New posts

Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Yousef, post: 324184, member: 963"] NICE!! I was really awaiting your reactions to this. It sure is… worth a look. MEET REFERENCES-MAN! The Ian train of mockery hasn’t stopped on the sonic side of things either, [URL='https://youtu.be/1vPTs5Hhags?si=SM-RekVjNuWhgodr']here’s a recent fan-made rewrite of SA1 in Ian’s style. It’s utterly hilarious. [/URL] Wow that’s a new low. It’s been so long since I’ve read this that I forgot this detail existed. But yeah I recall this fan consensus running around. It’s very silly. Comic book industry is actually partially to blame here. It’s really a coin flip when writers are either completely disposable or treated like Japanese mangaka. In this case, Ian gets the latter treatment. I’ll be 60 by the time I finish reading these bubbles. While we’re on the topic of poorly narrated lore, it really frustrates me when fans call X a reploid. When Y’know, the term is meant to indicate a replicated android, AKA an android created to replicate X’s body and AI. Light was dead when reploids were created so obviously he could not supervise their creation (hell, X wasn’t meant to be revealed for another hundred years). How tf is X a replica of himself? Although, speaking of Light, I remember a funny inconsistency in the games. Sometimes light capsules are recorded messages (and one where he dressed as Ryu, it’s very adorable) but I think in… X5? Was it? He’s an AI and converses with X/Zero. I don’t care for either approach but that always bugged me. [/QUOTE]

Verification

Online statistics

Members online: 130

Guests online: 383

Total visitors: 513

Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads: 14,470

Messages: 346,606

Members: 892,157

Latest member: Cocoamallows

Reply to thread

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Advertisers