looking for Sniper targets.

Alot of people are Thin skinned anyhow, and something like that Could, and Would make them Report things like the Repo ya know
So i Say No, it's a Horrible idea. and Sound's like a Bully tactic to.

no2.gif
 
On Newgrounds, there was a similar feature called BLAMing, where, if a certain game or animation got a low enough user score, it would be deleted and the uploader’s account would be marked. If enough of your content got BLAMed, you were banned.

It sounds harsh, but I seem to recall it being quite effective at cultivating a certain baseline standard of quality. (I’m not sure if they still do it…) I had more than a few of my own works BLAMed, but I do realize now that they were terrible.
 
On Newgrounds, there was a similar feature called BLAMing, where, if a certain game or animation got a low enough user score, it would be deleted and the uploader’s account would be marked. If enough of your content got BLAMed, you were banned.

It sounds harsh, but I seem to recall it being quite effective at cultivating a certain baseline standard of quality. (I’m not sure if they still do it…) I had more than a few of my own works BLAMed, but I do realize now that they were terrible.
I suppose you had no one to BLAMe but yourself? Still sounds kinda harsh haha.
 
Sometimes I feel like asking random questions that pop into my head, but that aren't really that big of a deal and/or worth starting whole threads over... and, so, I'm making one huge thread instead of a dozen small ones. It's still a bunch of junk, but self-contained junk XD

First question I'm gonna ask is: what do you guys think of "Power-Bombing"?

For those who don't know, "Power-Bombing" was a feature on a couple of mid-aughts sites that allowed premium memembers to attack regular members by "bombing" their profiles, dealing enough damage to get them suspended and/or banned. There was a caveat, however: a single member couldn't deal enough damage on their own to trigger a suspension, so the targeted victim had to either be strongly disliked or just the result of others teaming up to get rid of them.

The thing about PB is that damage dealt reseted after each month and did not roll over in any way, shape or form... but I still think that it is a terrible idea and I'm honestly surprised that it didn't kill the few sites that adopted it on its own.

What do you think, though? Would you stay a member of a site that allowed such a thing? Do you think it's a neat addition? Or maybe you are completely neutral to it? Tell us!
I think it's bullshit.
But I've dealt with communities full of toxic assholes that don't want to let regular people do their thing or go around helping site newbies and stuff like that.

Someone without that experience might not understand the degree to which these toxic individuals will gang up on someone; happened to me a month ago, a site I've been on since 2003, but I don't like a person and so their stupid little friends had a mod dig up posts from a year ago just to send me staff warning messages, trying to get enough to get me banned. Apparently they couldn't, since I'm still on there. But I don't frequent that site anymore.
 
Out of curiosity, which sites? I've been on the internet for 30 years and have never heard of this outside of the wrestling move.
 
No, to me sound's like a Good way to A. Lose members and B. get that one Pissed member who could DDoS you're site into Oblivion
And with this Site, making someone That Mad probably would be the Last thing you want, what with the Big N always looking for Sniper targets.

Alot of people are Thin skinned anyhow, and something like that Could, and Would make them Report things like the Repo ya know
So i Say No, it's a Horrible idea. and Sound's like a Bully tactic to.

View attachment 16314
It is, it's a bully tactic and good luck getting 15 of your friends together when they've got 20 already there. Fuck that.

This idea makes me wish I had something like a punching bag or the equivalent. I don't know what to do now, I was already coming down from being mad about some other injustice before this.
 
It is, it's a bully tactic and good luck getting 15 of your friends together when they've got 20 already there. Fuck that.

This idea makes me wish I had something like a punching bag or the equivalent. I don't know what to do now, I was already coming down from being mad about some other injustice before this.
Ah, there is not point getting mad over this, it's only showing something that did go on, not is. and if it still is, not here.

Take a few, calm down, get some air.

headpat.gif
 
Out of curiosity, which sites? I've been on the internet for 30 years and have never heard of this outside of the wrestling move.
One was VampireFreaks.com (and it's rumored to have been the one that started it). Another was a somewhat famous forum I used to visit, also defunct now.
 
Ah, there is not point getting mad over this, it's only showing something that did go on, not is. and if it still is, not here.

Take a few, calm down, get some air.

View attachment 16322
People have ideas like this that are decent in theory, but that's it; when it comes around to practice, you find that not only does the majority not generally agree with each other, but a lot of times it doesn't fuckin' matter whether the majority of the populace wants something; it comes down to when a bunch of people decide to get together and bully someone and I'm fucking sick of it.
 
One was VampireFreaks.com (and it's rumored to have been the one that started it). Another was a somewhat famous forum I used to visit, also defunct now.
Huh. The most I've heard of is mods changing a user's name or handle to something positive or negative, but those were always temporary
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Connect with us

Latest Threads

Can we just talk about the new background?

What's up with the new background? I'm not saying it looks bad but it's umm... well...
Read more

[PCSG00953] Macross Delta Scramble -RunePika Sound Edition- and Vita3K

Would it be possible for someone to inform the people behind Vita3K that they would fix this...
Read more

Digimon Story Cyber Sleuth invisible texts bug on vita 3k

The game is working very fine, but there is one problem: some texts in the game are appearing...
Read more

Anime/manga villains

Who is the one villain you hate the most? Or the most annoying for you?
For me it's Shigaraki...
Read more

What is the power difference between a Gameboy Classic and a Color?

I feel that it was barely that different unless you check late gen (aka 2000-2001) games that...
Read more

Online statistics

Members online
128
Guests online
251
Total visitors
379

Forum statistics

Threads
3,386
Messages
62,286
Members
219,669
Latest member
ссис иса

Support us

Back
Top