Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ikagura, post: 401402, member: 6930"] I used to not like QII because it was too far removed from Quake I in term of ambience, gameplay and level design. KMQuake II was also a way to make the game much more bearable as it's even more clunky in the way you can change weapons and progress through the levels in the game than the first. It was more linear than QI yet wasn't fully seamless like a Half-Life, it was a weird middle spot like Duke was as a more advanced FPS than Doom but still having the "2.5D clunkiness" compared to a Quake. I'm aware that Quake II was meant to be a completely different thing unrelated to Quake but had to take back the name because of the IP being secured already. Thankfully I've redone it on the Switch with the remaster and I appreciated it more. I also think that Quake II is much closer to a "What if Doom actually had a third mainline game in full 3D on PC" than Quake I was in a way. Shame that they've dropped the Strogg storyline after IV (it was a nice game but you can feel it wasn't made by id Software). [/QUOTE]

Totals may include hidden visitors.