New posts

Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Pearly, post: 289158, member: 115914"] The sole reason I kept my ps3 is that there's some great games on there but emulation is likely never going to be great when it comes to ps3 games. There's even games that won't run correctly without a disc, one specifically that I am aware of, macross 30, it emulates like garbage but, even worse, it runs at 10-15 fps when played as a disc image on the ps3. It plays flawlessly on disc and is one of the few ps3 games that can keep the framerate up despite very heavy visual traffic on screen. It's actually very impressive given that a ps3 game with that much going on on screen can keep the framerate high at all as ps3 games are known for screen tearing and frame drops. The frame rate does drop in macross 30, but very rarely. Whenever I go back to my ps3, I am always taken aback by the screen tearing. Macross 30 actually has a mixed reception due to this on forums and on the net in general, as many players would've emulated or played the ISO on their ps3, and assumed it's poorly optimised thrash. They're half right, given that unless it's on the disc it runs like crap, meaning that the disc is used for specific loading parameters that can't be emulated, either on pc or loaded from the ps3 HDD. It also explains why there's no digital version of the game on psn but there is for the sequel on the Vita. That also emulates like crap apparently, but its fine on a vita, either physical or digital. Both games use the same engine. I am one of the many that kept his ps3 because macross 30 is amazing. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Online statistics

Members online: 141

Guests online: 152

Total visitors: 293

Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads: 11,474

Messages: 280,323

Members: 851,942

Latest member: meebabe

Reply to thread

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Advertisers