New posts

Reply to thread

Message: [QUOTE="Ikagura, post: 249894, member: 6930"] Either OP is trying to troll people or this dude has clearly not played Mario nor Sonic games at all to say that. [SPOILER]Of course if you run without being careful you'd end up hitting traps or enemies, the goal there is not about being fast but about momentum. Even during the slower precise platforming sections Sonic has quite a slow startup to make it possible. This is also why Sonic 1 and Sonic CD are often seen as the slowest of the games in the series because of the lack of a proper spindash and a level design allowing for more speed. Sonic 2 was quite a great leap simply because of that additional ability and how you can basically manage to avoid getting hit by any ground enemies and usually the more complex ones are either static or predictable most of the time. Another good thing is how it's rather the lower paths that are filled with spikes while the upper one that requires a bit more skill is devoid of them, that's what incites the player to get better and avoid falling into the lower routes of any given level.[/SPOILER] Mario is accessible and family friendly but saying that it's a "bing bing wahoo game for babies" clearly shows you haven't played the secret worlds nor the first three/four games. Even Mario 64 is a rather deeply complex game in its moveset complementing that level design. A lot of gamers are in the spectrum, especially for those series, it's not new. On the other hand was it really insulting to make an observation? [/QUOTE]

Verification

Online statistics

Members online: 165

Guests online: 260

Total visitors: 425

Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads: 10,270

Messages: 254,707

Members: 818,260

Latest member: siathus

Reply to thread

Online statistics

Forum statistics

Advertisers