I think the free version is preferable unless you're actually building a dedicated retro gaming machine.
If you're running a normal desktop then lunchbox is much simpler to navigate than bigbox and being free is a bonus. Still, I don't regret throwing the developers a couple of quid to show support with a temporary license.
I use to use Hyperspin for years and loved it. Then after trying Launchbox I switch permanently. Use standard Launchbox on my PC and BigBox side on my arcade machine.
Post automatically merged:
Sorry I didn't know about ES-DE or Lutris before making the poll. Would have added it!
It all depends on each frontend. They all offer their own perk! Launchbox, for example, gives you the standard list UI with box art, video and info ( and gives you Bigbox mode which is more of a full standalone interface which is perfect for arcades that is not really meant to go back and forth to Windows and back. It also gives you database access and connects you to EMU movies so you can get not only access to all the data and images and screenshots you get video clip previews for your games.
Hyperspin is similar and has a great customizable landing screen with animations and images you can customize for each system or game.
I have a launchbox hard drive all games catelogued and easy to use on it especially enjoy the wii U on it as ive got pokken tournament on my laptop now.
RetroArch on PC, I know it's not really a frontend but it's the easiest way to use the Mega Bezel filters I like, and RETROBAT on the mini PC in my living room. I have started messing around with Simple Launcher on my PC though it's pretty cool.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.