Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="LightningmanEXE, post: 162483, member: 142365"] The original intent, to protect a creator from having their work stolen, has been completely flipped on it's head. now the most mundane things are used as excuses to harass smaller creatives when their work is ever so slightly too close to what a billion dollar company made 80 years ago. I think the original timeframe of 25-30 years of protection is even too lenient with how fast things move... but I'd say it should not only be reverted to that, but make transfer of ownership and impossibility. also it shouldn't protect anything out of print in general [/QUOTE]

Totals may include hidden visitors.