Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="regretro, post: 55963, member: 153507"] I think this is the exact intention. Any and all, absolutely. But it is a valid point, and IMHO, far more often you see the opposite, ie "this is not catering to my specific use case so I don't see why it should exist at all". In this case, the intended target audience seems like people with: [LIST] [*]Tiny trouser pockets [*]Taste for retro-inspired games [*]Large disposable income and/or no planned expenses [*]Limited time, so they won't grow bored with the thing within a few days [*]Frequent 5-10 minute breaks they can reach into their tiny pocket and play a quick game of "Crank the Wank" or whatever [/LIST] (I fit the first two, but that's it.) I don't think that is an assumption here. It's new, arguably for the sake of being new, yes. But I don't see the assumption of it being better, or even good. It seems like an interesting experiment. If it turns out cranking your way though mini games is the most exciting things since Dolby Stereo, I'm sure we'll see a crank on the next [I]DualSense[/I] controller. (Or the [I]Xbox Seventwenty XXX Integrated VideoStreamer S+[/I]) [/QUOTE]

Totals may include hidden visitors.