Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ikagura, post: 147685, member: 6930"] I disagree, what makes some games recognised as being great and timeless was because you could always enjoy them when redoing it for the 10th time. Mario 64 and Doom are some examples among many. But then again you've just dismissed almost every arcade and 8-bits era video game ever since they're made to be really short with replayability in mind which is probably not what you actually wanted to imply. And once again not everyone would agree with your statement (which is an opinion despite the usage of the term "overrated" to make it seemingly objective). Why are movies seen again, musics listened again and books read again but not video games? The issue is that when a game is marketed to be hundreds of hours long but offers little to no variety in its gameplay it makes it less enticing than a short yet intense experience. Why not both? Memorable [I]and [/I]replayable. I think I could even replay the Zero Escape games just for the puzzles even if I knew the story. [/QUOTE]

Totals may include hidden visitors.