Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Kanon_Magic, post: 320905, member: 44316"] true, but in the end, publishers decide what game go out to sale based of what they think the people will like Yes, the problem is that the PC-FX was designed for several things, but it only ended up with FMV (the original design had a 3D graphics chip that later came out on PCs, for NEC PC 98 PCs), since it was cheaper and NEC believed that this was going to be the future. With regard to FMV, I would say that it is a step aside. The problem I see is that it is much more difficult and expensive to make an interactive FMV game than a polygonal one, although they can be more visually appealing. For example, Battle Heat for PC FX is a fighting game that is playable and fast once you understand it, but that is the exception and not the norm. What triumphed were simply the polygons of the PS1. If the PC FX had triumphed, we might have better examples of FMV games and not the limited ones from 1992-1995, since the first polygonal games were also quite limited but improved with time. FMV didn't have that opportunity. [/QUOTE]

Totals may include hidden visitors.